Monday, June 8, 2026

Simplified and faithful rendering of the Adi Kavya-26 >>>>> The Celestial Wedding of Sita and Rama >>>>> A Contemporary Retelling from Valmiki Ramayana: Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao

 The Celestial Wedding of Sita and Rama

A Contemporary Retelling from Valmiki Ramayana

Simplified and faithful rendering of the Adi Kavya-26

Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao

The preceding articles in this ongoing series traced the spiritual, moral, and narrative arc that culminates in one of the most luminous moments of the Valmiki Ramayana: the wedding of Sri Rama and Sita. This episode is not merely a royal ceremony or a familial alliance, but it is a cosmic affirmation of dharma, balance, and divine purpose expressed through human relationships. For modern readers, especially Indian readers across the world who engage with the epic in English, this moment offers enduring insights into partnership, responsibility, and shared moral vision.

After Janaka narrated his lineage and after he offered his two daughters, Sita and Urmila, in marriage to Rama and Lakshmana, Vasishta and Vishvamitra declared that both Ikshvaku and Videha lineages were equally commendable and illustrious, standing supreme among royal houses. They affirmed that in beauty, virtue, and mutual suitability, Rama and Lakshmana were perfectly matched with Sita and Urmila respectively. They then proposed that Kushadhvaja’s daughters, Mandavi, and Shrutakirti, be married to Bharata and Shatrughna respectively. This declaration reflects an ancient yet timeless principle that, marriages are not merely personal choices, but harmonies of values, families, and shared ideals.

Janaka instantly accepted the proposal and proclaimed that all four weddings would be conducted on the same auspicious day. Citing expert astrologers, he selected the sacred period when both Purva Phalguni and Uttara Phalguni stars were present, with the latter presided over by Bhaga, the deity of progeny and prosperity. Thus, Janaka resolved to solemnize the weddings at a time symbolizing continuity, abundance, and cosmic harmony.
Even today, the emphasis on choosing meaningful moments reminds of the human desire to align personal milestones with larger rhythms of time and belief.

Rising from his throne, Janaka approached Vishvamitra and Vasishta with deep reverence, expressing that their counsel was an act of supreme grace, binding him forever as their disciple. He invited them to preside over the thrones of Mithila, Ayodhya, and his brother’s kingdom, declaring that Mithila belonged to Dasharatha as much as Ayodhya belonged to him. Janaka requested the sages to guide the marriages so that, they would be conducted in the noblest manner. This gesture highlights leadership rooted in humility, an enduring lesson for governance in any age.

Dasharatha, overwhelmed with joy, returned to his guest palace and began the preliminary rites associated with marriage. Summoning his sons, he performed generous acts of charity, gifting four hundred thousand milk-yielding cows, along with brass milking vessels for each son, as prescribed by tradition. Numerous gifts were also distributed to Brahmins. Charity before celebration underscores the belief that personal happiness is most meaningful when it uplifts the wider community.

On the same day, the son of the Kekaya king, Bharata’s maternal uncle, arrived in Mithila via Ayodhya. The following morning, Dasharatha entered the Vedic ritual hall with his sons, led by Vasishta and other sages. The ceremonial rites connected with the sacred marriage thread and allied observances were duly performed. Family presence and collective participation transform individual unions into shared cultural memories.

As they entered, Vasishta reminded Janaka that Dasharatha awaited him as the donor of the bride. He emphasized that in weddings, rituals become valid only when benefactor (Janaka) and beneficiary (Dasharatha) unite in purpose. Janaka replied that all preparations were complete and that his daughters, radiant and joyful, were already present near the sacred fire. This mutual readiness symbolizes trust and balance between giving and receiving.

Janaka added that his duties were fulfilled and that Dasharatha might now proceed without delay. Dasharatha sent his sons one by one into the hall with the sages. Janaka then requested Vasishta to conduct the ceremonies, honoring Rama as one celebrated across the universe. With Vishvamitra and Shatananda assisting, Vasishta commenced the sacred rites.
The seamless coordination reflects how great outcomes arise from shared responsibility.

Vasishta prepared the altar of fire at the center point of the wedding hall, adorning it with sandal paste and flowers. Vessels were filled with puffed rice and turmeric-infused grains. Sacred grass was arranged by Vasishta, in harmony with Vedic chants, and the ritual fire was kindled, followed by the Homam. Fire here stands as a universal witness, an ancient yet ever-relevant, to vows and truth.

Janaka then led forth Sita, adorned in exquisite bridal ornaments, and placed her before Rama near the sacred fire. Addressing Rama, he declared: ‘O ‘Kausalya Kumara! (son of Kausalya!) This is Sita, my daughter, your lifelong partner in duty. Sita is the symbol of moral truth and morality tolerant womanhood. She will walk with you in every righteous path you choose. Accept her hand and take her from her father. May all auspiciousness be yours.’ He poured sacred water into Rama’s hands amidst chanting of hymns, as flowers rained from the heavens. This moment captures marriage as companionship in purpose, not mere ritual.

Janaka similarly gave Urmila to Lakshmana, Mandavi to Bharata, and Shrutakirti to Shatrughna. The four princes accepted their brides’ (all the four daughters of Janaka and his brother Kushadhvaja) hands and circumambulated the sacred fire, sages, and elders, affirming their vows. The collective ceremony reinforces equality, unity, and shared destiny among siblings.

Thus, under Vasishta’s guidance, the weddings were concluded, consistent with the customs and traditions as directed by sage Vasishta amid divine music, celestial showers of flowers, and joyous celebrations by Gandharvas and Apsarasas. The couples completed the final circumambulations and retired to their palaces, followed by elders and sages. Joy here is portrayed as sacred, dignified, and inclusive.

During the wedding, Janaka declared, ‘Kausalya Kumara (O son of Kausalya), this Sita is my daughter. She is your Saha Dharma Charini (Partner in Dharma). Take her hand in marriage. You will gain worldwide fame and auspiciousness. Hold her hand with sacred mantras.’ Janaka poured sacred water into Rama’s hands. The phrase ‘Iyam Sita’ (This Sita) signifies reverence and pride. The phrase subtly teaches respect for womanhood, modesty, and dignity. Out of modesty, Sita does not step forward, prompting Janaka to say ‘This Sita’ while handing her over to Rama. Though born of the earth, Janaka considers Sita as his own daughter (Mama Suta).

Janaka’s addressing Rama as ‘Kausalya Kumara’ removes all ambiguity. It defines Rama through his moral lineage rather than mere royal identity. Even today, identity rooted in values outweighs labels of power or position. By saying ‘This Sita,’ Janaka protects Sita’s modesty and Rama’s dignity, ensuring no misinterpretation of intent. The episode highlights the importance of sensitivity and social perception in human interactions. Mirrors in the wedding hall reflected Sita everywhere, symbolizing her unparalleled beauty and presence. Janaka’s guidance ensured Rama’s focus on the true Sita. This reminds modern readers to seek substance beyond appearances.

