Sixth Job as Faculty in Dr MCR HRD Institute-2
Systematic Approach to Training (SAT)
Essential Principle
Professions, Checkered Career,
and Lessons-11
Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao (July
2, 2026)
During the period, working in Dr
MCR HRD Institute, I was closely associated with the training of nine
consecutive batches of IAS probationers allotted to the (Erstwhile AP) State,
coordinating their district training and institute attachments. Many of these
officers now occupy senior leadership positions, and the enduring professional
bonds formed during those years remain a source of quiet satisfaction. I was
similarly involved in foundation and thematic programs for Group I and II
officers, heads of departments, and even the entire State Cabinet, which
underwent a three-day orientation program after the 1999 elections, an
initiative of the then CM Chandrababu Naidu, that was unprecedented at the
time.
Equally enriching was the
opportunity to work with a constellation of distinguished administrators and
training professionals, where hierarchy rarely overshadowed collegiality. The
collective energy, intellectual openness and shared commitment to public purpose
created an environment where learning was continuous and contribution was
valued over position.
Looking back, my years at Dr MCR
HRD Institute were far more than a job or an assignment. They were a period of
sustained learning, purposeful contribution, and institutional belonging. I
witnessed how vision, when matched with leadership, systems and trust, can
transform an organization and the people within it. The Institute’s journey
from an obscure administrative training center to a globally recognized apex
institution mirrored, in many ways, my own professional evolution.
These memories are recalled not
merely as a record of the past, but as a source of reassurance and
encouragement, for myself, and for those close to me, in times of uncertainty
as well as achievement. They reaffirm my enduring belief that institutions grow
when people are trusted, learning is nurtured, and purpose remains larger than
personal ambition. The lessons gathered during this phase continue to guide me,
quietly and consistently, in every walk of life.
This narrative is a
comprehensive, chronological, and institution-centric account of the Dr Marri
Channa Reddy Human Resource Development Institute, consciously rewritten to
strengthen structure, depth, sequencing, and clarity. It places the Institute
at the center, highlights the decisive roles of PVRK Prasad, N Chandrababu
Naidu, Urmila Subba Rao and M P Sethy, and situates my association only where
contextually necessary, avoiding self-repetition. The intent is to present a
full, flowing history of institutional transformation, free of redundancy, rich
in programs and outcomes, and entirely positive in spirit.
The origins of the Dr MCR HRD
Institute lie in the early national recognition that administration,
governance, and development depend fundamentally on the quality of human
resources. Acting on recommendations made at the national level to strengthen
training for civil and technical services, the Government of India advised
States to establish dedicated administrative training institutions.
Accordingly, the Institute of Administration was established in March 1976 in
the then undivided Andhra Pradesh.
In its formative decades, the
Institute functioned primarily as a conventional administrative training
center, organizing rule-based, classroom-oriented programs with limited
infrastructure, modest budgets and no systematic linkage between training inputs
and governance outcomes. By the mid-1990s, the need for a fundamental shift,
from routine administrative training to structured capacity and capability
building, was becoming increasingly evident.
It was during this period that
the Institute entered a phase of gradual but decisive transition. When I joined
the Institute on September 5, 1995 as Faculty, under the leadership of Dr V
Chandra Mouli, it was still widely known as the Institute of Administration.
Training programs were repetitive, participation was limited to familiar groups
of officers, and the Jubilee Hills campus was relatively unknown even within
government circles. Yet, this phase also marked the beginning of introspection
and preparation for change.
A critical catalyst in this
transition was the role played by Urmila Subba Rao, who, as Additional Director
General and later In-charge Director General, initiated the earliest steps
towards professionalizing training. She recognized that training could no
longer remain episodic or ceremonial and began aligning the Institute with the
emerging framework of the National Training Policy. During this phase, the
conceptual groundwork for systematic training, training needs analysis and
institutional expansion was laid.
Her engagement with the Chief
Minister N Chandrababu Naidu, and always her meetings with the CM accompanied
by me, reflected his growing interest in positioning training and capacity
building as central to governance reform. The transformation acquired decisive
momentum with the assumption of charge by PVRK Prasad as Director General in
the late 1990s. PVRK brought to the Institute a rare combination of
administrative experience, moral authority, and strategic vision. His career
had already demonstrated his ability to leave behind strong, self-sustaining
institutions, and Dr MCR HRD Institute became one of his most enduring
legacies.
At the time PVRK took charge, the
Institute was still functioning largely as a traditional training
establishment. Within a short span, he re-imagined its role as the Apex Human
Resource Development Institution of the State. One of his earliest and most consequential
contributions was redefining the Institute’s mandate itself. The Institute was
renamed as Dr Marri Channa Reddy Human Resource Development Institute,
symbolizing a shift from administrative instruction to holistic human resource
development, aligned with the present and future needs of the State Government.
This institutional redefinition
coincided with the reform-oriented governance philosophy of Chief Minister N
Chandrababu Naidu. A strong believer in systematic training, technology-driven
governance and accountability, the Chief Minister took personal interest in the
Institute’s evolution. As Chairman of the Board of Governors, he consistently
emphasized that training must be purposeful, measurable, and linked to
outcomes. His concept of SMART Governance, Simple, Moral, Accountable,
Responsive and Transparent, found practical expression through the training
architecture developed at the Institute.
