Paradigms:
Marxism, Buddhism,
and Epic Literature,
Ideological
Realignment and
Civilizational Continuity
31st FETE-Friday Evening Team
Meet (November 6, 2026)
Vanam
Jwala Narasimha Rao
The
thirty-first consecutive Friday Evening Gathering of like-minded journalist
friends and professionals at the Press Club Hyderabad, held on November 6,
2026, seamlessly sustained the rich, evolving tradition of transforming
informal weekend conversations into a living repository of shared intellect and
institutional memory. Operating within the established framework of voluntary
fellowship, complete egalitarianism, and the treasured culture of respectful
disagreement, the evening's multilogue traversed a remarkable spectrum of ideas
around ‘Friday Square Table.’
Without
the constraint of a rigid agenda or formal presidency, the table allowed its
collective curiosity to move effortlessly between contemporary state actions,
ideological policing, deep civilizational philosophy, epic literature, and the
institutionalization of cultural heritage. And in the process on the continuous
case on Varavara Rao, Buddhism referring to Sri Lanka, Yoga Vasistham, Narla V Rao’s
book, birth of new organization to spread Buddhist philosophy etc.
In
addition to regular participants Amar, GK, Subbarao, Bharat, myself, Mallepally,
two first time participants, both members of the Press Club joined the FETE
this time. One is, N Venugopal (Nellutla Venugopal Rao), a Telugu poet,
literary critic, translator and journalist, who is currently editor of
Veekshanam, Telugu monthly journal of political economy and society. The other member
is VSR Naidu Former CGM (Corporate Communications) AP Transco, and Former COO
AP Solar Power Corporation.
The
initial segment of the dialogue focused sharply on the systemic realities of ‘Political
Governance or Governance by Politics’ and the state's treatment of Prominent
Marxist intellectuals and activists, particularly those associated with radical
left ideologies.
The
FETE in accordance with its normal practice in its earlier 30 meetings, attempted
an honest analysis of the growing tendency of state apparatuses to deploy
trans-state legal mechanisms to implicate dissenting voices, citing the
prominent, highly controversial case of the veteran ideologue and poet Varavara
Rao. Participants examined the complex jurisdictional and structural dimensions
of an instance where an individual was entangled in an intensive legal case
originating not within his native state of Telangana, but in distant
Maharashtra. Venugopal unbiasedly detailed salient features of the background
and context.
The
table as usual, avoided partisan accusations, choosing instead to critique how
modern democratic executives occasionally utilize administrative tools to
execute long-term containment strategies against ideological outliers, raising
profound questions regarding civil liberties, the limits of police power, and
the resilience of constitutional safeguards when state security interests
intersect with radical political philosophy.
Based
on Venu explaining the FETE table analyzed the whole aspect as, Varavara Rao’s
legal entanglement remains a highly controversial chapter in modern Indian
statecraft, bridging local activism with trans-state policing. The
septuagenarian poet and Marxist Ideologue from Telangana was arrested by
Maharashtra police in 2018 in connection with the Elgar Parishad-Bhima Koregaon
case. The state alleged his involvement in a radical conspiracy linked to
banned Maoist networks.
Critics,
however, consistently argued that the multi-state investigation was a
calculated, disproportionate attempt to suppress dissenting intellectual
voices. The prolonged judicial process sparked intense national debates
regarding civil liberties, political profiling, and the treatment of elderly
political prisoners. Though it is not a secret, Venu mentioned that Rao spent
over two years in custody, during which his deteriorating health and regular
hospitalizations drew widespread humanitarian concern from international Human Rights
bodies.
After
a rigorous legal battle highlighting the structural delays in tribal-belt
containment cases, the Supreme Court of India granted him permanent medical
bail in 2022. The case remains a stark illustration of institutional friction
between state security and constitutional freedom. FETE further viewed that, from
an analytical perspective, Varavara Rao's case highlights the deep structural
tension between state sovereignty and individual constitutional liberties.
By
using the anti-terror law to cross state borders and execute long-term pretrial
detention, the state apparatus effectively demonstrated how administrative
procedures can be leveraged as instruments of political containment. While
national security requires the proactive monitoring of radical underground
networks, the lack of a timely trial and the heavy reliance on digitized
evidence of disputed origin exposed significant institutional vulnerabilities,
felt the FETE.
