Monday, November 2, 2026

Dasharatha, Karma, and Price of an Unseen Sin >>>>Simplified and faithful rendering of the Adi Kavya-46: Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao

 Simplified and faithful rendering 

of the Adi Kavya-46

The Returning Arrow

Dasharatha, Karma, and Price of an Unseen Sin

Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao 

(November 03, 2026)

 The previous chapter closed upon a moment of grave realization. In the turmoil that followed Rama’s exile, that was brought about by Dasharatha’s hasty and unreflective granting of Kaikeyi’s boons, the king found himself confronted not merely with grief, but with a deeper moral reckoning. As sorrow pressed upon his heart, a long-forgotten memory stirred within him. Dasharatha gradually understood that what he was enduring was not the cruelty of fate, but the return of his own past action. Destiny was not punishing him. It was simply bringing back what had once been set in motion.

What unfolds in this chapter is the slow unveiling of that forgotten episode, a tragic mistake committed in youth, the grief of innocent parents, and the curse that followed. The unbearable anguish now consuming Dasharatha begins to reveal its hidden origin, demonstrating how Karma ripens across time, often returning when one least expects it. The Valmiki Ramayana repeatedly reminds that actions, whether noble or careless, rarely vanish into the past. They wait silently for the moment when their consequences must be faced.

As Kausalya spoke to Dasharatha, she said that the more she thought of her son, the more her heart burned within her like fire. She insisted that she had no desire whatsoever to hurt her husband and begged him to forgive her if any of her words caused him pain. Her grief, she said, was growing day by day, and she feared what fate might yet await her. As she spoke these words to Dasharatha, the sun slowly set and darkness spread across the sky. The king listened to Kausalya’s words of concern and reflection, and, overwhelmed by anguish, closed his eyes in distress. This was one among the many scenes unfolding in Ayodhya after Rama had departed for the forest.

After resting for a short while, the king awoke. His mind returned to the memory of the sin he once committed. Thinking of his son and daughter-in-law, his heart grew heavy. Then, at midnight on the sixth day after Rama’s departure, Dasharatha said to Kausalya that he was weeping because he was separated from Sri Rama. The sorrow he was experiencing, he explained, was the result of a deed he himself once committed. Because of that past action, he was forced to part from Sri Ramachandra, and yet, in foolish ignorance, he was lamenting the very consequence of his own karma.

Grief often loosens the doors of memory. In moments when pride collapses and the heart stands exposed, the past returns with a clarity that ordinary days rarely permit. Dasharatha then confessed that in his youth he was skilled in archery and earned the reputation of a ‘Shabda-Vedi’ the one who could strike a target merely by hearing its sound. In those days, while practicing this remarkable skill, he committed a grave sin. The fruit of that act ripened and returned to him, when the time came.

Dasharatha told Kausalya that the sin was caused by an arrow released in the practice of that very art. He then narrated the entire story. At that time, he reminded her, she was not married to him. He was still the young crown prince. Dasharatha continued his account. One year, during the rainy season, the heat had subsided and the sky was filled with clouds heavy with water, shimmering in flashes of lightning. Frogs croaked loudly in the marshes, and the calls of peacocks echoed across the landscape. In that pleasant season, filled with the sounds of nature, Dasharatha mounted his chariot, armed with bow and arrow, and set out with the desire to hunt.

 

Abilities admired by the world can become instruments of tragedy when used without restraint. Skill without mindfulness may transform talent into calamity. He went to the banks of the River Sarayu and waited alone near a watering spot where wild animals often came to drink. Concealing himself there during the night, he intended to strike the fierce creatures that approached the river. After some time, he heard a sound that resembled the deep gurgling noise made by an elephant while drinking water. Because of the dense darkness, relying solely upon the sound, he assumed that an elephant stood there, and guided only by that noise, he released an arrow toward the source of the sound.

The arrow did not strike an elephant. It pierced a young ascetic. A human voice cried out in agony: ‘Ah! Ah!’ In the stillness of that forest night, a single arrow transformed a moment of pride into a lifetime of remorse. The Ramayana here reminds how one single careless act, committed in ignorance, can alter the destinies of many lives. The ascetic youth fell to the ground, cried out in anguish, and wondered aloud how an arrow could have struck him while he was engaged in a life of penance.

He also wondered at a place where humans seldom venture, how could someone kill him without cause. What harm had he ever done to deserve such a fate? Clad in bark garments, with matted locks upon his head, living the life of a sage in the solitude of the forest, he had been struck down by a cruel arrow. What gain, he asked himself, could the killer possibly obtain by slaying him? Surely the world would condemn such an act.

When he said to himself that he did not grieve for his own death, and instead the thought of his aged parents, whom he had long protected and cared for. Remembering them caused his heart to tremble. The moment they hear of his death, they too would perish helplessly. Some foolish person, ignorant of right and wrong, had with a single arrow destroyed three lives. As Dasharatha recounted these words, he said that the moment he realized that the victim was a young ascetic, the bow and arrows slipped from his hands and fell to the ground of their own accord.

In that instant the pride of the hunter vanished, replaced by the unbearable awareness that an irreversible act was committed. Often, the weight of a mistake is felt most deeply not at the moment of action, but at the moment of recognition. Hearing those heart-rending words, Dasharatha told Kausalya that, his heart trembled violently. He rushed toward the banks of the River Sarayu and there saw the young ascetic boy wriggling in agony from the wound of the arrow. As soon as the boy saw him, he spoke harshly.

The boy said: ‘What harm did I do to you? My parents were thirsty and asked me to fetch water. I came here for that purpose and dying at your hands. With a single arrow you have killed not one but three lives. How will my parents, who wait for me, bear this terrible news? They have no sight. Unable to search for me, they will lie there crying for me. In this desolate forest who will tell them what has happened to me? And even if someone tells them, how will they, unable to walk, find their way to me?’

The boy continued, addressing the Prince by name. ‘Dasharatha! Go quickly to where my father lives. If you do not go, he will curse you in anger and reduce you to ashes. I will show you the path to our hermitage. If you go and beg his forgiveness, he may not be angry with you. Please pull out this arrow, to enable me to die. Do not fear that the sin of killing a Brahmin will fall upon you. I am not a Brahmin. I was born to a Vaishya father and a Shudra mother.’ Having said these words, the ascetic youth fainted. Even while standing at the threshold of death, the boy’s concern remained fixed not upon himself, but upon his helpless parents: a reminder that true virtue reveals itself most clearly in moments of suffering.