Sita, though discovered in a furrow, represents noble effort bearing fruit, just as cultivation yields harvest. Janaka implies that Rama’s endeavors will succeed through Sita’s unwavering support. Partnership remains the cornerstone of achievement. Sita is likened to the celestial Ganga, capable of purifying those who seek her grace. Janaka asserts her equality with Rama in nobility and spiritual stature. True partnership knows no hierarchy.

Calling Sita ‘Saha Dharma Charini’ assures that she will share Rama’s dharma in all circumstances. As Lakshmi to Vishnu, she accompanies him in creation, preservation, and dissolution. The marriage, thus, is a divine play enacted for the world’s guidance.
In essence, the union teaches that shared values, mutual respect, and collective responsibility form the heart of enduring relationships.

The celestial wedding of Sita and Rama was not merely an event of the past, bit was a living narrative that continues to speak to contemporary society. It reminds modern readers, whether in India or across the globe, that, marriage is a sacred partnership grounded in dharma, equality, and mutual growth. By revisiting this episode through accessible English retelling enriched with traditional insight, one can reconnect timeless wisdom with present-day lives, ensuring that the Ramayana remains a guiding light for generations to come.


Tradition, Memory, and Measure

A Message on Living Tradition and Sacred Continuity

The wedding of Sita and Rama, as envisioned in the Valmiki Ramayana, is not merely an episode within an epic, but a measure by which sacred order is understood and preserved. In this vision, word, rite, lineage, and intent move in harmonious proportion, revealing that dharma is sustained not by novelty or display, but by remembrance rightly preserved and consciously transmitted. What is remembered with care endures, and what is altered without measure fades.

Rituals born of the Ramayana are acts of recollection rather than reenactment. They do not seek to recreate the past as spectacle, but to reawaken it as lived meaning. Their strength lies in restraint, where clarity prevails over excess, where sequence matters, and where silence often conveys as much truth as speech. Such rituals teach by alignment, not assertion.

Marriage, in this sacred vision, is ‘Saha Dharma,’ a shared journey of responsibility, not merely a shared identity or title. Janaka’s offering of Sita as Saha Dharma Charini affirms companionship rooted in duty, equality refined by grace, and endurance shaped by purpose. This conception neither diminishes individuality nor elevates hierarchy, instead, it binds two lives in moral symmetry. Such a principle remains untouched by time.

Tradition lives when it listens attentively to its source. The Valmiki Ramayana itself allows poetic freedom, symbolic depth, and narrative beauty, yet it never loosens its moral or ritual spine. Imagination there is disciplined, never unmoored from intent. Continuity, therefore, is not achieved by repetition alone, but by fidelity to essence, by knowing what may be adapted and what must remain inviolate.

When sages like Vasishta and Shatananda, with deliberate clarity and sacred authority, recounted the lineages of Dasharatha and Janaka, they were doing more than narrating genealogy. They were situating the rite within cosmic order, social structure, and moral inheritance. Custom and tradition, shaped by such precision, therefore ask for nothing excessive, but only adherence to the Adi Kavya, the Valmiki Ramayana, from which their legitimacy flows.

Deviation, when it refines understanding, clarifies symbolism, or deepens devotion, may find its own natural acceptance over time. Growth that illuminates is not foreign to tradition. Yet when departures cloud meaning, disturb coherence, or weaken the narrative spine, they invite discernment. Correction, in such cases, need not arise from contention, but time itself, guided by scholarship and collective conscience, has a quiet way of restoring alignment.

Sacred narration is not an arena for display, nor is ritual an occasion for intellectual triumph. Scholarship here is service, and eloquence finds its highest form in simplicity. The sages taught by illumination rather than insistence, by example rather than excess, allowing truth to settle gently and enduringly in the listener’s heart.

Bhadrachalam, revered by generations as a southern echo of Ayodhya, reminds that living tradition thrives when memory, measure, and reverence remain aligned. When essence is preserved and expression remains true to source, the Valmiki Ramayana continues to speak, not loudly, not insistently, but lastingly, across centuries, cultures, and peoples, as a steady guide to balance and dharma.

Bhadrachalam, cherished by devotees as a spiritual extension of Ayodhya, occupies a unique place in this living continuum. Its legacy reminds that devotion flourishes best when memory, ritual, and reverence move in harmony. Preserving such harmony does not require confrontation, but reflection, and not accusation, but alignment with sources that have withstood time.

{{From my Published Book ‘Simplified and Faithful Rendering of the Adi Kavya’

Valmiki Ramayana: The Greatest Epic (Bala and Ayodhya Kandas)}}

(This Book is free of cost for all those who are interested to read the English Version of Valmiki Ramayana, provided they collect it from me in person preferably. Mobile: 8008137012)

>>>>>> Photos Courtesy Rama Bhakta Vijaya Raghava Dasu

Sunday, June 7, 2026

LEARN FROM THE SUAVE DIPLOMACY TACT EXEMPLIFIED BY LORD KRISHNA : Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao

 LEARN FROM THE SUAVE DIPLOMACY TACT

EXEMPLIFIED BY LORD KRISHNA

Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao

Hans India (June 7, 2026)

{Through reasoned persuasion, Krishna demonstrated that enduring peace emerges not from domination but from equitable governance and respect for legitimate rights, beyond power and privilege. Krishna said that when truth and righteousness are repeatedly ignored, conflict becomes increasingly difficult to prevent. His appeal reflected a diplomatic principle that remains relevant today: peace is sustained not merely by goodwill but by the timely resolution of grievances} – Editor’s Synoptic Note

Just prior to the Mahabharata battle at Kurukshetra, when peace and destruction were delicately balanced, Krishna undertook what may be regarded as the most profound diplomatic mission recorded in ancient literature. The impending conflict drew together kingdoms and people from vast regions, prompting many scholars to view it conceptually as an ‘Early world-scale war.’

Krishna's mission was not merely an attempt to avert bloodshed. It was a supreme exercise in statesmanship, moral courage, and commitment to reconciliation. Arriving in the Kaurava Court as a peace envoy, Sri Krishna displayed exemplary diplomatic conduct.

He neither asserted authority nor sought privilege, but conducted himself with dignity, restraint, and respect toward all present. His presence transformed the atmosphere of the royal assembly into one of reflection and solemnity. In every aspect, he embodied the ideal diplomat, firm in principles, impartial in approach, and unwavering in commitment to peace. Addressing the Blind King Dhritarashtra, Krishna emphasized that the welfare of both Kauravas and Pandavas rested upon justice, mutual respect, and harmonious coexistence. He reminded the king that leadership carried obligations to preserve unity, fairness, and stability.

Through reasoned persuasion, Krishna demonstrated that enduring peace emerges not from domination but from equitable governance and respect for legitimate rights, beyond power and privilege. Krishna further reminded the assembly that the Bharata Dynasty earned lasting glory through adherence to dharma, truth, compassion, and sacrifice. Throughout its history, personal ambitions were subordinated to collective welfare. Never before had the dynasty contemplated self-destruction for the sake of political power. He questioned why a lineage celebrated for wisdom and restraint should now abandon its noblest traditions and principles.

