The Narrative of Navigating Human Ecologies
29th Friday Evening Team Meet (FETE)
Making a Difference
October
23, 2026: Press Club Hyderabad
Vanam
Jwala Narasimha Rao (October 24, 2026)
The
twenty-ninth consecutive gathering of like-minded journalist friends at the
Press Club Hyderabad unfolded as a deeply reflective session that fundamentally
altered the trajectory of the group’s ongoing weekly conversations. Moving away
from the celebratory milestone of the previous week, the evening transitioned
into a profound, objective exploration of the complex human ecologies that
define public life, professional careers, and institutional governance.
The
gathering saw a shift in its participant dynamics, welcoming back Saye Sekhar,
accompanied by his former bank officer friend Ramesh, and also Lalita Iyer,
whose presence had been missed during the previous session. Conversely, senior
journalist Amar was unable to participate due to a sudden pressing urgency,
leaving the core table to be anchored by Murthy, Subba Rao, Bharath Babu, and I.
Club Secretary Ramesh greeted and was with us for dew minutes, extending his
normal courtesies.
This
specific alignment of analytical minds naturally steered the conversational
convergence away from light anecdotes and toward a rigorous, message-oriented
analysis of human behavior, professional ambition, and historical memory. The
core thematic focus of the multilogue centered on a critical examination of the
diverse array of personalities that media and PR professionals encounter over
decades of active public service.
Across
careers spanning journalism, politics, social activism, and the state
bureaucracy, the participants mapped out the behavioral spectrum of individuals
of immense reputation, popularity, and influence. Objectively stripping away
the veneer of public relations, the table analyzed the dualities inherent in
leadership and authority. The discussion candidly categorized these figures.
They
vary as: contrasting those who deeply value lifelong professional friendships
with those characterized by erratic uniqueness, unpredictable infamy, or
deep-seated idiosyncrasies. FETE Members observed that the pressure of
navigating high-stakes public environments often breeds split-minded tendencies
or a propensity to ill-treat subordinates, political juniors, and peers alike. The
FETE members reached a near consensus regarding a troubling behavioral pattern
among certain political elites.
Despite
receiving crucial assistance in the nascent phases of their careers, these
figures conveniently forget their benefactors upon climbing the ladder of power
‘by hook or by crook.’ This opportunistic shift stands in sharp contrast to the
exemplary, supportive approach historically demonstrated by their own
illustrious families under similar circumstances. Using a poignant structural
metaphor, the participants conceptualized these figures as mere airline or
railway passengers: people who willingly share a temporary journey but feel no
lasting loyalty to those beside them once they reach their destination.
Some
remain in perpetual, meaningful contact, while others fade entirely into
obscurity, completely unaware of what it truly means to maintain a human or
professional touch within a fast-evolving social landscape. This analytical
framework naturally expanded into an exploration of the dynamic boundaries of
career mobility and institutional power. The participants examined the
trajectories of individuals who excelled in their respective fields by
beginning their journeys at the bottom or middle tiers of organizational
hierarchies, only to eventually occupy the highest available positions of
authority.
The
table reached an objective consensus that such rapid ascent is rarely
accidental; rather, it is the result of a zealous, calculated pursuit of power,
often executed by employing every tactical and strategic mechanism available
within corporate or political frameworks. This observation provided a perfect
segue for the sharing of deep, firsthand institutional histories. I for myself,
contributed a detailed exposition drawn from over five decades of close
association with political titans, media leaders, and the foundational core of
the state bureaucracy, alongside grassroots activist networks working for
community welfare.
My
professional journey included indirect associations with four to five Chief
Ministers, and crucially, direct PR engagement with two formidable Chief
Ministers: one of Erstwhile Andhra Pradesh and the other Telangana’s first CM. The
table based on my revelations and drawn from my experience and association, analyzed
how these two leaders collectively shaped contemporary history: one laying the
rigorous institutional foundation for statehood, while the other strategically
realized the actual achievement of a separate Telangana state.
However,
the FETE members as a consensus also deliberated on ‘How they Could Have Done
Better’ as leaders in engaging human relations. These reflections were further
enriched by objective insights derived from my close collaboration with the
Governor of the erstwhile unified Andhra Pradesh, as well as my time navigating
the high-level educational mandates of the Apex State Training Institute. A
particular narrative from my experience that resonated deeply with the FETE
members was the 1989 Lok Sabha-Assembly Election scenario.
The
unexpected defeat of serving Chief Minister NT Rama Rao in the Kalvakurthy
Assembly Segment, alongside the broader defeat of the TDP across the state, vividly
illustrated how heads of some highly influential non-governmental organizations
(NGOs) can decisively sway political outcomes. It goes without saying that, one
such influence resulted in securing a comfortable majority by Chittaranjan Das,
who eventually became a Minister in Dr Channa Reddy’s cabinet. And for some he was
then: ‘Giant Killer.’
The
historical depth of the evening deepened as GK Murthy provided a sobering,
counter-balancing narrative regarding the immense institutional vulnerabilities
faced by media professionals. Murthy recounted the horrifying administrative
and political realities of the 1975 National Emergency, meticulously explaining
how the severe suspension of civil liberties and intense state censorship
directly impacted his technical job and early career path.
This
historical testimony served as a vital case study for the younger participants,
demonstrating how macroeconomic and political shifts can abruptly alter
individual professional trajectories. Building upon this narrative of media
resilience, Saye Sekhar and Lalita Iyer shared critical milestones from their
own respective journalistic journeys, emphasizing the evolving ethical
responsibilities and operational challenges encountered by investigative
reporters across different eras.
A
central, unifying focal point of the night’s historical retrospection was the
objective commemoration of the late Adiraju Venkateshwar Rao, a towering figure
in Indian journalism who carved out an indelible legacy not only within
Hyderabad but also across the highly competitive national media landscapes of
New Delhi. The table remembered Adiraju as an exceptionally lively, serious,
deeply knowledgeable, and uncompromising journalist throughout his entire life.
To
illustrate his profound national impact, the participants reconstructed an
iconic historical moment from a largely attended press conference in New Delhi,
where the then Prime Minister of India, Late PV Narasimha Rao, explicitly
pointed him out by name, acknowledging his sharp presence with the call of ‘Adiraju.’
Beyond his fierce professional independence, the group fondly and objectively
reminisced about Adiraju’s enduring legacy of mentorship, highlighting his
ever-prepared, innately helping nature that constantly lifted younger reporters
entering the field.
As
the evening drew toward its natural conclusion, the intellectual rigor of the
multilogue was balanced by the traditional elements of the Press Club
gatherings, with Social (Drink) refreshments, shared snacks, light-hearted
laughter, and moments of genuine camaraderie dominating the table before the
session officially concluded. The 29th gathering successfully
reinforced the eternal motto of the team, setting a sophisticated baseline of
institutional memory and historical analysis that seamlessly paves the way for
the next consecutive Friday meeting.


No comments:
Post a Comment