Of Smart Cards, SIR, Makhtedars,
and Shadow Kingmakers
Eighteenth Friday Evening
Multilogue at Press Club
Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao
(June Month 12, 2026)
The
Eighteenth Friday Evening Gathering at Press Club Hyderabad unfolded around a
set of diverse yet unexpectedly interconnected themes, making it one of the
more engaging sessions in the continuing series. The conversation moved
seamlessly across subjects as varied as the introduction of Smart Cards at the
Press Club, the proposed Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls,
the historical institution of Makhtedars, and the informal influence once
exercised by certain individuals in shaping outcomes within institutional
spaces.
Adding
to the evening's ambience was a noticeable contrast from the previous
gathering. In place of distracting noise from an adjoining table, there was a
parallel congregation of nearly ten veteran citizens, most of them in their plus
eighties, engaged in animated conversation of their own. Their presence created
a backdrop of shared fellowship, subtly reinforcing the spirit of dialogue and
collective reflection that has increasingly come to characterize these Friday Evenings.
The
evening's conversation opened with the introduction of the subject of Smart
Cards at the Hyderabad Press Club, marking a transition from the traditional
identity cards that had served members for decades. From there, the discussion
moved to the proposed Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls,
scheduled to commence on June 25, 2026 as announced earlier in the day by the
Telangana Chief Electoral Officer. The dialogue then turned to the historical
institution of the Makhtedar, a title once associated with major landholders
who held Maqta estates under the erstwhile Hyderabad State.
While
the title Makhtedar has long lost its administrative significance, the subject
evoked reflections on social change, shifting economic realities, and the
gradual transformation of traditional structures over time. Interestingly, the
conversation then moved to what one participant described as the role of an ‘Unofficial
Kingmaker’ or more precisely as ‘Shadow Kingmaker’ in club institutional
affairs. Recollections surfaced of a period nearly two decades ago when certain
paid staff members of the Press Club were widely perceived to wield influence
disproportionate to their designated responsibilities.
One
participant recalled occasions when one or two staff members, including a
senior employee, openly expressed confidence in his ability to influence the
electoral fortunes of contestants in Club elections. Whether such assertions
reflected reality, perception, or a combination of both, the discussion revived
memories of a phase when the outcomes of certain contests were believed by many
to have been influenced by factors beyond the visible electoral process, at
least on couple of occasions. The conversation naturally broadened into a
reflection on institutional governance.
Participants
observed that membership-driven organisations derive their strength from the
confidence of their members and the integrity of their democratic processes.
When paid staff, whose primary responsibility is to facilitate the functioning
of an institution, come to be perceived as influencing leadership contests or
organisational direction, the distinction between administration and governance
begins to blur.
The
discussion underscored the importance of maintaining clear boundaries between
elected leadership and administrative support structures, so that institutional
credibility remains firmly anchored in the members. This reflection emerged in
an unexpected context.
Later,
a steward requested some participants to produce their Press Club identity
cards, not the conventional membership card, but the newly introduced Smart
Card. The development generated immediate interest. Enthusiastic as ever, Saye
Sekhar volunteered to collect them and returned not only with his own, but also
those belonging to Amar and a few others. For several participants, it marked
their first direct encounter with the Press Club's new Smart Card initiative,
which soon became a subject of discussion in its own right.
As
the evening progressed, and social refreshments accompanied the conversation,
the newly introduced Smart Card emerged as a subject of interest. The
discussion, initiated by Amar and joined by others, focused on its potential to
serve as a secure and integrated membership tool for access, identification,
and transactions within the Club. Participants observed that many established
social and service clubs have gradually moved towards such systems.
Participants
felt, they would simplify operations, reduce dependence on manual processes,
and enhance institutional efficiency. The introduction of the Smart Card at the
Hyderabad Press Club was viewed as a welcome step in that direction, reflecting
an effort to align a five-decade-old institution with evolving practices. At
the same time, it was felt that the true value of the initiative would lie not
merely in possessing the card, but in the effectiveness and utility of the
systems that support it.
A
substantial part of the evening was devoted to the proposed Special Intensive
Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, a subject introduced and explained by
Hanumanth Rao. The exercise, announced for implementation later this month,
seeks to update and authenticate voter records through an extensive
verification process. The discussion touched upon its legal basis,
administrative objectives, and the broader questions it has generated in the
public domain.
Participants
noted that the exercise is intended to improve the accuracy of electoral rolls
and address concerns such as duplicate or outdated entries. However, the
participants also observed that, it has also attracted criticism from sections
of political opinion and civil society, particularly on issues relating to
implementation, documentation requirements, and the possibility of unintended
exclusion. The conversation reflected the complexity of balancing electoral
integrity with inclusiveness, underscoring the importance of transparency,
public awareness, and effective execution in any exercise of such scale.
Then,
the discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) also touched upon some
of the concerns being expressed in public discourse. Participants noted that
while the exercise is intended to improve the accuracy of electoral rolls
through extensive field verification, questions have been raised regarding
documentation requirements, the possibility of unintended exclusions, and the
need to ensure that no eligible voter is disadvantaged in the process.
The
conversation acknowledged both perspectives: the importance of maintaining
accurate voter databases and the equally important obligation of safeguarding
democratic participation through transparency, fairness, and effective
implementation. More than the procedural aspects, however, it was an
observation by Hanumanth Rao that added a human dimension to the discussion.
Recounting a recent interaction with a friend whose name no longer appeared in
the electoral rolls after multiple changes of residence over the years, he
explained the steps required for restoration and re-registration.