The peace envoy warned that unchecked ambition and attachment were gradually corroding the ethical foundations of governance. He appealed to Dhritarashtra to rise above familial weakness and act as guardian of justice. His message carried a universal truth, that societies seldom decline because of external threats alone. Instead, they weaken when those entrusted with responsibility fail to act with courage, fairness, and foresight.

Speaking on behalf of the Pandavas, Krishna indicated that opportunities for reconciliation still existed. Yet he also cautioned that indifference toward injustice eventually harms both victims and bystanders.

Krishna said that, when truth and righteousness are repeatedly ignored, conflict becomes increasingly difficult to prevent. His appeal reflected a diplomatic principle that remains relevant today: peace is sustained not merely by goodwill but by the timely resolution of grievances. The great sages present in the court supported Krishna's counsel and urged reconciliation. Their collective wisdom highlighted the grave consequences of allowing pride to overpower reason. Yet despite these appeals, Dhritarashtra remained silent, unable to influence events decisively. Silence in the face of mounting injustice often contributes to the very tragedies it seeks to avoid.

Duryodhana, however, remained unyielding. Rejecting every proposal for compromise, he insisted that no portion of the kingdom would be shared with the Pandavas. His determination reflected absolute confidence in his strength. Yet diplomacy teaches that genuine strength lies not merely in the capacity to fight but in the wisdom to prevent avoidable conflict. He was unaware that, refusal to compromise transforms manageable disputes into irreversible confrontations. Recognizing the futility of further persuasion, Krishna declared that war had become increasingly inevitable.

The sincere counsel of Gandhari also failed to soften Duryodhana's position. This illustrates a timeless lesson: arrogance frequently is mistaken as determination for courage, while history repeatedly reveals that inflexibility can become the architect of destruction. When an attempt was made to detain Krishna, he responded not with anger but with serene confidence. The celebrated revelation of the ‘Cosmic Vishwaroopa (Magnificent Universal Form),’ symbolized the immeasurable power of truth and moral authority. The incident conveyed a profound message that wisdom, justice, and higher principles cannot be confined by force.

Before departing, Krishna made one final effort to prevent war by meeting Karna the ‘Comrade in Arms of Duryodhana’ privately. Revealing the circumstances of Karna's birth, he invited him to join the Pandavas and assume his rightful position. It was a remarkable diplomatic initiative aimed at exploring every remaining avenue for peace.

Even when prospects appear remote, responsible diplomacy seeks solutions until all possibilities have been exhausted. Karna's response was equally remarkable. Though deeply moved by Krishna's revelation, he chose loyalty to those who had nurtured and supported him throughout his life.

Karna’s decision reflected gratitude, personal honour, and commitment to longstanding relationships. The exchange between Krishna and Karna remains one of the most moving illustrations of the complex interplay between duty, loyalty, identity, and moral choice. Returning from Hastinapura, Krishna informed Pandavas that every proposal for peace was rejected. With reconciliation no longer possible, preparations for war commenced on both sides.

Leaders and commanders were appointed, strategies formulated, and alliances consolidated. Yet even amid military preparations, the significance of Krishna's mission remained undiminished.

The attempt to prevent war became morally as important as the conduct of war itself. The events preceding Kurukshetra War demonstrate that responsible leadership demands exhaustive efforts toward peaceful settlement before resorting to confrontation. Diplomacy does not guarantee success, but its failure after sincere endeavour provides moral legitimacy to subsequent action. Krishna's mission therefore stands both as a historical episode and as a timeless benchmark of ethical statecraft.

In the contemporary world, humanity continues to confront tensions arising from competing interests, mistrust, and the pursuit of power. International institutions, regional forums, and national governments repeatedly encounter challenges that require wisdom rather than confrontation. The world therefore needs diplomats who combine intellectual depth with moral conviction, individuals capable of building bridges where divisions appear insurmountable. The enduring relevance of Krishna's mission lies in its demonstration that diplomacy is not a peripheral activity but civilization's first line of defence against catastrophe.

Before armies march, dialogue must speak. Before conflicts escalate, reconciliation must be attempted. Before humanity accepts destruction as inevitable, voices of wisdom must be heard. In the twenty-first century, humanity possesses unprecedented scientific advancement, yet remains vulnerable to conflicts born of mistrust, competing interests, and failures of communication. The world therefore requires diplomats who embody the qualities demonstrated by Sri Krishna during his peace mission: integrity, neutrality, wisdom, courage, patience, and unwavering commitment to reconciliation.

International institutions, particularly the United Nations, would greatly benefit from cultivating and deploying teams of highly professional diplomats whose allegiance transcends narrow considerations and remains firmly anchored in the larger welfare of humanity. For such individuals, the world itself becomes their sphere of responsibility and peace their highest mission. Their success must be measured not merely by treaties negotiated, but by conflicts prevented and human suffering averted.

Another remarkable lesson emerging from the Mahabharata is the importance of truthful war reporting. Sage Vedavyasa entrusted Sanjaya with the responsibility of narrating the events of Kurukshetra faithfully and without distortion to Dhritarashtra. In a conceptual sense, this may be viewed as one of the earliest examples of systematic war reporting in literature. The principle remains profoundly relevant today.

During periods of conflict, accurate, impartial, and responsible reporting becomes essential for preserving truth, informing humanity, and preventing misinformation from deepening divisions.  Just as ethical diplomacy seeks peace before conflict, ethical reporting safeguards truth during conflict, enabling future generations to learn from history rather than repeat its tragedies.

The legacy of Sri Krishna's peace mission ultimately transcends time, geography, and politics. It reminds that the greatness of civilizations is measured not by the wars they wage but by the conflicts they prevent. In an age that urgently seeks peace, the world needs diplomats with the integrity, courage, vision, and humanity exemplified by Krishna, individuals who place the welfare of humanity above pride, power, and prejudice. Such diplomacy remains one of the noblest pathways toward lasting world peace.

>>> The Telugu version of this is published in Prajatantra daily and available in this blog >>>

Saturday, June 6, 2026

అన్ని కాలాల‌కు వ‌ర్తించే శ్రీ‌కృష్ణుని దౌత్య‌నీతి! >>>>> వనం జ్వాలా నరసింహారావు

 అన్ని కాలాల‌కు వ‌ర్తించే శ్రీ‌కృష్ణుని దౌత్య‌నీతి!

వనం జ్వాలా నరసింహారావు

ప్రజాతంత్ర దినపత్రిక (జూన్ నెల 7, 2026)

         {{సైన్యాలు కవాతు చేసే ముందు, సంభాషణ జరగాలి. సంఘర్షణలు తీవ్రమయ్యే ముందు, రాజీకి ప్రయత్నించాలి. వినాశనం అనివార్యమని మానవాళి అంగీకరించే ముందు, వివేక స్వరాలు వినిపించాలి. ఇరవై ఒకటవ శతాబ్దంలో, మానవాళి అపూర్వమైన శాస్త్రీయ పురోగతిని సాధించినప్పటికీ, అపనమ్మకం, పరస్పర విరుద్ధ ప్రయోజనాలు,  భావప్రసార వైఫల్యాల వల్ల పుట్టిన సంఘర్షణలకు గురవుతూనే ఉంది. అందువల్ల, శ్రీకృష్ణుడు తన శాంతి యాత్రలో ప్రదర్శించిన సమగ్రత, తటస్థత, వివేకం, ధైర్యం, సహనం,  రాజీ పట్ల అచంచలమైన నిబద్ధత వంటి గుణాలను మూర్తీభవించిన దౌత్యవేత్తలు ప్రపంచానికి అవసరం.