Dasharatha told Kausalya that he then removed the arrow, went to the hermitage, saw two aged people who lost their sight and were unable to walk. As he approached the parents of the young ascetic, Dasharatha said that his heart began to pound heavily. Hearing the sound of someone approaching, the blind couple assumed that their son returned. They asked why he had taken so long. They thought that the son forgot their suffering and was playing on the way instead of fetching water. They said that their tongues were parched with thirst, and asked to give some water.

Still being under the impression that it was not Dasharatha who came, but it was their son, they continued saying: ‘Dear child! You are our treasure of austerity. Through your devoted service to us, your parents, you have become truly blessed. Our lives depend entirely upon you. Why do you not speak? For us who cannot see, you are our eyes. For us who have no protector, you are our protector. Is it right for you to neglect us?’ While they spoke in faint, trembling voices, Dasharatha approached the sage and slowly began to speak. There are moments in life when confession becomes inevitable, when silence itself feels heavier than the truth. Dasharatha now stood before that moment, knowing that words alone could not undo what had already been done.

Dasharatha then told Kausalya that he approached the sage, and in all humility informed him that he is not his son, is a Kshatriya, and his name is Dasharatha. He then revealed what all that happened at the banks of the River Sarayu, and about the death of his son by his arrow. Dasharatha also told the sage that, before dying his son giving all the details of his parents. ‘Following the path your son showed, I have come to see you. I am a sinner. Do with me as you wish. Whether you punish me or forgive me, I shall accept whatever you decide, for the fault is mine.’ Said Dasharatha to the sage which was revealed to Kausalya

Dasharatha told Kausalya that when the old couple heard these words, spoken by him in fear and repentance, they cried out repeatedly for his son and remembering him. Addressing him, the sage said, ‘A Kshatriya cannot live in peace after killing one who has embraced the life of austerity in the forest. Yet you have survived because you confessed your sin with remorse. Since the mistake was committed in ignorance, I forgive you. Now take us to the place where our son lies dead. It is our wish to see him lying there upon the ground, drenched in blood.’

Dasharatha told Kausalya that he guided them both to the spot. Repentance may soften a heart, but it cannot erase the consequence of an action. In the moral world of the Ramayana, confession brings dignity, yet suffering must still run its course. Dasharatha continued his narration to Kausalya. When the father reached the place where his son laid lifeless, he touched the boy’s body with trembling hands and spoke in deep anguish: ‘My son! Is it righteous that when I come near you, you do not rise and offer me respect? Why do you not speak? Why are you angry with me? Will you not embrace me and relieve our grief?’

‘Until now you were the one studying the sacred scriptures. Who will continue that learning now? Who will perform the Sandhya Rites, the sacred fire offerings, and the daily worship, and remain near me to serve me in my old age? Who will lovingly bring us roots and fruits from the forest and care for us with devotion? Is it right that you should abandon us and leave us orphaned in this forest? How can I bear your mother, who is helpless, blind, and worn with age? Do not go to the abode of Yama. At dawn we too shall follow you.’

‘Do you want to ask why we must come? Listen, separated from you, we cannot remain in this forest, wasting away in unbearable sorrow. You have committed no sin to deserve such a death in the bloom of youth. It is the sinful king who had killed you. By the power of my truth, you shall attain the heavenly worlds, just as the great kings Sagara, Dilipa, Nahusha, and Janamejaya attained them. You shall reach those realms where those who gave thousands of cows in charity attain. You shall go to the same blessed worlds reached by those who depart from their bodies at the sacred confluence of Rivers Ganga and Yamuna. No evil destiny shall befall you.’

The father’s lament carried not anger alone but the immense dignity of a life built upon truth, austerity, and devotion. In the Ramayana, the grief of the righteous often becomes a moral force powerful enough to shape destiny itself. As the sage wept, he offered the ritual waters to his departed son. At that moment the ascetic youth assumed a divine form and appeared in the sky, standing beside Indra. Addressing his parents, he said, ‘Knowers of Vedic Dharma! Because I faithfully served you, I have now attained happiness in the higher worlds. Therefore, do not grieve for me. Respected Virtuous Ones! You too will soon come to heaven and meet me there.’ Having spoken these words, he ascended to the celestial realms.

After their son departed to heaven in this manner, the sage returned to his dwelling along with his wife. There, noticing that Dasharatha standing before them with folded hands, overwhelmed with regret, the sage spoke with a heart, filled with grief and anger to him and said: ‘You made me a childless though I had only one son. I no longer fear death. Therefore, kill me as well this very moment. Without reason and out of ignorance you killed my son. Because of this, I shall pronounce upon you a terrible curse that will humble your pride. Just as I suffer the unbearable grief of losing my son, you too shall one day weep in the agony of separation from your own son and die of that sorrow.’

The sage continued: ‘Since the act was committed unknowingly, the dreadful sin of Brahma-Hatya will not fall upon you. Yet a lesser sin that requires punishment shall certainly cling to you. Just as the donor receives the fruit corresponding to the gift he offers, so too may the condition that has come upon us come upon you as well.’ In the moral universe of the Ramayana, even divine reassurance cannot erase the human pain left behind by loss. Words spoken in grief sometimes become the instruments through which destiny declares itself.

After recounting this, Dasharatha said to Kausalya, ‘Thus, they cursed me. Then, weeping in many ways for their son, they watched as I prepared the funeral pyre. Entering the fire together, they gave up their lives. What more can I say? Whenever I think about why such sorrow had come upon me now, this memory returns to my mind. That sin has followed me and is tormenting me in this manner. What more remains to be said? The words of that great sage became true. I am destined to die from the grief of separation from my son. My eyes can no longer see. I cannot even tell where you are standing. Therefore, touch me.’

Thus, trembling with fear of death and overwhelmed by sorrow, Dasharatha said these words while weeping: ‘Time may pass, but Karma does not forget. When its moment arrives, even kings must bow before its silent justice.’ That night Dasharatha lamented thus: ‘On that day I killed the son of a sage, and today in effect, brought about the death of my own son. Such a deed none but I could commit, and no other man would do so, nor could he. What Rama did in my case alone befits Rama, and no one else could act in such a manner. Is there any man lacking in wisdom who would abandon his own eldest son? And is there any son who would go to the forest merely because he was told to do so without reason?’

