Srisailam Hydro Electric Project
Facts and Realities
Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao
The Srisailam Hydro Electric Project was conceived in the year 1963. Subsequently
the words “Hydro Electric” were omitted and named as Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy
Sagar Srisailam Project. The Left Bank Power house has been shifted to the
Right bank. The Power House envisaged generating pump power of 260MW at 60% Load
Factor. The Commission on Project Plan (COPP) has recommended the power
potential to increase to 377MW at 60% Load Factor by lowering the MDDL (Minimum
Draw Down Level) of the Reservoir from 854feet to 830feet level.
Bachawat Tribunal did not make any allocation for Srisailam
Hydro-electric project since it is meant for generating power and would not involve
any consumptive use of water except for evaporation losses. The Tribunal however, has allocated 33TMC of
water towards the annual evaporation losses in Srisailam Reservoir. The storage
reservoir at Srisailam involves annual evaporation losses of 33TMC, and
therefore regulated releases from the reservoir are necessary for downstream
irrigation. Bachawat Tribunal in another Report reiterated that Srisailam is a
Hydro-electric Project for generating power without diverting to any other
watershed, which does not involve consumptive use of water except for
evaporation losses and there is no irrigation component.
Thus, the Bachawat Tribunal has clarified in no uncertain terms that
Srisailam Reservoir is meant purely for generating power without diverting any
water to water shed except for irrigation to downstream. But the subsequent Governments have changed
scope of the Project and introduced irrigation elements into the Project. Srisailam Right Bank Canal and Telugu Ganga
Canal for supply of water to Chennai City have been projected by the erstwhile
Andhra Pradesh Government and obtained sanction from the Central Government.
The MDDL of Srisailam Project as envisaged in the Report was at 854feet. However, the Bachawat Tribunal recommended it
to be in between 838feet and 830feet. While 838 feet level was accepted by the
Government of Andhra Pradesh, 833 level was recommended by the COPP. Ultimately the Government of Andhra Pradesh
has fixed the MDDL of the Reservoir as 834feet vide G.O.Ms.No.69 dated
15.6.1996.
Srisailam Right Bank Canal was
cleared in the year 1994 with allocation of 19TMC of dependable flows of river
Krishna obtained from the savings accrued from other Projects. As per the Project Report prepared by
Government of Andhra Pradesh a major portion of 19TMC of water amounting to
11.6 TMC is the crop water requirements in the Rabi season and has to be drawn from flood flows to be
stored in the reservoirs at ‘Gorakallu’
and ‘Owk’. A quantity of 5.5 TMC only is
proposed to be supplied directly from the canal for irrigation requirement of
the crops in Kharif season under normal flow conditions.
As far as Telugu Ganga is concerned,
for supply of drinking water to Chennai city an allocation of 15TMC was made.
This is based on the dependable flows and through an agreement reached between
the States of Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. The States
of Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Karnataka would be contributing 5TMC
each. The entire quantity is to be drawn
during the period from July to October.
G.O.69 was issued in the year
1996. It accords priority to drinking
water than to power generation followed by irrigation supply to NS Canals, Prakasham
Barrage, SRBC, Telugu Ganga and SLBC. The G.O was issued to take care of
interests of the Andhra region without bothering about Telangana region. The
Madras water was accorded priority over Hyderabad water supply though the city
is in Krishna basin where as madras not. Irrigation for Telugu Ganga got priority
over SLBC. Irrigation for Krishna Delta (Prakasham Barrage) gained priority
over Nagarjunasagar Canals.
However, G.O.69 permits the supply of water for irrigation as well as for
power generation up to 834feet, which is the MDDL of Srisailam Project. G.O. 107 issued later, in September, 2005
changed the MDDL from 834feet to 854feet. This was done with an intention to
supply water to the Rayalaseema Projects through Pothireddipadu Regulator whose
sill level is 841feet. Subsequently,
G.O.233 was issued in December, 2005 specifying that the operation rules for
Srisailam and Nagarjunasagar Projects prescribed in G.O.Ms.69 are also
applicable for the drawls from Pothireddipadu Regulator. The G.O.69 was
violated continuously. The then Government released waters to Srisailam and
Nagarjunasagar Project below the MDDL of 834feet for irrigation, power and
drinking purposes as and when it felt necessary. The argument put forward then
was, that the state was at liberty to effect modification in the mode of
supply, manner of supply and to determine the manner and the priority in which
available waters are to be utilized and managed.
The Government of Andhra Pradesh grievance against Government of
Telangana is that it is withdrawing large quantity of waters from the Srisailam
Reservoir for power generation with the result that levels are falling alarmingly which would result in acute scarcity in drinking water and irrigation for
Rayalaseema population who depend on
Krishna waters. As such they requested
the Krishna River Management Board to order the Government of Telangana to stop
power production immediately at Srisailam and the Board accepted their version
and ordered Telangana State to discontinue power production with effect from
November 2, 2014.
The power crisis in Telangana is caused mainly due to violation of Power Purchase
Agreements by the Government of Andhra Pradesh as provided in the A.P. State Reorganization
Act. One of the alternates to meet the crisis
is to generate power from Srisailam Reservoir. Withdrawal of water from
Srisailam for the purpose of Power generation would not have any adverse effect
on the downstream region and all the waters that were released for power
generation would be available in Nagarjunasagar Reservoir without any wastage
into sea. Government of Telangana
neither violated in consuming more than its share nor it has gone down the
permitted level as envisaged in G.O.Ms.No.69.
Further, the waters used by Telangana State for power consumption was utilized
for lifting the waters from bore-wells for irrigation in the water scarcity
areas and the regenerated flows would join Krishna basin itself. But, the water
supplied to the Rayalaseema for irrigation purposes, the regenerated flows would
join the Pennar basin. Further, the
water used for generation of power by Telangana State would be available in
Nagarjunasagar Project for providing irrigation as well as power
generation. Thus the benefits are two-fold
in respect of irrigation and power for every unit of water released from
Srisailam whereas in case of Rayalaseema it is only for irrigation without any
benefit of power generation. Power produced at Srisailam is exclusively used
for farming purpose only.
The functions of Krishna River Management Board are to regulate the
supply of water to both the States in accordance with either the Tribunal Award
or any agreements and other arrangements that have been arrived between the erstwhile
State of Andhra Pradesh and other States or Union Territory. The Board has no
authority to allocate the waters to the successor States, which is the
prerogative of Tribunal. It has no brief to intervene in power production and
cannot order Telangana to stop producing power. End
If the board has no authority then why did the state of telengana not refuse the boards mediation in the first place?
ReplyDelete