          శ్రీకృష్ణుని శాంతి యాత్ర వారసత్వం చివరికి కాలం, భౌగోళికం, రాజకీయాలకు అతీతమైనది. నాగరికతల గొప్పతనం అవి చేసే యుద్ధాల ద్వారా కాకుండా, అవి నివారించే సంఘర్షణల ద్వారా కొలవబడుతుందని ఇది గుర్తు చేస్తుంది. శాంతిని అత్యవసరంగా ఆకాంక్షిస్తున్న ఈ యుగంలో, అహంకారం, అధికారం, పక్షపాతం కన్నా మానవాళి సంక్షేమానికి ప్రాధాన్యతనిచ్చే, కృష్ణుడు ప్రదర్శించినటువంటి నిజాయితీ, ధైర్యం, దూరదృష్టి, మానవత్వం గల దౌత్యవేత్తలు ప్రపంచానికి అవసరం. అటువంటి దౌత్యం శాశ్వత ప్రపంచ శాంతికి దారితీసే అత్యంత శ్రేష్ఠమైన మార్గాలలో ఒకటిగా నిలుస్తుంది.}} – ప్రజాతంత్ర సంపాదకుడి క్లుప్త వ్యాఖ్య.

          కురుక్షేత్రంలో జరిగిన మహాభారత యుద్ధానికి ముందు రోజు, శాంతి, వినాశనం మధ్య పెను ప్రమాదం పొంచి ఉన్న వేళ, శ్రీకృష్ణుడు ప్రాచీన సాహిత్యంలో నమోదైన అత్యంత గొప్ప‌ దౌత్య యాత్రగా పరిగణించబడే ఒక కార్యాన్ని చేపట్టాడు. జ‌ర‌గ‌బోయే ఈ సంఘర్షణ సువిశాల ప్రాంతాలకు చెందిన రాజ్యాలను, ప్రజలను ఏకతాటిపైకి తెచ్చింది. దీనితో చాలామంది పండితులు దీన్ని ఒక ‘తొలి ప్రపంచ స్థాయి యుద్ధం’గా భావించారు. కృష్ణుని కార్యచరణ కేవలం రక్తపాతాన్ని నివారించే ప్రయత్నం మాత్రమే కాదు. అది రాజనీతిజ్ఞత, నైతిక ధైర్యం మాత్ర‌మే కాదు. సయోధ్య పట్ల నిబద్ధతకు ఒక అత్యున్నత నిదర్శనం. శాంతికోసం రాయబారిగా కౌరవ సభకు వచ్చిన శ్రీకృష్ణుడు ఆదర్శప్రాయమైన దౌత్య వ్య‌వ‌హార‌శైలిని ప్రదర్శించాడు.

ఆయన అధికారాన్ని ప్రదర్శించలేదు. ప్రత్యేక హక్కులను కోరలేదు. కానీ, అక్కడ ఉన్నవారందరి పట్ల గౌరవంతో, సంయమనంతో, మర్యాదతో ప్రవర్తించాడు. ఆయన రాకతో రాజసభ వాతావరణం సాలోచ‌న‌గా, గంభీరంగా మారిపోయింది. ప్రతి విషయంలోనూ, ఆయన ఆదర్శ దౌత్యవేత్తగా నిలిచారు;  దృఢ‌మైన సిద్ధాంతంతో,  విధానంలో నిష్పక్షపాతంగా, శాంతి పట్ల నిబద్ధతతో అచంచలంగా ఉండేవారు. అంధరాజు ధృతరాష్ట్రుడిని ఉద్దేశించి కృష్ణుడు మాట్లాడుతూ, కౌరవ పాండవుల ఇద్దరి శ్రేయస్సు న్యాయం, పరస్పర గౌరవం, సామరస్య సహజీవనంపై ఆధారపడి ఉంటుందని నొక్కి చెప్పారు. ఐక్యత, న్యాయం, స్థిరత్వాన్ని కాపాడాల్సిన బాధ్యత నాయకత్వానికి ఉంటుందని ఆయన రాజుకు గుర్తు చేశారు.

స‌హేతుక‌మైన రీతిలో ఒప్పించ‌డం ద్వారా, శాశ్వత శాంతి ఆధిపత్యం వల్ల కాకుండా, అధికారం, విశేషాధికారాలకు అతీతంగా, స‌మ‌పాల‌న‌, చట్టబద్ధమైన హక్కుల పట్ల గౌరవం నుండే ఉద్భవిస్తుందని కృష్ణుడు నిరూపించాడు. ధర్మం, సత్యం, కరుణ, త్యాగానికి కట్టుబడి ఉండటం ద్వారానే భరతవంశం శాశ్వత కీర్తిని సంపాదించిందని కృష్ణుడు సభకు గుర్తు చేశాడు. దాని యావ‌త్తు చ‌రిత్ర‌, వ్యక్తిగత ఆశయాలు, సామూహిక సంక్షేమానికి లోబడి వున్న‌ది. రాజకీయ అధికారం కోసం ఆ వంశం ఇంతకు ముందెన్నడూ ఆత్మవినాశనం గురించి ఆలోచించలేదు. జ్ఞానం, సంయమనానికి ప్రసిద్ధి చెందిన ఒక వంశం ఇప్పుడు తన అత్యున్నత సంప్రదాయాలను, సూత్రాలను ఎందుకు విడిచిపెట్టాలని ఆయన ప్రశ్నించాడు.

మితిమీరిన దురాశ‌,  మమకారం పరిపాలన  నైతిక పునాదులను క్రమంగా క్షీణింపజేస్తున్నాయని ఆ శాంతి రాయబారి హెచ్చరించాడు. కుటుంబ బలహీనతలకు అతీతంగా ఎదిగి, న్యాయ సంరక్షకుడిగా వ్యవహరించాలని ఆయన ధృతరాష్ట్రుడికి విజ్ఞప్తి చేశాడు. కేవలం బాహ్య ముప్పుల వల్ల సమాజాలు అరుదుగా క్షీణిస్తాయనే సార్వత్రిక సత్యాన్ని ఆయన సందేశం తెలియజేసింది. దానికి బదులుగా, బాధ్యత అప్పగించబడిన వారు ధైర్యం, న్యాయం, ముందుచూపుతో వ్యవహరించడంలో విఫలమైనప్పుడు అవి బలహీనపడతాయి. పాండవుల తరపున మాట్లాడుతూ, రాజీకి అవకాశాలు ఇంకా ఉన్నాయని కృష్ణుడు సూచించాడు. అయినప్పటికీ, అన్యాయం పట్ల ఉదాసీనత చివరికి బాధితులను చూస్తూ ఊరుకునేవారికి కూడా హాని చేస్తుందని ఆయన హెచ్చరించాడు.