Dasharatha continued: ‘While I still live upon this earth, I long to behold Sri Rama once more. If only Rama’s hand were to touch me, if only I could see his face with my own eyes, I would have no need to go to the abode of Yama, and instead I would certainly live. But the messengers of Yama are calling me. At the moment when my life is leaving me, I cannot behold Sri Ramachandra with my own eyes. There can be no sorrow greater than this. My life-breaths are fading away. When Rama returns after fourteen years, only the truly meritorious and blessed will have the fortune to see him. My eyes no longer see. My ears no longer hear. My heart is shattered into pieces.’

Dasharatha further continued while weeping: ‘Ah! Rama! You whose face shines like the full moon! Ah! My beloved son! Alas! My protector! Where have you gone? Come, come, and relieve my suffering. May great merit be yours! Kausalya! Because of my sin, not only have I destroyed myself, but I have also caused you, to suffer the grief of losing your son. Sumitra! I have caused you much sorrow. Kaikeyi! Enemy in the guise of a loved one! Destroyer of our lineage! Is it not you who have brought this sorrow upon so many?’

Thus, lamenting and crying aloud, Dasharatha, lost in grief and thought, breathed his last at midnight. This was the event of the sixth night after Rama had departed to the forests. In the Ramayana, the fall of a king is not marked by the loss of power but by the breaking of a father’s heart. The story reminds that even the mightiest authority cannot shield a person from the consequences of emotional and moral choices.

When dawn approached, the maidens of the palace prepared the auspicious articles required for the king’s morning services and ceremonies. All arrangements were made with the customary signs of prosperity and good fortune. Yet, though the sun had already risen, the king did not come out as he usually did. Wondering what might be the cause, the women approached him with hesitation. They gently placed their hands upon him and softly touched his body in an attempt to awaken him. But they noticed none of the signs of sleep in him. His body felt cold. No breath came from his nostrils, and his heart was no longer beating. A fearful suspicion arose among the women that the king was no longer alive. Convinced at last that he died, they went in deep sorrow to inform Kausalya.

Great palaces may be filled with Splendour and ceremony, yet death enters them as silently as it enters the humblest home. Even though the women suspected that the king had passed away, they continued to weep beside him, hoping that Kausalya herself would come and confirm it. When Kausalya arrived and saw the king, she fainted. The other women, including Kaikeyi and Sumitra, were overcome with grief. Relatives and attendants gathered around the royal body and began to lament loudly.

Placing the king’s head upon her lap, Kausalya spoke bitterly to Kaikeyi: ‘O woman of cruel heart! Now that your heart must surely be satisfied, rule this kingdom freely and enjoy its wealth and pleasures without fear of anyone. Unable to bear your conduct, the king had died. Sri Rama was driven to the forests. Your desires were fulfilled. From now on, whatever games you wish to play, none will oppose you? How can I continue to live in this city, still breathing, after losing both my husband and my son?’ Grief often seeks a face to blame, and in moments of overwhelming loss, sorrow can turn even the noblest hearts toward harsh words. 

Kausalya continued to speak: ‘Kaikeyi, driven by harshness, reduced the noble Raghu dynasty to ashes. All this happened because of Manthara. When King Janaka hears that Dasharatha, heeding the words of his wife, had sent Sri Rama to the forest along with Sita, how deeply will he grieve? In Ayodhya the king had died, and I stand helpless, weeping in sorrow, yet Rama, who dwells in the forest, knows nothing of it. What meaning can be found in such events? And how many hardships must Sita be enduring in the forest? She too must be suffering greatly. King Janaka, on knowing of this, will wither away in grief. As for me, I shall follow my husband and offer this body into the sacred fire through Saha Gamana.’

In moments of unbearable loss, the mind searches for meaning, often moving between grief, blame, and despair. The epic here reflects the raw human response to tragedy, reminding that sorrow can overwhelm even the most dignified hearts. While Kausalya was lamenting thus, those who were knowledgeable in matters of governance arrived. They consoled her as best they could and placed the king’s body in a large vessel filled with oil for preservation. Thereafter they began to deliberate about the duties that must follow. Since not even one of the king’s sons was present nearby, instead of performing the cremation rites, they instructed the attendants to safeguard the royal body carefully.

The body was kept within the palace for the time being. Seeing the king’s body lying preserved in oil, the women of the inner palace began to weep bitterly. Everywhere in the city people shed tears. Noble women wept in grief. The city no longer seemed like Ayodhya at all. All the wives of Dasharatha were immersed in sorrow. The sun set and darkness spread across the land. Meanwhile the people freely cursed and condemned Kaikeyi. The grief of a kingdom mirrors the grief of a household. When a righteous ruler falls, the sorrow of the palace flows outward into the streets and becomes the sorrow of the people.

On the eighth day after Sri Rama departed for the forest, the senior Brahmins who held the authority to decide matters of kingship assembled in council. Among them were Gautama, Maudgalya, Katyayana, Markandeya, Jabali, Kashyapa, Vamadeva, and other ministers. Gathering in the royal assembly, they addressed the great sage Vasishta and said, ‘Since the king had died and none of the princes are present in Ayodhya, it is necessary that one among the noble princes be appointed as the ruler of this city. If this is not done, the kingdom may fall into grave disorder.’ The Ramayana quietly reminds that governance cannot remain vacant for long. When leadership disappears, wise counsel must step forward to preserve order and protect society.

They all said that: ‘If there is no king to rule the land, even though clouds gather and thunder roars with lightning, the rains will not fall at the proper time. When there is no ruler over the earth, farmers will not sow seeds during the season for planting. Even if crops grow, there will be no confidence that the grain will reach the home without fear of thieves. Because of rogues and robbers, fear will prevail everywhere. When there is no sovereign authority, each person acts as he pleases, cutting down trees and destroying them, and therefore pleasant gardens cannot exist.

They continued: ‘Low and unruly people enter and defile places, and thus fields cannot remain protected. Since minds will not remain steady, people will not attend assemblies. In a land where no king rules, Brahmins, having lost faith, will not perform sacrifices. Out of fear of thieves, even those who possess wealth will hesitate to give charity or offer gifts. When the land falls into anarchy, even if actors and dancers exist, festivals and public celebrations will not appear joyful. Officials, taking bribes, will not settle disputes with justice.’