The
friend's response, however, prompted deeper reflection. He questioned what
tangible loss he would suffer if his name did not figure in the voters' list
and whether the effort involved was worth undertaking. The anecdote led
participants to reflect on a larger concern that extends beyond electoral rolls
themselves: the gradual erosion of civic engagement and the declining value
many citizens attach to their vote.
In
that sense, the discussion moved beyond administrative processes to the broader
challenge of sustaining public participation in democratic life. It was felt
that the ultimate success of exercises such as SIR would depend not only on
accurate verification, but also on strengthening citizens' awareness of the
significance of their electoral rights and responsibilities.
An
equally engaging recollection emerged from a Door Darshan programme hosted by
Hanumanth Rao nearly two decades ago, when he conducted a walk-and-talk
(Vijetha) interview with Amar during the latter's tenure as Chairman of the AP
Press Academy. In the course of that conversation, Amar had spoken candidly
about his childhood, describing how, despite his family's ancestral association
with substantial landholdings in the Warangal region, his own upbringing was
rooted in the realities of a lower middle-class household.
Amar
recalled periods of financial hardship and the everyday adjustments that
accompanied them, including memories of sleeping on the floor wrapped in old
newspapers during difficult times. The telecast, Amar reminisced, drew an
unexpected reaction from a close family elder, his father’s younger brother, Devulapalli
Prabhakar Rao. Taking exception to the portrayal of hardship, he reminded Amar
of the family's historical standing as Makhtedars of several (9) villages and
felt that the account understated that legacy.
The
incident, recalled in a lighter vein, sparked a thoughtful exchange on how
family memory often preserves inherited prestige, while individual experience
is shaped by the circumstances of a particular generation. In that distinction
lay a revealing glimpse into the social transitions that many families
experienced across the decades. Recalling the episode further, Amar remarked,
with characteristic candour, that he himself knew little about the villages
associated with the family's Makhtedar legacy and that such memories perhaps
belonged more to his grandparents' generation than to his own.
The
disagreement, however, left a lasting impression. According to Amar, his uncle,
the late Devulapalli Prabhakar Rao, did not speak to him for nearly four years
after the telecast. The recollection carried an added historical footnote, as
Prabhakar Rao later went on to serve as the first Chairman of the Official
Language Commission constituted during the tenure of K. Chandrashekar Rao as
Chief Minister. The anecdote also highlighted a larger social transition.
Across generations, many families moved from the prestige of inherited
landownership to the uncertainties of urban life.
In
Amar's case, the memory of ancestral Makhtedar status coexisted with the lived
experience of a modest lower middle-class upbringing. The contrast illustrated
how inherited identity and personal reality do not always travel together,
often reflecting the profound economic and social transformations experienced
by families across the Deccan during the twentieth century. The discussion also
prompted a broader reflection on the experience of many families whose fortunes
changed with the passage of time.
The
generation immediately preceding Amar's, like countless others across the
region, witnessed the gradual decline of traditional agrarian structures and
the migration of families from rural estates to expanding urban centres. In the
process, inherited status often proved less enduring than changing economic
realities. Landholdings became fragmented or difficult to sustain, and families
accustomed to social prominence found themselves adapting to entirely new
circumstances in cities that placed greater value on education, professional
competence, and personal endeavour than on ancestral distinction.
Viewed
in that context, Amar's recollections resonated beyond an individual life
story. They reflected a larger social journey experienced by many families
whose memories carried echoes of former prosperity, while their daily lives
were shaped by modest means and disciplined striving. If earlier generations
had inherited position, subsequent generations were often required to create
opportunity anew.
The
conversation recognised that such transitions, though frequently accompanied by
hardship and dislocation, also produced stories of resilience, adaptation, and
achievement that became defining features of post-Independence social mobility.
Then, the evening's reflections acquired an additional personal touch through a
recent milestone in Amar's life. Having celebrated his seventieth birthday two
days earlier, on June 10, 2026, with family members, friends, and well-wishers,
he recalled one among several memories that had resurfaced during the occasion.
Referring
to a photograph included in a collage prepared by his daughter-in-law, he
pointed to an image showing a group of journalists seated in a narrow lane
outside the residence of the late NT Rama Rao, awaiting a press interaction.
Among those captured in that moment from another era was A Saye Sekhar, a
detail that prompted both recognition and reminiscence. The photograph served
as a quiet reminder of a generation of journalists whose professional journeys
have unfolded alongside many of the political and social transformations
discussed during these Friday gatherings.
With
veteran journalist Venugopal Kadempally joining the Friday Evening Multilogue
for the first time, the eighteenth gathering brought together Amar Devulapalli,
Bhandaru Srinivasa Rao, Mallepally Lakshmaiah, BS Ramakrishna, A Saye Sekhar,
Hanumanth Rao, GK Murthy, Subbarao, Yazi, and myself. As conversations
traversed subjects ranging from institutional change and electoral processes to
social mobility, memory, and journalism, the evening once again demonstrated
how seemingly unrelated themes often converge through shared experience and
collective reflection.
As
the circle of conversation continues to widen with each passing Friday, it is
hoped that more colleagues, friends, and well-wishers will find time to join
these informal exchanges. After all, the richness of a multilogue lies not
merely in the subjects discussed, but in the diversity of experiences and
perspectives that come together around the table.
End of the 18th Friday Meeting on June 12, 2026.



