సత్యాన్ని, ధర్మాన్ని పదేపదే విస్మరించినప్పుడు, సంఘర్షణను నివారించడం మరింత కష్టమవుతుందని కృష్ణుడు చెప్పాడు. ఆయన చేసిన విజ్ఞప్తి, నేటికీ ప్రాసంగికంగా ఉన్న ఒక దౌత్య సూత్రాన్ని ప్రతిబింబించింది: శాంతి కేవలం సద్భావనతోనే కాకుండా, మనోవేదనలను సకాలంలో పరిష్కరించడం ద్వారా కూడా నిలుస్తుంది. సభలో ఉన్న మహర్షులు కృష్ణుని సలహాను సమర్థించి, రాజీపడమని కోరారు. అహంకారం వివేకాన్ని అధిగమించడం వల్ల కలిగే తీవ్ర పరిణామాలను వారి సమ‌ష్టి జ్ఞానం స్పష్టం చేసింది. అయినప్పటికీ, ఈ విజ్ఞప్తులు చేసినా, ధృతరాష్ట్రుడు సంఘటనలను నిర్ణయాత్మకంగా ప్రభావితం చేయలేక మౌనంగా ఉండిపోయాడు. పెరిగిపోతున్న అన్యాయం ఎదుట మౌనం వహించడం, త‌ర‌చుగా విషాదాలకే దారితీస్తుంది.

అయితే, దుర్యోధనుడు మాత్రం లొంగలేదు. రాజీ కోసం చేసిన ప్రతి ప్రతిపాదనను తిరస్కరిస్తూ, రాజ్యంలో ఏ భాగాన్నీ పాండవులతో పంచుకోబోమని పట్టుబట్టాడు. ఆయన దృఢ సంకల్పం తన బలంపై ఉన్న సంపూర్ణ విశ్వాసాన్ని ప్రతిబింబించింది. అయినప్పటికీ, నిజమైన బలం కేవలం పోరాడే సామర్థ్యంలోనే కాకుండా, సంఘర్షణను నివారించే వివేకంలోనూ ఉంటుందని దౌత్యం బోధిస్తుంది. రాజీకి నిరాకరించడం, పరిష్కరించగల వివాదాలను కోలుకోలేని ఘర్షణలుగా మారుస్తుందనే విషయం అతనికి తెలియదు. ఇకపై నచ్చజెప్పడం వ్యర్థమని గ్రహించిన కృష్ణుడు, యుద్ధం అనివార్యమైందని ప్రకటించాడు.

గాంధారి  నిష్కపటమైన సలహా కూడా దుర్యోధనుడి వైఖరిని మెత్తబరచ‌లేక‌పోయింది.  ఇది ఒక శాశ్వతమైన పాఠాన్ని తెలియజేస్తుంది: అహంకారాన్ని తరచుగా ధైర్యంగా పొరపాటుగా భావిస్తారు, అయితే మొండితనం వినాశనానికి దారితీస్తుందని చరిత్ర పదేపదే వెల్లడిస్తుంది. కృష్ణుడిని నిర్బంధించడానికి ప్రయత్నం జరిగినప్పుడు, ఆయన కోపంతో కాకుండా ప్రశాంతమైన విశ్వాసంతో స్పందించారు. ప్రసిద్ధమైన ‘విశ్వరూపం’  ఆవిష్కరణ, సత్యం, నైతిక అధికారం యొక్క కొలవలేని శక్తికి ప్రతీకగా నిలిచింది. జ్ఞానం, న్యాయం, ఉన్నత సూత్రాలను బలంతో బంధించలేమనే లోతైన సందేశాన్ని ఈ సంఘటన స్ప‌ష్టం చేసింది.

బయలుదేరే ముందు, కృష్ణుడు ‘దుర్యోధనుడి సహచరుడు’ అయిన కర్ణుడిని ఏకాంతంగా కలవడం ద్వారా యుద్ధాన్ని నివారించడానికి చివరి ప్రయత్నం చేశారు. కర్ణుడి పుట్టుక పరిస్థితులను వెల్లడించి, పాండవులతో చేరి తన న్యాయమైన స్థానాన్ని స్వీకరించమని అతన్ని ఆహ్వానించారు. శాంతి కోసం మిగిలి ఉన్న ప్రతి మార్గాన్ని అన్వేషించే లక్ష్యంతో ఇది ఒక అద్భుతమైన దౌత్యపరమైన చొరవ. అవకాశాలు దూరంగా ఉన్నట్లు కనిపించినప్పటికీ, బాధ్యతాయుతమైన దౌత్యం అన్ని మార్గాలు మూసుకుపోయే వరకు పరిష్కారాలను అన్వేషిస్తుంది. కర్ణుని ప్రతిస్పందన కూడా అంతే విశేషమైనది. కృష్ణుని ప్రకటనతో ఎంతగానో చలించిపోయినప్పటికీ, తన జీవితాంతం తనను పెంచి, ఆదుకున్న వారి పట్ల విధేయతను ఎంచుకున్నాడు.

కర్ణుని నిర్ణయం కృతజ్ఞతను, వ్యక్తిగత గౌరవాన్ని,  చిరకాల సంబంధాల పట్ల నిబద్ధతను ప్రతిబింబించింది. కృష్ణుడు, కర్ణుని మధ్య జరిగిన సంభాషణ, కర్తవ్యం, విశ్వాసం, గుర్తింపు, నైతికతల మ‌ధ్య వుండే సంక్లిష్ట‌మైన ప‌ర‌స్ప‌ర క్రియాశీల‌త‌ను హృద‌యానికి హ‌త్తుకునే రీతిలో వెల్ల‌డించే ఉదాహ‌ర‌ణ‌ల్లో ఒక‌టిగా నిలిచిపోయింది. హస్తినాపురం నుండి తిరిగి వచ్చిన కృష్ణుడు, శాంతి కోసం చేసిన ప్రతి ప్రతిపాదన తిరస్కర‌ణ‌కు గురైంద‌ని పాండవులకు తెలియజేశాడు. రాజీ కుదరకపోవడంతో, ఇరుపక్షాలూ యుద్ధానికి సన్నాహాలు ప్రారంభించాయి. నాయకులు, సేనాధిపతులు నియమించబడ్డారు, వ్యూహాలు రూపొందించబడ్డాయి, పొత్తులు పటిష్టం చేయబడ్డాయి. అయినప్పటికీ, ఈ సైనిక సన్నాహాల మధ్య కూడా, కృష్ణుని కర్తవ్యం  ప్రాముఖ్యత ఏమాత్రం తగ్గలేదు.