‘Because of this, merchants will not be able to conduct trade profitably. Without a king to govern, citizens cannot remain mentally at ease, and people will not gather freely to share stories or converse. Out of fear of wicked men, even women will not adorn themselves. When there is no king to protect the people, young men and women will not dress in ornaments and enjoy themselves in gardens during the evenings. Wives will not ride in chariots with their husbands to pleasant groves to gather flowers. In a kingdom without a ruler, people will not sleep with their doors open after sunset, for fear of thieves.’

‘In a city without a king, great elephants adorned with bells will not move proudly along the royal roads. In such a city the reverberating sound of bowstrings during the practice of archery will no longer be heard. In a land without a king, merchants who travel to distant countries will not safely return to their homes. They will suffer attacks from robbers along the roads. In a country without governance, even a wandering ascetic will not travel alone. Having no patron to sustain him, he must sleep wherever night falls. In a realm without order there is no merit, no prosperity, and no security.’

‘Armies that go to battle will be defeated by their enemies, for they will have no brave leader to guide them. In a country without a king, people cannot move about freely and happily upon elephants, horses, chariots, or other vehicles. In a land without a king, even if people study the sacred scriptures with diligence, they will not feel free to display their learning among sages in forests, gardens, or on the banks of rivers. Where there is no ruler to provide protection, citizens will hesitate to go to temples carrying flower garlands, offerings, and gifts for the worship of the gods.’

‘In a kingdom without governance, princes themselves will not move about with comfort, anointed with sandal paste and enjoying their lives. While the king was alive, we conducted ourselves without ever transgressing your command, just as the ocean never crosses its shoreline. What more need be said now? Therefore, considering the welfare of the world, appoint a ruler for this kingdom. If there is no king, the state will soon become like a wilderness. This truth is already known to you. Hence decide that one among the sons of Dasharatha should be installed as king.’

The sages thus spoke not merely of royal authority but of social order itself: when justice and leadership collapse, every layer of society, from agriculture to culture, slowly begins to crumble. Their words reveal a profound insight: political stability is not merely about power, but about the invisible assurance that allows ordinary life, such as, trade, travel, learning, and celebration to flourish. Thus, the elders reminded the assembly that a kingdom without leadership quickly descends into chaos, and that the responsibility of choosing a just ruler is itself an act of service to the welfare of society.

The elders of Ayodhya placed before the assembly a truth that had been confirmed many times in the history of kingdoms, that, a land cannot remain without a ruler even for a short time. Just as a chariot cannot move without a charioteer, a kingdom cannot function without a king who safeguards justice, order, and the welfare of the people. The death of Dasharatha left not only a grieving family but also a vulnerable kingdom. Rama, the rightful heir, was far away in the forest. Lakshmana accompanied him. Shatrughna was absent.

Bharata, who knew nothing of these events, was still in the land of his maternal relatives. In this uncertain moment the responsibility for preserving stability fell upon the sages and ministers who guided the affairs of the state. Their deliberation was not merely political. It reflected a deeper principle repeatedly emphasized in the Ramayana, that is, the well-being of society depends upon righteous leadership. When a just ruler governs with wisdom and restraint, prosperity, culture, and harmony flourish. When authority collapses, even the most ordinary rhythms of life: agriculture, trade, worship, and celebration, begin to disintegrate.



Therefore, the elders urged Vasishta that, one of Dasharatha’s sons be installed on the throne without delay, so that the kingdom of Ayodhya might not drift into disorder. With this solemn appeal, the council prepared to take the next step that would shape the destiny of the kingdom. The passing of Dasharatha marked the end of one era in Ayodhya. Yet within the sorrow of that moment lay the beginning of events that would ultimately reveal the greatness of Rama’s destiny and the enduring ideals of dharma that the Ramayana seeks to illuminate.

>>>>> Photographs Courtesy Rama Bhakta Vijaya Raghava Dasu

{{From my Published Book ‘Simplified and Faithful Rendering of the Adi Kavya’

Valmiki Ramayana: The Greatest Epic (Bala and Ayodhya Kandas)}}

(This Book is free of cost for all those who are interested to read the English Version of Valmiki Ramayana, provided they collect it from me in person preferably. Mobile: 8008137012)

Saturday, October 31, 2026

‘Commitment to the Republic-A Life in the service of People’ >>>> 30th FETE-Friday Evening Team Meet >>>> Shailendra Joshi, Veteran IAS Officer as Guest : Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao

 ‘Commitment to the Republic-

A Life in the service of People’

30th FETE-Friday Evening Team Meet 

On October 30, 2026)

Shailendra Joshi, Veteran IAS Officer as Guest

Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao

There are unique moments when professional camaraderie and administrative history converge to reveal the true inner workings of statecraft. Such an occasion unfolded during a memorable evening of intellectual dialogue, where a routine gathering of Like-Minded senior media veterans transformed into a profound masterclass on public service. It was here, inspired by firsthand conversations, that the deep administrative philosophy behind Commitment to the Republic was truly brought to life.

The 30th Consecutive gathering of like-minded journalist friends at the Press Club Hyderabad was graced by veteran IAS officer Dr Shailendra Joshi. An alumnus of IIT Roorkee and IIT Delhi, Dr Joshi joined the civil services in erstwhile Andhra Pradesh. He served in a wide spectrum of key assignments across the state, punctuated by a central deputation to the Ministry of Environment and Forests. He eventually retired as the Chief Secretary of Telangana during the tenure of Chief Minister K Chandrashekhar Rao (KCR).

Exceptionally gifted with deep expertise in irrigation infrastructure, he handled this vital sector with unequalled success, continuing to steer the subject with precision even while serving as Chief Secretary. Government of Telangana represented by the then CM KCR signed three agreements with Maharashtra Government represented by its CM Devendra Fadnavis on 23rd August 2016 paving way for constructing three barrages across Penganga, Pranahita and Godavari rivers at Chanakha-Korata, Tumbidihatti and Medigadda respectively.  

Barrage across Pranahita at Tumbidihatti in Adilabad district will be of 148-metre full reservoir level (FRL), at Medigadda in Karimnagar across the Godavari will be of 100-metre FRL and at Chanakha-Korata in Adilabad across Penganga river will be of 213-metre FRL. Joshi Ji was the Special Chief Secretary of the Irrigation and Command Area Development Department then, and accompanied the Telangana delegation to Mumbai for the signing of the historic inter-state water agreement. This is still fresh in my memory.