Ultimately,
this intervention blurred the critical line between containing violent
extremism and suppressing ideological dissent, establishing a chilling
precedent for how the modern state can neutralize inconvenient intellectual
opposition within the framework of democratic consensus. The table
contextualized these state interventions as part of an enduring global
phenomenon, noting that mature and developing democracies alike frequently
deploy cross-border legal apparatuses and anti-terror legislation to neutralize
radical intellectual dissent.
Parallel historical and contemporary templates
resonate closely with the systemic dynamics of Varavara Rao’s case,
demonstrating how states leverage legal frameworks for political containment. Reflecting
upon these international templates, the FETE members reached a measured
consensus that India is no exception to this global rule of statecraft. The FETE
table observed that in the matrix of governance, constitutional democracy and
state security cases operate as two distinct, parallel tracks.
At this juncture one of the participants made
a reference to the phrase: ‘Kill the Indian, Save the Man’ episode, where the
US Federal Government used its sovereign authority to forcibly remove
indigenous children from their families and place them in distant, state-funded
boarding schools. However, in this specific historical context, the word ‘Indian’
refers exclusively to ‘Native Americans’ (the Indigenous Peoples of North
America), not people from the ‘Country of India.’
Throughout American History, the US Government,
military, and public legally referred to them in the same way. The phrase was
the guiding philosophy behind the late 19th and early 20th
Century assimilation policies implemented by the US government. Coined by
Captain Richard Henry Pratt, this doctrine served as the official rationale for
the Native American boarding school system, most famously exemplified by the
Carlisle Indian Industrial School.
When Captain said this, he meant: Completely
destroy the ‘Native American Culture, Language, Religion, and Identity’ inside
the child. Save the Man means, Save the individual person by turning them into
a Westernized, English-speaking, Christian Citizen who would blend into white
American society. Thus, it was a policy of ‘Cultural Erasure’ and if analyzed
through an objective academic lens, it represented a deliberate exercise of ‘State
Sovereignty’ to achieve total cultural homogeneity through forced institutional
assimilation.
While
the democratic framework loudly proclaims ‘Universal Civil Liberties,’ the
administrative state simultaneously utilizes specialized legal machinery to
execute the containment of ideological outliers, proving that the preservation
of systemic stability frequently overrides the lofty ideals of individual
franchise across the globe. This critique of materialist ideology and state
coercion provided a natural philosophical bridge to the evening’s extensive
exploration of Buddhism.
Thus,
it was examined not through the lens of institutional religion, but as a
revolutionary intellectual movement that fundamentally disrupted the
established socio-religious paradigm of ancient India. The conversation focused
on the profound existential transition of Siddhartha Gautama, who chose to
deliberately abandon royal luxury, inherited status, and dynastic security to
step into the isolation of the forest in a relentless pursuit of foundational
knowledge.
The
table analyzed his (Buddha) radical methodology, initiated by Mallepally
Lakshmaiah, who himself is known for his fundamental views on various aspects, in
addition to shouldering the responsibility as co-convenor of Political Joint Action
Committee during the second phase of separate statehood agitation, eventually
achieving the state, and demonstrated his capabilities through his
transformative work at the internationally recognized Buddha Vanam project.
The
Analysis was anchored in empirical observation and logical deduction rather
than reliance on divine revelation or scriptural authority. FETE Participants
noted that Buddhism emerged as a powerful, systematic critique of the
contemporary Vedic Order, explicitly disproving and rejecting the absolute
authority of the Vedas, the cosmic necessity of elaborate Yagnas, animal
sacrifices, and the hereditary stratification of social hierarchies.
The
discussion centered on the structural elegance of the Buddha's core
philosophical framework: the Four Noble Truths. The table retrieved broadly these
foundational principles, examining the systematic reality of ‘Dukkha’ (Suffering),
‘Samudaya’ (Its origin in Attachment), ‘Nirodha’ (The Possibility of its
absolute cessation), and ‘Magga’ (the structured Eightfold Path to liberation).
The
group deliberated on how this diagnostic approach operated as a highly
rational, almost scientific framework for human psychology. By placing the
agency of salvation entirely within individual consciousness, the Buddha
revolutionized ancient thought, substituting rigid external priestly rituals
with disciplined personal action.