One of the most path-breaking
initiatives of this phase was the Systematic Training Needs Analysis of State
Government employees using Optical Mark Reader technology. Conceived to
operationalize the National Training Policy’s vision of ‘Training for All’ this
exercise covered several lakh employees across cadres, from Junior Assistants
to Heads of Departments. It was among the first such large-scale, data-driven
training needs assessments undertaken in the country and marked a decisive
departure from intuition-based program design.
The findings of this exercise
became the foundation for the State Training Initiative (STI), an ambitious and
structured program aimed at ensuring a minimum quantum of training,
approximately sixty hours, for every State Government employee. The STI represented
a fundamental shift from sporadic capacity building to sustained capability
building. Training was no longer viewed as an event, but as a continuous
process embedded within administrative life.
Institutional infrastructure
expanded rapidly to support this transformation. The Institute’s
thirty-three-acre campus at Jubilee Hills was developed into a modern,
state-of-the-art learning environment. New floors were added, training halls
and auditoriums were modernized, conference and mini-conference halls were
created, and residential facilities, sports infrastructure and support services
were strengthened. What emerged was not merely a training campus, but a
comprehensive ecosystem for learning, reflection, and professional interaction.
A landmark achievement during
this period was the establishment of the Centre for Good Governance within the
Institute campus. Conceived as a hub for identifying best practices, promoting
administrative reforms, and developing replicable governance models, the Centre
soon gained national and international recognition. Its inauguration by the
then UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, and his extended engagement with the Chief
Minister on the campus, symbolized the global relevance the Institute had
attained.
Parallel to infrastructural
expansion was a deliberate effort to professionalize training design and
delivery. The Institute pioneered the use of video, and DVD-based learning,
satellite-supported programs, and computer-based training modules. Large-scale
trainer development initiatives were undertaken, and the Institute achieved ISO
certification within a record period, reinforcing its commitment to quality
systems and processes. Collaborations with national and international
institutions, including the Department of Personnel and Training, UNDP, and
leading academic bodies, further strengthened its professional credibility.
A crucial contributor to this
professional depth was MP Sethy, one of the country’s foremost Master Trainers
and a key figure in shaping India’s Trainer-Training Ecosystem. Brought to the
Institute through determined institutional effort, Sethy’s presence elevated
the quality of Trainer Development, Module Design and Pedagogical Rigor. His
association significantly strengthened the Institute’s capacity to design and
deliver high-impact programs and contributed to its reputation as a national
leader in training innovation.
Another distinctive feature of
this phase was the emphasis on leadership ownership of training. To
institutionalize this principle, the Orientation to Management of Training
program (OMOT) was conceptualized and implemented for senior IAS, IPS and
non-cadre officers, including Heads of Departments. This program underscored
that training effectiveness depends as much on leadership commitment as on
content or methodology. The model was later adopted by training institutions
across the country.
The Institute also played a
central role in developing change leadership within the State through programs
such as Governing for Results, Core Group Development initiatives and
sector-specific interventions in areas including land reforms, tribal welfare,
forest development, human rights, disaster management, child labor elimination,
and citizen-centric administration. Innovative strategies, such as influencing
key stakeholders and opinion leaders, were employed to ensure wider societal
impact.
Training of successive batches of
IAS probationers allotted to the State, foundation programs for Group I and II
officers, and thematic programs for a wide range of services further
consolidated the Institute’s role as the State’s apex training institution. A
defining moment in this journey was the conduct of the first-ever structured
training program for the entire State Cabinet after the 1999 elections,
reflecting the Chief Minister’s conviction that learning and governance must
progress together.
Over time, the Institute evolved
from a little-known administrative training center into an internationally
respected center of excellence in human resource development. This
transformation was not the result of isolated initiatives, but of sustained vision,
leadership continuity, professional commitment, and institutional trust. The
imprint of PVRK. Prasad’s institution-building leadership, the reform-driven
governance philosophy of CM N Chandrababu Naidu, the foundational contributions
of Urmila Subba Rao, and the professional rigor introduced by MP Sethy remain
deeply embedded in the Institute’s DNA. I was part of every phase of this
transformation and did my best.
This account is offered as a
comprehensive institutional memoir that fits naturally within my sixth
professional engagement, while keeping the focus firmly on the Institute, its
leadership, and its programs. It stands as a reminder that when training is treated
as a strategic priority, institutions can be transformed, governance
strengthened and public service elevated. The legacy of Dr MCR HRD Institute
during this period continues to affirm the enduring value of vision, patience,
professionalism, and faith in institutional growth.
This long and fulfilling phase at
the Institute not only enriched my professional capabilities but also
reinforced my belief that institutions grow when people are trusted, learning
is continuous, and purpose remains larger than position. These lessons, quietly
accumulated over nine years, continue to guide me in every sphere of life. What
this period gradually revealed to me was that meaningful work seldom announces
itself loudly, and that the most enduring contributions are often the result of
patience, shared effort, and an unwavering commitment to processes rather than
personalities.
I came to appreciate that real
satisfaction in professional life flows not from titles or tenures, but from
being part of something that steadily outlives individual roles and momentary
recognition. The confidence gained from having witnessed and participated in
such institution-building is deep, unspoken, and self-sustaining, requiring
neither validation nor explanation. What followed thereafter was yet another
phase of varied engagements and transitions, which I touch upon later, with as
much detail as memory permits, carrying forward these convictions not as
learned theories, but as quietly internalized companions that continue to shape
choices, responses, and perspective.
{{From my Forthcoming Book
PROFESSIONS, CHECKERED CAREER,
AND LESSONS
(From Librarian to CPRO to CM
KCR)
A Journey from Khangi School to Center for Excellence}}


No comments:
Post a Comment