As the former Chief Public Relations Officer (CPRO) to CM KCR, I had the privilege of working in close association with Joshi Ji. His ever-jovial approach toward me and to that matter with everyone he interacted, was a source of immense delight. His signature smile is truly unique, mirroring his inherent simplicity, modesty, humility, and friendly nature. When I mentioned about our Friday Evening Team (FETE) meetings to him the day before and explained the spirit of camaraderie behind them, he readily accepted my invitation.

Joshi Ji generously spent close to two hours with us, warmly sharing mutual experiences and insights. Alongside myself, senior journalists including GK Murthy, NV Hanumanth Rao, and a regular guest Dr Bharat Babu participated in the evening’s discourse. Unfortunately, torrential rains lashed most parts of Hyderabad, preventing at least half a dozen regular participants from joining us, and their absence was deeply felt. Amar, however called from Warangal and spoke to Joshi Ji over phone explaining reasons for his inability to participate.

Zakir, a senior journalist and who knew Joshi Ji personally for a long time, and who is known for making a definitive difference with his compelling articles, joined us briefly. However, before we could capture the moment in a photograph, he politely excused himself to join friends at an adjacent table. While the other participants enjoyed their usual social drinks, Joshi Ji sat comfortably over a fresh lime juice. He proved to be unhesitatingly outspoken, yet he spoke with utmost objectivity, impartiality, and subtlety on changing governance scenarios over time reflecting a perfect ‘Bureaucrat Statesman.’

He shared deep reflections on the political, social, and financial landscapes, focusing heavily on irrigation projects. This was natural, as he was the very person who steered the subject both before and during his tenure as Chief Secretary, managing it with unparalleled expertise and commitment, perhaps longer than any other officer, in perfect alignment with his stellar character. According to him he spent over 600-900 hours in taking forward the policy directive of the then Chief Minister KCR and Irrigation Minister Harish Rao, having believed that what they conceived and planned to put into implementation was cent percent correct.

He however, while narrating few highlights of all that happened concisely, precisely, comprehensively, but with precision and confidence, suggested to read his book, especially the relevant paragraphs. The beautifully cover designed book from Sakal Publications, and is authored by him titled: ‘Commitment to the Republic: A Life in the Service of People’ was presented to us the participants of the FETE meeting. The ever-enthusiastic and the best of the Photo Journalists, dear Anil who on seeing Joshi Ji came to the table, clicked us for a photograph, the exalted privilege part of the 30th FETE assembly.

when I had gone through the Book immediately on returning home, especially chapters on Telangana, my instant appreciation knew no bounds. The book as a whole and irrigation related chapters are simply Great. Interestingly the introduction is written by Arun Tiwari, a missile scientist who led the Civilian Spinoff of the Defense Technology Programme, which included developing indigenous coronary stents. Tiwari to his credit coauthored ‘Wings of Fire’ the celebrated autobiography of Dr APJ Abdul kalam.

The book ‘Commitment to the Republic’ highlights the primary focus of the text: a first-person record of public service by Shailendra Joshi Ji (Veteran IAS Officer: as the author preferred), framed through a narrative (termed so by author) written by Arun Tiwari. As I understand, in addition to the Core Title, ‘Commitment to the Republic’ the subtitle, a significant speciality of the book: ‘A Life in the Service of People’ anchors the book's narrative structure, explicitly framing it around Joshi Ji's four decades of frontline administrative career, and ‘Narrative by Arun Tiwari’ perhaps emphasizes his role as the collaborative writer.

The essence of the book is reflected in the previews of eight high level acclaimed bureaucrats of Indian Administrative Service as detailed below, besides the invaluable Introduction by Arun Tiwari. Let me quote few specially priceless sentences (forming part of an equally irreplaceable paragraph) from out of his introduction.

‘The book is a reflective guide to governance, leadership, and nation-building. It offers readers, especially present and future civil servants, a rare inside view into the machinery of the Indian State: its moral burdens, institutional complexities, political negotiations, and transformative possibilities. It demonstrates that the IAS is not simply an elite career; it is one of humanity’s grandest experiments, where intellect must be harmonized with courage, compassion, and ethical purpose.’ And of course, more.

Instead of going into exact verbatim texts of the specific Previews, let me review the essence of these introductory commentaries written by these eight highly distinguished public figures and veteran bureaucrats. Beginning with Dr Mohan Kanda (Formerly Chief Secretary of undivided Andhra Pradesh) and concluding with Arvind Mehta (Veteran IAS officer and formerly Secretary to the 15th Finance Commission), these previews serve as institutional validation for Shailendra Joshi’s core thesis on democratic statecraft.

Collectively, these commentaries frame the narrative not just as a personal memoir, but as a textbook on administrative resilience and constitutional morality. The senior dignitaries highlight how the book bridges the gap between theoretical policy and real-world execution, particularly focusing on handling institutional friction and maintaining political neutrality. By anchoring the previews between seasoned leaders like Kanda and Mehta, the book sets a high-level administrative tone, positioning Joshi's reflections as essential wisdom for navigating the future governance demands of a developing India.

Others who contributed their views include: Dr Prodipto Ghosh, Former Secretary Ministry of Environment, Forests, and Climate Change; Ajay Mishra, Former Special Chief Secretary, Government of Telangana; Atul Bagai, Former Indian Administrative Service Officer and Country head of India, United Nations Environment Program; Dr Rajesh Kumar Singh, Former Indian Administrative Service Officer and Professor Iowa State University (USA); Rina Ray, Former Secretary School Education, Government of India; and Richa Mishra, Senior Journalist.

The Book is in four parts: Becoming, Serving, Leading, and Legacy. The first two have five topics each: A Small Town, Large Sky, The First Ascent, The Hinterlands Within, Under a Wider Canopy, When the Ground Shifted, Many Worlds One Planet, Two Sides of One Coin, The Grammar of Local Action, The Telangana Experiment, and the Telangana Renaissance. The next two have four topics each: The Arteries of Democracy. Democracy Within Reach, The Geography of Renewal, At the Fountainhead, The Commitment Within, The Ethics of Public Service, The Civil Servant for Viksit Bharat, and the Republic at Sunrise.

The thematic layout of these ‘Four Chapters and Eighteen Topics’ reveals a deeply deliberate, almost lyrical taxonomy of administrative evolution, mapped directly onto the trajectory of a human life in service. By consciously partitioning the text into four sequential chapters: Becoming, Serving, Leading, and Legacy, the author constructs a narrative arc that mirrors the psychological and professional maturation of an ideal public servant.