The
group deliberated on how this diagnostic approach: identifying the reality of
suffering, locating its origin in attachment, affirming the possibility of its
cessation, and mapping the structured path to liberation, operated as a highly
rational, almost scientific framework for human psychology and ethics,
transforming the ancient world by placing the agency of salvation entirely
within the reach of individual consciousness and disciplined action rather than
external priestly intervention.
The
theme of acquiring knowledge and navigating internal crisis naturally led the
table to examine the profound narratives embedded within the ‘Yoga Vasistham,’
focusing on the transformative spiritual journey of a young Prince Rama. The
dialogue reconstructed the poignant moment when Rama, returned from a
nationwide pilgrimage and overwhelmed by a deep existential dejection regarding
the fleeting nature of worldly existence, received the news of his impending
royal coronation.
Rather
than embracing the material grandeur of the throne, the young prince mounted
his horse and rode directly to the humble forest hermitage of the family's Chief
Priest and preceptor, Sage Vasistha, seeking structural clarity on the nature
of reality, duty, and human consciousness. This narrative prompted an absorbing
comparative analysis between the trajectories of Buddha and Rama. The
roundtable highlighted the stark structural difference in their paths to
enlightenment.
Siddhartha
Gautama was forced to completely sever his institutional ties, abandon his
kingdom, and wander as an isolated seeker to discover truth entirely on his own
terms, whereas, Prince Rama obtained his profound philosophical realization
within the matrix of his royal duties, receiving the comprehensive teachings of
the Yoga Vasistham directly from his Chief Priest while remaining firmly
embedded within the framework of statecraft, family responsibilities, and
dynastic expectations.
The
participants then traced the historical and philosophical evolution that
followed these ancient intellectual movements, viewing the later emergence of
the schools of Indian Philosophy: Advaita, Visistadvaita, and Dvaita, as a
direct, sophisticated historical sequel to the sweeping spread of Buddhism
across the subcontinent. The table reasoned that the radical Buddhist Critique
had so thoroughly shaken the foundations of traditional thought that the
ancient orthodox systems were propelled to structurally reinvent their own
metaphysical frameworks.
The
subsequent philosophical renaissance, pioneered by masters like Adi
Shankaracharya, Ramanujacharya, and Madhvacharya, was analyzed not as an
isolated theological development, but as a rigorous, dialectical response
designed to assimilate the logical rigor, monastic organization, and
psychological insights of Buddhism while simultaneously re-anchoring society
within a redefined Vedic framework.
Yet,
against the backdrop of Buddhism serving as the Primary ‘Purvapakṣa’ (opposing
viewpoint), that forced orthodox schools to refine their logic, the FETE
discussion remained objective: appreciating how each distinct school, whether
proposing absolute non-dualism, qualified non-dualism, or stark dualism,
contributed to a magnificent tapestry of intellectual pluralism. This
demonstrated that civilizational continuity in India has always been sustained
through intense, sophisticated debate and the constant capacity to absorb,
counter, and refine challenging ideological paradigms across successive eras.
Turning
their attention back to epic literature, the ‘Friday Square Table’ revisited
the Valmiki Ramayana, focusing on the highly complex, intellectually
provocative character of ‘Jabali’ as depicted during the intense deliberations
in the Ayodhya Kanda. The conversation analyzed Jabali’s sharp, uncompromising
counsel to Rama at Chitrakoot, where he actively urged the prince to reject his
father's deceased mandate, dismiss abstract notions of after-life
righteousness, and return to claim the material comforts of the kingdom.
The
table engaged in a layered discussion regarding whether Jabali should be
categorized purely as an absolute atheist, a proto-Charvaka materialist, or
rather as a strategic, highly skilled sophist who deliberately deployed extreme
rationalist arguments solely to test the depth, resilience, and unshakeable
ethical commitment of Rama's character. This exploration of moral ambiguity in
the forest exile extended to a subtle analysis of an often-overlooked dialogue
between Sita and Rama regarding the carrying of weapons.