యుద్ధాన్ని నివారించే ప్రయత్నం, యుద్ధం చేయడంతో సమానమైన నైతిక ప్రాముఖ్యతను సంతరించుకుంది. కురుక్షేత్ర యుద్ధానికి ముందు జరిగిన సంఘటనలు, బాధ్యతాయుతమైన నాయకత్వం ఘర్షణకు దిగడానికి ముందు శాంతియుత పరిష్కారం కోసం విస్తృతమైన ప్రయత్నాలు చేయాలని స్పష్టం చేస్తాయి. దౌత్యం విజయానికి హామీ ఇవ్వదు, కానీ చిత్తశుద్ధితో చేసిన ప్రయత్నం విఫలమైనప్పుడు, అది తదుపరి చర్యకు నైతిక చట్టబద్ధతను కల్పిస్తుంది. అందువల్ల కృష్ణుని కర్తవ్యం ఒక చారిత్రక ఘట్టంగానూ, నైతిక రాజనీతికి ఒక శాశ్వతమైన కొలమానంగానూ నిలుస్తుంది.

సమకాలీన ప్రపంచంలో, పరస్పర విరుద్ధ ప్రయోజనాలు, అపనమ్మకం, అధికార దాహం వల్ల తలెత్తే ఉద్రిక్తతలను మానవాళి నిరంతరం ఎదుర్కొంటోంది. అంతర్జాతీయ సంస్థలు, ప్రాంతీయ వేదికలు, జాతీయ ప్రభుత్వాలు ఘర్షణకు బదులుగా వివేకం అవసరమయ్యే సవాళ్లను పదేపదే ఎదుర్కొంటున్నాయి. అందువల్ల, అద్వితీయ మేధ‌స్సును నైతిక విశ్వాసంతో మేళవించిన దౌత్యవేత్తలు, అసాధ్యమైన విభేదాలు కనిపించేచోట వారధులు నిర్మించగల వ్యక్తులు ప్రపంచానికి అవసరం. దౌత్యం అనేది ఒక అప్రధానమైన చర్య కాదని, అది విపత్తు నుండి నాగరికతను కాపాడే మొదటి రక్షణ కవచం అని కృష్ణుని మిషన్ నిరూపించడంలోనే దాని శాశ్వత ప్రాసంగికత ఉంది.

సైన్యాలు కవాతు చేసే ముందు, సంభాషణ జరగాలి. సంఘర్షణలు తీవ్రమయ్యే ముందు, రాజీకి ప్రయత్నించాలి. వినాశనం అనివార్యమని మానవాళి అంగీకరించే ముందు, వివేక స్వరాలు వినిపించాలి. ఇరవై ఒకటవ శతాబ్దంలో, మానవాళి అపూర్వమైన శాస్త్రీయ పురోగతిని సాధించినప్పటికీ, అపనమ్మకం, పరస్పర విరుద్ధ ప్రయోజనాలు,  భావప్రసార వైఫల్యాల వల్ల పుట్టిన సంఘర్షణలకు గురవుతూనే ఉంది. అందువల్ల, శ్రీకృష్ణుడు తన శాంతి యాత్రలో ప్రదర్శించిన సమగ్రత, తటస్థత, వివేకం, ధైర్యం, సహనం,  రాజీ పట్ల అచంచలమైన నిబద్ధత వంటి గుణాలను మూర్తీభవించిన దౌత్యవేత్తలు ప్రపంచానికి అవసరం.

అంతర్జాతీయ సంస్థలు, ముఖ్యంగా ఐక్యరాజ్యసమితి, సంకుచితమైన వాటికి  అతీతంగా మానవాళి విస్తృత సంక్షేమానికి కట్టుబడి ఉండే అత్యంత వృత్తిపరమైన దౌత్యవేత్తల బృందాలను పెంచి, నియమించడం ద్వారా ఎంతగానో ప్రయోజనం పొందుతాయి. అటువంటి వ్యక్తులకు, ప్రపంచమే బాధ్యతా క్షేత్రం అవుతుంది.  శాంతి వారి అత్యున్నత కర్తవ్యం అవుతుంది. వారి విజయాన్ని కేవలం చర్చల ద్వారా కుదిరిన ఒప్పందాలతోనే కాకుండా, నివారించిన సంఘర్షణలు,  మాన‌వుల‌ను బాధ‌ల‌నుంచి విముక్తి క‌లిగించిన సంద‌ర్భాల ద్వారా కూడా కొలవాలి.

మహాభారతం నుండి వెలువడే మరో విశేషమైన పాఠం, సత్యసంధమైన యుద్ధ నివేదన  ప్రాముఖ్యత. కురుక్షేత్ర యుద్ధ సంఘటనలను ధృతరాష్ట్రునికి యథాతథంగా, వక్రీకరణ లేకుండా విశ్వసనీయంగా వివరించే బాధ్యతను వేదవ్యాస మహర్షి సంజయుడికి అప్పగించారు. భావనాత్మకంగా, దీనిని సాహిత్యంలో ఒక క్ర‌మ పద్ధ‌తితో యుద్ధాన్ని గురించి వివ‌రించిన  తొలి ఉదాహరణలలో ఒకటిగా చూడవచ్చు. ఈ సూత్రం నేటికీ అత్యంత ప్రాసంగికంగా ఉంది. సంఘర్షణ సమయాల్లో, సత్యాన్ని పరిరక్షించడానికి, మానవాళికి సమాచారం అందించడానికి, తప్పుడు సమాచారం విభేదాలను మరింత పెంచకుండా నిరోధించడానికి కచ్చితమైన, నిష్పక్షపాతమైన, బాధ్యతాయుతమైన నివేదన అత్యవసరం అవుతుంది.

నైతిక దౌత్యం సంఘర్షణకు ముందు శాంతిని కోరుకున్నట్లే, నైతిక నివేదన సంఘర్షణ సమయంలో సత్యాన్ని కాపాడుతుంది. తద్వారా భవిష్యత్ తరాలు చరిత్ర విషాదాలను పునరావృతం చేయకుండా, దాని నుండి పాఠాలు నేర్చుకునేలా చేస్తుంది. శ్రీకృష్ణుని శాంతి యాత్ర వారసత్వం చివరికి కాలం, భౌగోళికం, రాజకీయాలకు అతీతమైనది. నాగరికతల గొప్పతనం అవి చేసే యుద్ధాల ద్వారా కాకుండా, అవి నివారించే సంఘర్షణల ద్వారా కొలవబడుతుందని ఇది గుర్తు చేస్తుంది.

శాంతిని అత్యవసరంగా ఆకాంక్షిస్తున్న ఈ యుగంలో, అహంకారం, అధికారం, పక్షపాతం కన్నా మానవాళి సంక్షేమానికి ప్రాధాన్యతనిచ్చే, కృష్ణుడు ప్రదర్శించినటువంటి నిజాయితీ, ధైర్యం, దూరదృష్టి, మానవత్వం గల దౌత్యవేత్తలు ప్రపంచానికి అవసరం. అటువంటి దౌత్యం శాశ్వత ప్రపంచ శాంతికి దారితీసే అత్యంత శ్రేష్ఠమైన మార్గాలలో ఒకటిగా నిలుస్తుంది.