The eighteen topics themselves operate as profound conceptual anchors; they are intuitive yet intellectual, striking a delicate balance between the granular realities of grassroots governance and the lofty ideals of constitutional philosophy. From the evocative imagery of A Small Town, Large Sky to the systemic gravity of The Arteries of Democracy, this nomenclature acts as an immediate cognitive map. It signals to the reader that included me, exactly where they stand on the spectrum of statecraft, translating complex institutional mechanics into a legible, deeply engaging human journey.

Consequently, this precise and intuitive framing exerts a powerful, almost magnetic pull on the reader, compelling an immediate and uninterrupted immersion into the text. The taxonomy of topics is so evocative and logically structured that it demystifies the bureaucratic apparatus, allowing an engaged reader to grasp the essence of each administrative milestone before even turning the page. This inherent readability transforms the book into a highly accessible piece of literature, structured perfectly to accommodate the rhythms of a busy professional life.

Whether one chooses to consume the volume in a single, uninterrupted reading session or in disciplined instalments, the boundaries between the eighteen topics are so clearly defined that returning to the text feels entirely seamless. The inevitable breaks in reading are dictated purely by the necessities of daily routine, leaving the reader eager to cross back over the threshold into Joshi Ji's world at the next available moment, the way I did. What impressed me most is the way the author presented his Acknowledgements part at the end, unlike what many do in the beginning.

Joshi Ji’s first and foremost acknowledgement is to the God Almighty: ‘By the grace of Mahadev, an ordinary life, lived with gratitude, faith, and sense of purpose, has unfolded into an extraordinary journey.’ In sequence it is to his parents: ‘Born into humble circumstances, I was shaped by perseverance, faith, and the enduring values instilled in me by my parents. I remain profoundly grateful for their sacrifices, guidance, and blessings, which gave me the confidence and resilience.’

Then Joshi Ji acknowledged his Gurus, his wife Anuradha, his daughter Rhea, Arun Tiwari who wrote introduction, the editorial team: Ashutosh Ramgir, Nupur J, Madhumita Shinde, and Sneha Makharia. He then mentioned about the dedication of the book to his colleagues and friends. Joshi Ji concluded with his sincere appreciation for the institutions and administrative framework that gave him the opportunity to serve the public with integrity, courage, and commitment throughout his career.      

The structural decision to position the Acknowledgements at the final threshold of the book, rather than at its introduction, is a profound testament to Shailendra Joshi Ji’s administrative mindset and philosophical humility. In traditional literature, an opening acknowledgement often sets a transactional tone, functioning as a preface of obligations. By placing it at the very end, Joshi Ji transforms the section into a reflective culmination: a closing prayer of gratitude that can only be fully articulated after the entire arc of a forty-year journey has been laid bare.

It signals to the reader that the achievements detailed in Becoming, Serving, Leading, and Legacy were never the products of isolated individual ambition, but were instead the fruits of a deeply interconnected ecosystem of divine grace, ancestral values, familial sacrifice, and institutional trust. When analyzing his specific sequence of gratitude, we gain an intimate look into the foundational pillars that sustained his tenured career. Beginning with his submission to Mahadev, he establishes that his administrative resilience was anchored in a spiritual core.

Thus, he is viewing a high-profile bureaucratic life not through the lens of power, but as ‘an ordinary life, lived with gratitude.’ This spiritual anchor is immediately tied to his foundational roots: his parents, acknowledging that the confidence required to handle high-stakes state reengineering was forged early on through their humble sacrifices. As the sequence flows meticulously through his Gurus, his wife Anuradha, his daughter Rhea, his collaborative narrative partner Arun Tiwari, and the editorial team, it beautifully transitions into a collective tribute to his colleagues and friends.

Most notably, his concluding appreciation for the institutional framework itself reveals the ultimate grace of a true civil servant: a deep, abiding respect for the Republic and the administrative machinery that allowed him to serve with uncompromised integrity, courage, and commitment. He is absolutely right. Having personally known Dr Shailendra Kumar Joshi for ten long years, when I was working as CPRO to CM KCR, I had the unique opportunity to closely observe his meticulous handling of complex irrigation subjects.

This was especially true during a transformative era when Telangana, under the leadership of its first Chief Minister, K Chandrashekhar Rao (KCR), underwent a massive administrative and technical reengineering of its water resources. From the very day KCR took charge of the newly carved-out state: a territory explicitly formed on the foundational tagline of delivering water for drinking and irrigation, Joshi Ji stood at the administrative helm of these flagship engineering initiatives.

As we proceed further into the text to examine his mind, the specific topics within these chapters vividly mirror his real-world experiences. For instance, in topics like ‘The Telangana Experiment, The Telangana Renaissance, and The Geography of Renewal,’ the reader encounters firsthand the immense tactical foresight required to shift a state’s entire irrigation landscape. By examining his reflections through the lens of his actual career, we can see how the theoretical ideals of public service were tested and forged in the high-stakes laboratories of active governance.

Since it is neither correct nor ethical on my part to reveal the content in excessive detail, as it remains the absolute prerogative of the interested reader to obtain a copy and experience it for better comprehension, I will share only its core essence. In The Telangana Experiment, Joshi Ji profoundly notes: ‘History seldom moves in a straight line. It advances through long periods of apparent stability before suddenly shifting gears.’ This powerful premise precedes his gripping narrative of the tragic helicopter accident that led to the untimely demise of the then AP CM Dr YS Rajasekhara Reddy.

Joshi Ji then discusses, the sudden disruption of political stability in the state, KCR’s historic fast unto death, the formulation of the Sri Krishna Committee, and the eventual formation of Telangana. Joshi Ji then documents his allotment to the Telangana Cadre and the subsequent entrustment of irrigation responsibilities to him in due course. He beautifully navigates through the ‘Spirit of Telangana,’ its unique history, its governance model, and vital reflections tailored for a future civil servant operating within the Telangana context.

The Telangana Renaissance follows this, housing precious sub-topics that begin with the brilliant chapter, ‘Rediscovering the Kakatiyas.’ Here, he observes: ‘What impressed me most was that the Kakatiyas appeared to understand a principle that modern environmental science has only recently begun to articulate with precision.’ Armed with this deep conviction, he notes that when Telangana emerged as a separate state, the challenge was not simply to erect new infrastructure. As an engineer himself, this realization resonated deeply with him.