The
group examined Mallepally Lakshmaiah’s nuanced analysis of Sita's
profound, gentle objection to Rama and Lakshmana constantly carrying lethal
arms while living the peaceful life of forest ascetics. With remarkable
psychological and tactical foresight, Sita had cautioned that the mere
possession of weapons naturally alters human intent, warning that carrying bows
and arrows in a tranquil environment would inevitably provoke an unwanted
violent confrontation with the Rakshasas, effectively acting as an indirect
catalyst for a full-scale war.
In
this context, the book authored by the yester years legendary journalist and
rationalist thinker Narla Venkateswara Rao, the celebrated Telugu play ‘Seetha
Josyam’ (The Prophecy of Seetha), came for reference and discussion. In the context of the dialogue at Chitrakoot,
the play offers a fiercely rationalist re-examination of the epic timeline,
highlighting Sita’s critical voice against the normalization of structural
violence.
Narla
leverages Sita's profound moral objections to the carrying of weapons in the
forest as an early civilizational critique of pre-emptive militarization,
explicitly framing her not as a passive companion, but as an articulate,
independent advocate for ethical restraint and philosophical containment. The square
table celebrated this narrative nuance as a timeless meditation on the
relationship between militarization, disarmament, and human psychology,
illustrating that the epic constantly balances the demands of ‘Kshatra Dharma’
with a profound awareness of ecological peace and moral restraint.
The
final segment of the evening transitioned seamlessly from ancient literary
geography to modern global institution-building and cultural diplomacy. The
table enthusiastically deliberated on the conceptualization and imminent
formation of a new international organization, anchored across the Palk Strait
with Sri Lanka as its operational base, dedicated exclusively to the global
dissemination, research, and preservation of Buddhist philosophy, heritage
sites, and traditional knowledge networks.
Crucially,
the participants noted with immense collective pride that this high-profile
global initiative is scheduled to function under the international chairmanship
of one of FETE’s own core members. He is none other than the distinguished
senior journalist and social intellectual Mallepally Laxmaiah. The name of the
organization revealed Lakshmaiah as: ‘World Buddhist Scholars Alliance.’
Mallepally
Laxmaiah has been actively leading this cross-nation synchronization effort.
Alongside international partners like Bollywood actor and Buddhist activist
Gagan Malik, he participates as a core pillar of the Alliance to promote global
peace, cultural diplomacy, and structural preservation frameworks between India
and Sri Lanka. Lakshmaiah told the group that the alliance was formally
inaugurated in ‘Matara, Sri Lanka,’ establishing a new anchor across the Palk
Strait for cross-border heritage collaboration.
As
narrated by Mallepally Laxmaiah at the FETE meeting, the establishment of the
World Buddhist Scholars Alliance (WOBSA) is a commendable and timely initiative
that brings together scholars, Buddhist institutions and cultural custodians
across nations. Its vision of preserving and promoting the rich tangible and
intangible heritage of Buddhism, while fostering peace, equality, compassion
and fraternity, gives this organisation a truly global significance.
It
is structured specifically as a platform for global scholars and lay
practitioners to advance research into Buddhist philosophy, protect historic
heritage sites, digitize ancient manuscripts, and disseminate traditional South
Asian knowledge networks. The group reasoned that Laxmaiah’s proven
institutional expertise, demonstrated through his transformative work at the
internationally recognized Buddha Vanam project, and Center for Dalit Studies, positions
him perfectly to steer this cross-border cultural bridge, connecting the shared
civilizational memory of India, Sri Lanka, and the wider Asian landscape.
WOBSA
deserves appreciation for going beyond the boundaries of academic scholarship
and creating a common platform for research, knowledge-sharing, cultural
exchange and the preservation of Buddhist traditions. Its commitment to
bringing together diverse intellectual and spiritual resources for the benefit
of humanity is particularly noteworthy. This new initiative holds immense
promise in strengthening Buddhist unity and ensuring that the timeless wisdom
of the Dhamma continues to inspire future generations.
As
the unhurried evening drew toward its eventual conclusion over ‘Social Drink, Shared
Refreshments and Warm Spiritual Camaraderie,’ the participants recognized that
the thirty-first meeting had successfully reinforced the defining strength of
their fellowship: providing an unhurried, free-thinking sanctuary where the
profound insights of ancient history, philosophy, and epic literature
consistently arrive to illuminate, balance, and humanize the immediate, complex
civic and political realities of the contemporary world.