(నా ఆంగ్ల వ్యాసానికి ప్రజాతంత్ర పత్రిక స్వేచ్చానువాదం. సంపాదకుడికి ధన్యవాదాలు)

>>>The English original of this article is published in Hans India on June 7, 2026 and available in this blog also >>>

Public Service, Leadership, and Legacy >>>>> The Seventeenth Friday Evening at Press Club Hyderabad With Dr PV Ramesh and Dr J Purnachandra Rao : By Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao

 Public Service, Leadership, and Legacy

The Seventeenth Friday Evening 

at Press Club Hyderabad
With Dr PV Ramesh and Dr J Purnachandra Rao

Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao 

(June 5, 2026)

The Seventeenth Friday Evening Gathering at the Press Club Hyderabad marked another significant milestone in this evolving journey of conversations, reflections, and shared learning. If earlier meetings drew largely from journalism, public affairs, social movements, and institutional memory, this evening expanded the canvas further through the presence of two distinguished former civil servants whose careers have left a lasting imprint on public administration and public life: former IAS officer Dr PV Ramesh and former IPS officer Dr J Purnachandra Rao.

Joining them were former CEO of HMRI (Health Management and Research Institute) Dr U Balaji and entrepreneur Jogesh, each adding a distinct perspective to the discussions that unfolded through the evening. The gathering was further enriched by the first-time participation of senior journalists S Nagesh Kumar and Srinivas U, whose observations and contributions blended seamlessly into the free-flowing exchange of ideas that has become the hallmark of these meetings.

Also present were Amar Devulapalli, Bhandaru Srinivasa Rao, VJM Divakar, Mallepally Lakshmaiah, Lalita Iyer, Attaluri Aruna, Uma, A Saye Sekhar, and myself. With a rich mix of experience drawn from journalism, governance, public policy, healthcare, entrepreneurship, and social engagement, the evening promised not merely conversation, but a meaningful exploration of ideas shaped by decades of lived experience.

Despite the occasional ‘auditory intrusion’ from the adjoining table, where a lively and cheerful gathering was evidently enjoying its own exchange, the spillover of animated conversation frequently competed with our own discussions. A few observations and clarifications sought by participants were inevitably lost in the ambient noise. Yet, such interruptions are perhaps part of the character of any vibrant club environment, where multiple conversations coexist under one roof.

If anything, the experience served as a gentle reminder that meaningful dialogue flourishes best when accompanied by mutual consideration and an awareness that every table may have its own story worth listening to. Notwithstanding these minor distractions, the Seventeenth Friday Evening proved, like its sixteen predecessors, to be a thoroughly engaging, intellectually stimulating, and rewarding experience. Listening to the narratives of our two guests, particularly PV Ramesh, was both enlightening and thought-provoking, combining lived experience with insights of considerable academic and practical value.

Dr PV Ramesh drew our attention through the breadth of his experience and the candour of his reflections. A physician by education and an international development professional by practice, his professional journey spans nearly four decades across diverse domains, including public policy, public health, financial management, governance reform, organisational strategy, and sustainable development. Much of his service was spent in tribal regions, where administration often demands not merely official authority but sensitivity, patience, and a deep understanding of local realities.

Participants listened with keen interest as he recalled being the first Sub-Collector of both Utnoor and Mulugu after they were constituted as separate sub-divisions, assignments that offered him a unique opportunity to engage closely with tribal communities and grassroots governance. One revelation from Dr Ramesh’s narrative came as a surprise to many around the table. Despite a distinguished career that saw him occupy several important positions in government and public institutions, he disclosed that he had never served as a District Collector.

While much of the evening’s conversation revolved around the experiences shared by Dr PV Ramesh, nevertheless, the presence of former IPS officer Dr J Purnachandra Rao added an equally significant dimension to the gathering. During a distinguished police career spanning more than three decades, he rose to the highest rank in the service, that of Director General of Police (DGP).

Over the years, he held several important assignments, including Director General, Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB), Telangana, and later Director General, Vigilance and Enforcement, a position he held until his retirement. He also chaired the Police Recruitment Boards of both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana at different points in time and served as Inspector General of Police for the Warangal Range.

Dr Purnachandra Rao earned a reputation for handling sensitive and complex responsibilities with professionalism and composure. Among the most challenging assignments of his career was his role as Deputy Inspector General in the Special Intelligence Branch, where he was closely associated with critical peace talks involving Naxalite groups. Beyond policing, he also demonstrated administrative capability as Vice-Chairman and Managing Director of the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC), where his tenure was widely regarded as efficient and result-oriented.

His contributions to public service were recognised through several distinguished honours, including the President’s Police Medal for Distinguished Service, the Indian Police Medal for Meritorious Service, and the Police Medal for Gallantry. Following his retirement from the police service, Dr Purnachandra Rao continued his engagement with public affairs, including a stint as Head of Airport City Administration in the GMR Group.

Subsequently, he entered social and political life with a focus on issues relating to social justice and the empowerment of Backward Classes, Scheduled Castes, and minority communities. Presently serving as the National Coordinator of the All India Bahujan Samaj Party (AIBSP), he remains actively involved in public causes. Although he spoke only briefly during the evening, the experiences he shared reflected a lifetime of service across law enforcement, administration, and public engagement, adding another valuable perspective to the rich exchange of ideas that characterised the seventeenth Friday gathering.

Among the many experiences shared by Dr PV Ramesh during the evening, the most Interesting one, was literally a heart touching real life learning story to the next generation of civil servants. This happened when he got his first posting as first Sub-Collector Mulugu, after it was transformed as a Sub Division from the revenue Division. Serving as a Sub-Collector is an IAS officer's critical first independent test, granting them vital Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) powers.

They wield the authority to conduct the magisterial inquests into suspicious deaths or custodial casualties. This particular incident at the very beginning of his administrative career held the gathering spellbound amidst ‘auditory intrusion’ from the adjoining table. More than the event itself, it was the manner in which he narrated it, with clarity, humour, and remarkable attention to detail, that brought the episode alive. The story dates back to his first day as Sub-Collector, Mulugu, a newly created subdivision, when he was 25 years old and afresh in public service.

That first day happened to be a Sunday. Having just arrived and possessing little knowledge of the locality, he had neither official accommodation nor a clear idea about the whereabouts of the newly established Sub-Collector’s office. Faced with limited options, he arranged temporary stay in the residence of an Electrical Engineer, much of which was covered by a zinc-sheet roof. After the journey and the formalities of arrival, he looked forward to some much-needed rest. However, events had other plans.

No sooner had he settled down than there was a knock on the door. On opening it, he found a police constable who appeared rather urgent and requested him to accompany him immediately to meet the District Superintendent of Police. Assuming it to be a routine courtesy call, Dr Ramesh readily agreed, expecting the meeting to be somewhere nearby. He was escorted into a vehicle and the journey began. As the vehicle continued to move farther and farther away from the town limits, curiosity gave way to concern.

Repeatedly he asked the accompanying personnel where they were headed. The response remained unchanged: ‘Nearby... nearby... almost there... reached, reached.’ As the journey progressed, daylight began to fade. The surroundings gradually transformed into forest terrain, unfamiliar and increasingly isolated. By the time they finally arrived at their destination, darkness had almost set in. There, he was received by the district’s top police officer, who appeared visibly relieved at his arrival.