Joshi Ji writes: ‘Engineering is often associated with innovation. The renaissance that Telangana sought was therefore not a return to the past, but a rediscovery of principles that had never ceased to be relevant.’ Through the compelling subtitles that follow: ‘Water as Statecraft, Restoring a Living System, Mission Kakatiya, and The Renaissance Begins,’ Joshi Ji meticulously charts the journey from KCR’s grand political vision to the actual on-ground execution of Mission Kakatiya.

‘Those years of realizing and implementing Mission Kakatiya also taught me that a tank is never merely a body of water. It is part of a watershed. A healthy watershed replenishes groundwater. Groundwater nourishes agriculture. Agriculture sustains livelihoods. Livelihoods strengthen communities, and resilient communities become the foundation of a prosperous society.’ What an incredibly visionary observation! The next vital topic forming part of the third chapter is ‘The Geography of Renewal.’ I intentionally leave the bulk of this to the reader to discover firsthand, choosing to highlight only its broad, salient features here.

These features encompass the Godavari and Krishna River systems; geographical realities acting as economic and social determinants; and the reality of the Telangana state region sitting well beyond the reach of natural gravity. This dictated a profound shift in perspective, ultimately leading to the spectacular emergence of the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation (KLI) project ‘through science, reengineering, and democratic governance.’ Joshi Ji’s conceptual framing here is an administrator par excellence, yet his intellectual objectivity remains fiercely intact.

His balanced perspective is beautifully captured in his own words: ‘Whether such an undertaking ultimately fulfilled all its aspirations remains a subject for continuing technical evaluation and public debate. Yet, its conception itself illustrates an enduring principle of Democratic State Craft. Geography influences history, but it does not imprison it. Societies progress when they possess the courage to question inherited limitations, the wisdom to respect natural laws, and the institutional capacity to translate scientific imagination into public purpose.’

Thus, he seamlessly concludes: ‘It is in this larger spirit that the story of Kaleshwaram deserves to be understood: not merely as an engineering project, but as an exploration of how democratic societies seek to enlarge the possibilities that geography appears to deny.’ The accompanying subtitles: ‘Reengineering the Godavari, Building one of the World’s Largest Lift Irrigation Systems, Great Engineering Requires Great Accountability, and Engineering Beyond Geography,’ depict such captivating, thought-provoking information that it becomes abundantly clear: other than Joshi Ji, none could have written this monumental account.

As I sat among my colleague journalists at the Press Club Hyderabad for our 30th Friday Evening Team (FETE) meeting on October 30, 2026, the table was charged with a shared intellectual energy. This regular gathering of like-minded minds has always been a sanctuary for deep, unvarnished discourse. However, having Dr Shailendra Kumar Joshi join us as our special non-member guest elevated the evening into something truly unforgettable. Listening to the conversation and later immersing myself in the pages of his book, I felt a profound sense of responsibility.

Having personally known Joshi Ji for ten long years, and watching him meticulously steer the state's irrigation destiny from the very inception of Telangana, I knew I could not write a conventional review. My perspective had to capture the rare administrative soul of a man I saw translating a historic political struggle into physical reality. For my equivalent bibliophiles and book lovers, I view this text not as a dry, bureaucratic logbook, but as an absolute treasure hunt of statecraft.

In my reading, I purposefully chose to honor the author's prerogative by withholding the granular technical secrets, focusing instead on the lyrical beauty of his prose. When Joshi Ji writes about history ‘Shifting Gears,’ he is inviting us into an epic narrative of a land rewriting its own destiny. What struck me most deeply was his vision of the village tank: not merely as a body of water, but as the starting domino in an interconnected ecosystem that ultimately sustains human livelihood and fortifies entire communities.

I am certain that any true lover of literature will find this book an essential, gripping addition to their collection, bridging the gap between philosophy and human resilience. To the political analysts and policy critiques, I offer a challenge rooted in what I discovered to be the rarest quality in modern administrative writing: uncompromising intellectual objectivity. In my analysis of his chapters on the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation project, I was deeply moved by Joshi Ji's refusal to hide behind public relations spin. He does not demand blind praise; instead, he openly welcomes ‘Continuing Technical Evaluation and Public Debate.’

I want our community of critiques to recognize that this memoir is not a defensive exercise in self-congratulation. It is an honest, scientifically rigorous exploration of democratic statecraft. It demands that we view monumental engineering achievements not through a hyper-partisan lens, but as the story of a society that possessed the sheer courage to defy its inherited geographical limitations. Most of all, my journey through these seven chapters crystallized into a profound instructional manual for the next generation of civil servants.

Through my unique vantage point of watching Joshi Ji work alongside CM KCR from day one, I saw the ideal division of democratic labor perfectly mirrored in his writing. The political leadership defined the grand, raw vision, delivering water to a newly carved state, but it was the bureaucrat who engineered the reality. Joshi Ji shows young officers how to look backward into history to ‘Rediscover the Kakatiyas’ and ‘Engineering Beyond Geography’ in order to innovate forward into the future. While geography might write the opening chapter of a state's history, a values-driven administrator par excellence holds the pen to write the rest.

Last, but not least, this brings to mind January 2020, when CM KCR personally organized the book release of the late HJ Dora, former DGP. As the CPRO witnessing that grand gathering where top serving and retired IAS, IPS, and IFS officers attended the program, received free copies, I believe that remains the ultimate way to honor institutional legacies. If a veteran IPS could be celebrated with such state warmth by KCR, a similar honor is richly deserved for Joshi Ji, Telangana's Fourth Chief Secretary. Replicating that grand gesture for Commitment to the Republic would beautifully inspire our emerging bureaucracy, felt FETE.

Tuesday, October 27, 2026

Professions, Checkered Career, and Lessons-17>>>> With Satyam Computers Ramalinga Raju and CEO Venkat Changavalli (My Tenth Job): Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao

 TENTH JOB AS LEAD PARTNER 

AND CONSULTANT IN EMRI-5

With Satyam Computers Ramalinga Raju 

and CEO Venkat Changavalli

Professions, Checkered Career, and Lessons-17

Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao (October 28, 2026)

After Erstwhile Andhra Pradesh, the first state to launch 108-Ambulance Emergency Response Services was Gujarat, and the credit for being appointed as the head of EMRI operations there and for developing them in a short span of time belongs in total to Gobind Lulla. A graduate in engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai, and a gold medalist MBA from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, Gobind Lulla had accumulated nearly thirty years of senior management experience in various multinational corporations before joining EMRI.

As a result of the strong rapport he built with the Gujarat Government, EMRI was allotted government land near Ahmedabad for its office. Gobind Lulla’s contribution to constructing it on par with the Hyderabad office was remarkable. He worked tirelessly to provide emergency services to the people of Gujarat in a manner no less effective than in Andhra Pradesh. His selection was made personally by Venkat (who was also Lulla’s Classmate) and Chairman Raju. However, within just three months of the change in management, there was no longer a place for Lulla in the organization, and his experience was lost to EMRI.

From the time Sanjay Kshirsagar joined EMRI, he not only enforced strict financial discipline but also fearlessly and forthrightly stood in opposition to every matter that violated established norms, much to the displeasure of management. Before joining the organization, he had accumulated nearly fifteen years of extensive experience in the finance and accounts departments of various national and multinational companies. At EMRI, his role was not confined to finance alone. He also actively supported me in the expansion of emergency services to other states. With his departure, EMRI also lost his valuable experience in streamlining and strengthening its financial systems.

Meanwhile, in the context of a Public Interest Litigation filed against EMRI, a prominent national English weekly, Outlook, published an article in its January 26, 2009 issue, raising several issues related to the theory and practice of Government, the PPP. The article alleged that, in the wake of the Satyam Scam, investigative agencies had begun scrutinizing all organizations believed to be associated with Raju, that although attempts were made to remove information related to Satyam Computer Services’ affiliate companies from websites, it was not possible to isolate EMRI.

It wrote that ‘Unethical Methods’ were adopted to expand Raju-owned 108 Emergency Services to other states, officials were influenced to manipulate ‘Tenders and Expressions of Interest’ in EMRI’s favor, and as a result, ‘Large Budgetary Allocations’ were secured from the respective state governments. The article further stated that EMRI, which began its journey in AP on August 15, 2005, with just 30 ambulances, grew to operate 652 ambulances, with the government bearing 95 percent of the operational cost, amounting to ₹1,12,000 per ambulance per month, while EMRI contributed only the remaining 5 percent.

From there, it alleged, EMRI went on to grow rapidly by influencing the ‘Tender’ process in other states. The article also accused that, ‘Jwala Narasimha Rao (myself),’ who was then functioning as the Lead Partner of the Public Private Partnership Subject, and later as a Consultant, of maintaining continuous contact with the Secretary of the Tamil Nadu State Health Department (PWC Davidar) and shaping the contents of the government’s proposed tender advertisement in a manner favorable to EMRI. As evidence, the article claimed that it possessed email communications exchanged between the two of us.

It also referred to certain matters related to the states of Madhya Pradesh and Punjab. The same article published my initial clarification along with the article, stating that there was nothing unethical in these actions. It further alleged that, in drafting the tenders, the eligibility requirements regarding experience in operating emergency services were framed to match EMRI’s existing experience. In addition, several other allegations were made in the article. However, to date, that magazine has not dared to publish the letter I sent, which provided detailed explanations addressing every single allegation raised. Well, whether the article was a compliment or blame, I am yet to understand.

While this was so, during the period when Ramalinga Raju was EMRI Chairman, whose review meetings barring one or two, I attended, the cumulative experiences I gained from that phase would not be an exaggeration to describe as a ‘Genuine Encyclopedia of Learning.’ They were a level above the CEO Venkat review meetings. Venkat used to head the team of leaders reporting to him, and would attend the Chairman’s review meetings. He would first brief the Chairman on his own review meetings. Chairman used to seek clarifications and ask questions, directly from the accompanying leaders. Every precaution was taken to ensure that emergency services were delivered without the slightest lapse.

The unparalleled hospitality extended to us during meetings held at Raju’s residence is something that, I can never forget. Be it breakfast, lunch, or dinner, Ramalinga Raju would personally serve food to each individual, handing over plates, and ensuring that everyone relished. Throughout the duration of Raju’s review meetings, while all aspects were discussed systematically, whenever financial matters came up, he would strategically say, ‘Let us discuss these matters at leisure, taking quality time, Venkat.’

The most important person in EMRI was Venkat Changavalli who was an inspiration, a team builder, and a true Leader to leaders. After over a decade, as CEO in a ‘German Multi National Company’ Venkat ‘Closed the chapter there carrying with him lessons in Leadership, Growth, and the Art of Creating a Lasting Symphony’ to join the first ever Successful Public Private Partnership (PPP) Model, EMRI founded by Ramalinga Raju. Destiny had something best stored for him. 

During a Management Event in Chennai, Chief Guest Ramalinga Raju instantaneously recognized the potential of Venkat’s Leadership Qualities, abilities, and extended an offer to be CEO of EMRI. His offer led to a momentous decision by Venkat to ‘Relinquish his Lavish Lifestyle and Substantial Salary in favor of the opportunity to give back to society.’ He recalled that ‘Raju and I worked Synchronously, each contributing our unique strengths to a shared Vision of saving a Million Lives Each Year.’ His efforts as CEO, lead to stabilization of 108 services in PPP model. After serving for six years, he had to quit the job.  And his review meetings mad all the difference.

Having worked with a Governor (Kumud Ben Joshi) and Chief Minister (Dr M Channa Reddy) of the erstwhile Andhra Pradesh, and also with the first Chief Minister of Telangana State (K Chandrashekhar Rao) for nearly 15 years, and having attended various meetings chaired by them on a variety of subjects, I experienced the importance of ‘Review Meetings.’ Unquestionably every ‘Organizational Review Meeting’ serves as a ‘Critical Pillar’ in smooth functioning and development of an Organization. 

This is especially applicable in case of unique ‘Non-Profit Organization’ like the ‘108 Emergency Response Services.’ However, the ‘Rider’ shall be, the efficiency and effectiveness of the person who conducts such a ‘Review Meeting’ makes a difference. Venkat Changavalli as CEO of ‘Emergency Management Response Service (EMRI)’ with whom I worked for about four years, with his ‘Unparalleled Review Meetings’ embossed the ‘Hallmark of EMRI Growth Trajectory.’ (Details of Venkat’s Review Meetings in next post please)

{{From my Forthcoming Book

PROFESSIONS, CHECKERED CAREER, AND LESSONS

(From Librarian to CPRO to CM KCR)

A Journey from Khangi School to Center for Excellence}}