Surrounded by a sizeable police contingent, the Superintendent greeted him warmly and, in Dr Ramesh’s recollection, said words he remembers to this day: ‘Welcome, Ramesh. You are the only available Magistrate now.’ Until that moment, he had little idea why he had been brought there. The purpose soon became clear. He was requested to conduct an inquest on a dead body. Neither the precise circumstances nor the location had been disclosed to him earlier. Drawing upon the legal training received during probation, Dr Ramesh politely declined, pointing out that he had been specifically instructed never to conduct an inquest after sunset.

The officers persisted, requesting that he at least come and see the body. Eventually, he agreed to have a look. What followed was an unexpected trek through paddy fields and difficult terrain in near darkness. After covering a considerable distance, fatigue began to set in. At one stage, when he expressed his inability to proceed further, those accompanying him literally supported him by holding him on their shoulders so that the journey could continue. What happened thereafter, as Dr Ramesh himself observed with characteristic restraint, is a different story.

The police achieved their immediate objective by ensuring his presence at the required location, and the necessary legal formalities were eventually completed the following day. The return journey proved no less memorable. Once again, he had to be physically assisted over parts of the difficult terrain before reaching the point from which the vehicle journey resumed. By the time he finally returned to Mulugu, it was around three o’clock in the morning. Sleep had barely begun when another knock disturbed the silence.

Opening the door, he was astonished to find a senior police officer, above even the district chief, waiting to invite him to breakfast as a gesture of gratitude for his assistance. Barely six weeks later, Dr Ramesh would be transferred as the first Sub-Collector of the newly created Utnoor Sub-Division following the Allampally encounter and the declaration of Adilabad as a ‘Model District.’

What began as an unexpected Sunday adventure thus became one of the earliest and most unforgettable lessons in the unpredictability of public service. Adding a touch of humour to the recollection, Dr Ramesh revealed that only a few days later, before his transfer from Mulugu, he discovered that the destination to which he had been painstakingly led through fields and difficult terrain was not the four kilometres he had been made to believe at the time, but less than a quarter of a kilometre away.

The disclosure evoked considerable amusement around the table, not merely because of the distance involved, but because it perfectly captured the gentility of a young officer encountering the realities of field administration for the first time. Indeed, much of the seventeenth Friday Evening unfolded through such engaging narratives, stories that combined experience with insight, humour with reflection, and personal memory with larger lessons in public service and governance.

Equally intriguing was the story behind what might have been. In 1994, orders were issued posting him as Collector of Medak district. However, circumstances took an unexpected turn when political leaders from different parties reportedly appealed against the posting, leading the Government headed by NT Rama Rao to withdraw the appointment. What appeared, at least on the surface, to be a missed opportunity became instead a turning point in his career.

Ramesh was subsequently appointed Director of Tribal Welfare and Ex-Officio Secretary to Government, a position that enabled him to contribute to policy and institutional development on a much wider scale. In retrospect, the episode offered a telling illustration of how public careers are often shaped as much by unforeseen circumstances as by personal choice, and how apparent setbacks can sometimes open the door to larger responsibilities and lasting contributions.

Beyond his extensive experience in several Integrated Tribal Development Agencies (ITDAs), established to deliver public services, welfare programmes, and development initiatives to Scheduled Tribes, Dr PV Ramesh’s career remained closely associated with tribal development and grassroots governance. As Project Officer, ITDA, Rampachodavaram, he coordinated the implementation of multi-sectoral programmes aimed at the sustainable economic development of nearly seven million tribal people across the erstwhile Andhra Pradesh.

It was during his tenure that the Tribal Cultural Museum was inaugurated, reflecting his commitment not only to development but also to the preservation of tribal heritage. He also served as Joint Collector in Karimnagar, Mahbubnagar, and Chittoor districts, gaining wide administrative experience across diverse regions. His administrative journey subsequently expanded into several key leadership positions. Dr Ramesh mentioned that, he served as Additional Chief Secretary and Principal Advisor to the Chief Minister, with Cabinet Minister Rank, besides holding important portfolios such as Principal Secretary, Finance, Medical and Health in the erstwhile Andhra Pradesh Government.

At this point, the conversation took a particularly moving turn when Mallepally Lakshmaiah recalled an episode that connected public policy with personal experience. He remembered how, during Dr PV Ramesh’s tenure as Principal Secretary, Finance, he, along with another representative, had approached the Government seeking enhancement of the remuneration paid to Grama Sevikas, locally known in some areas as Neeradis or Sunkaris. Dr Ramesh processed the proposal, resulting in the monthly remuneration being doubled from Rs 3000 to R 6000.

Recalling this decision in Dr Ramesh’s presence, Lakshmaiah became visibly reflective as he spoke about his father, whom he affectionately referred to as Ayya. His father had served as a Sunkari, following a hereditary family occupation, and had passed away nearly five decades ago. Though the remuneration in those days was a mere Rs 5 per month, he continued in the role with dedication, sustained by a sense of duty and tradition. The recollection added a deeply human dimension to the discussion, illustrating how administrative decisions often touch lives in ways that statistics alone cannot capture.

Then Ramesh mentioned that, he also served as Chairman and Managing Director of the Rural Electrification Corporation (REC), Director-General of the National Archives of India, and held several senior assignments with national and international institutions. His professional engagement extended across the Asia-Pacific region, Africa, West Asia, the Arab States, and Europe, providing him with a broad global perspective on governance, development, public finance, and institutional transformation.

 Dr PV Ramesh’s professional engagements extended well beyond India. Over the course of his career, he visited more than thirty countries across Asia, Africa, West Asia, Europe, and North America. A significant phase of his journey was his distinguished thirteen-year association with the United Nations system, where he held important diplomatic and operational responsibilities, particularly with the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).

A specialised United Nations Agency and International Financial Institution, IFAD is dedicated to reducing poverty and hunger in rural areas of developing countries by strengthening rural economies and supporting smallholder farmers, fishers, and rural entrepreneurs. Dr Ramesh specialised in development finance and the formulation of national strategic plans. Notably, he served as Country Programme Manager for the Asia-Pacific Division of IFAD and worked closely with organisations such as UNOPS and UNFPA, overseeing sustainable rural development portfolios and development initiatives across the region.

The discussion and conversation further offered an opportunity to appreciate the long and often demanding journey of an All-India Service officer. An IAS officer typically begins as an Assistant Collector under training, progresses through field assignments such as Sub-Collector, Joint Collector, Project Officer of an Integrated Tribal Development Agency (ITDA), District Collector, Municipal Commissioner, or Chief Executive Officer of a Zilla Parishad, before moving into increasingly senior policy-making roles in State Governments, the Government of India, public sector institutions, and international organisations.

The ascent may eventually culminate in positions such as Principal Secretary, Additional Chief Secretary, Chief Secretary, or, at the national level, Union Secretary and Cabinet Secretary. The career progression of an IPS officer broadly follows a similar trajectory. While not every officer reaches the highest positions, the journeys of Dr PV Ramesh and Dr J Purnachandra Rao illustrate how young officers who begin their careers respectively as Sub-Collectors and Assistant Superintendents of Police can, through experience, dedication, and leadership, rise to occupy some of the most significant positions in public service.