TELEPHONE: FROM BELL TO SURVEILLANCE
VANAM JWALA NARASIMHA RAO
The Hans India
(29-06-2025)
{Initially, the
telephone was limited to few cities in the United States and Europe, with
subscribers speaking through manual exchanges operated by human switchboards.
In India, the telephone made its debut in 1882, linking Kolkata and Mumbai with
rudimentary technology. For a long time, waiting lists stretched into years,
and recommendations or bribes became routine for getting telephone connections}-Editor
Synoptic Note
On March 10, 1876, when
Alexander Graham Bell first uttered ‘Mr Watson, come here, I want to see you’
to his assistant Thomas Watson, into his simple apparatus, it sizzled across
American Continent. The device named Telephone by Bell, set the world on a
course, that connected voices across continents. The innovative discovery meant
for communication, is now used indiscriminately for surveillance and a tool of
control.
Had Great Inventors
like Bell, Edison, and Oppenheimer been alive today, they might be found
sitting quietly at some isolated corner, being old, wrinkled, and unrecognized,
murmuring among themselves, on their brainchildren.
Bell would sigh, ‘I
invented the telephone for human connection, not for tapping secrets.’
Edison would shake his head, ‘I lit up the world, and now people waste their
nights glowing in front of nonsense.’ With a heavy heart, Oppenheimer might
mutter, ‘I split the atom to harness energy, and they used it to split
nations.’ Just then, Newton would stroll in, pointing to a recent plane
crash, and say, ‘Even gravity now could be accused of terrorism.’ They
would all nod in reluctant agreement: ‘Next time, we will invent sleeping
pills instead of science, manufactured as joint venture with Artificial
Intelligence!”
In recent weeks,
Telangana has found itself at the center of a storm, one not driven by ideology
or governance models, but by silence, suspicion, and surveillance. The
unfolding controversy dating back to KCR days, surfaced when a senior police
officer confessed accusing BRS government of using police machinery to monitor
the phone conversations of leaders of opposition parties. The Special
Investigation Team (SIT) has intensified its investigation, including interrogation
of former Chief of Special Intelligence Bureau.
This alleged phone
tapping, has reopened a difficult conversation, not merely about political
overreach, but about the fine line between state vigilance and violation of citizen
rights and privacy. The democratic dilemma is, when the invisible ear of the
state begins to monitor, manipulate, or muzzle private speech, what is in store
next?
The issue at hand is
not the mere existence of surveillance. It is about its scope, its intent, and
its potential for misuse, especially when deployed against political opponents,
dissidents, or even members within one’s own machinery. The controversy points
to a legacy problem that India has carried from its colonial past into its
digital present: an unchecked culture of interception for partisan gain or
institutional insecurity.
Telangana episode takes
back into the global history of phone tapping, its justifications and
distortions, and the many layers of its political, social, economic, and
ethical impact.
The telephone, since
its invention has held the promise of human connectivity across distances
previously unimaginable. Within a year of discovery, the ‘Bell Telephone
Company’ was founded. In offices and homes of privileged few, a peculiar
object began to appear: a wooden box with a mouthpiece, a crank, and wires
stretching to a central exchange. People laughed aloud with joy, some cried,
and many simply listened, stunned, as voices leapt over silence. Next year, the
first commercial telephone exchange was opened in New Haven, Connecticut.
The telephone entered
the market not with thunder, but with the quiet wonder of the miraculous. It
was not merely communication, but it was communion across distance, a bridge
for love, business, emergency, and celebration. What the world felt in those first
years of arrival of telephone, was not just utility, but awe. A new kind of
intimacy was born, measured not in steps or miles, but in seconds and
syllables.
Alexander Graham Bell’s
telephone invention unfolded a quiet revolution across continents that would
reshape human communication. India’s tryst with the telephone began five years later,
when the Oriental Telephone Company introduced services under a British
government license. Calcutta hosted the country’s first telephone exchange,
followed by Bombay and Madras, placing India among the earliest adopters in
Asia. The service later became part of the P and T Department.
Initially, the
telephone was limited to few cities in the United States and Europe, with
subscribers speaking through manual exchanges operated by human switchboards.
In India, the telephone
made its debut in 1882, linking Kolkata and Mumbai with rudimentary technology,
before gradually extending to other cities like Chennai, Delhi, and Hyderabad. For
a long time, waiting lists stretched into years, and recommendations or bribes
became routine for getting telephone connections. OYT was very popular to get
priority connection.
In India too, prior to
automation, it was ‘Exchange through Speaking’ where operators manually
connected calls. Trunk dialing, Subscriber Trunk Dialing (STD) followed. Coinciding
the liberalization and with opening telecom to private players for a
generation, yellow and black STD and ISD booths became symbols of distant
connectivity. India's first-ever mobile phone call was made on July 31, 1995,
by West Bengal Chief Minister Jyoti Basu to Telecom Minister Sukh Ram, using a
Nokia handset on Modi Telstra's network. Then it came at a hefty cost of Rs 16
per minute.
Mid-1990s
revolutionized the landscape. With costly cellphones becoming affordable, ordinary
citizens too could carry in their pockets. With the advent of smartphones with
internet capabilities, contacts, locations, messages, finances, history,
geography, what not, all migrated into one small device. But with this
convenience came vulnerability.
A tool of empowerment turned
as device of exposure. From an elite invention to a common utility, the
telephone transformed human connection, yet with it arrived the silent shadow
of phone tapping. Eventually, over the time, the same lines that carried voices
of affection, strategy, and business began to attract the interest of those in
power, for their advantage.
Globally and in India,
this evolution of surveillance had a genesis. During World Wars, and later the
Cold Wars, phone tapping emerged as a state tool for national security.
Governments monitored calls of suspected spies, political adversaries, and even
allied leaders.
In India, the colonial
state monitored freedom fighters’ telegrams and conversations.
Post-Independence, this model carried over, with successive governments using
wiretaps through intelligence agencies and police departments. Legal cover of Telegraph
Act or Information Technology Act is just namesake. Technological developments
made surveillance easier.
As the present Telangana
government investigates into, what it alleges as a systematic misuse of state
apparatus to tap and track personal communications, some harsh realities
surface. Truth apart, phone tapping’s consequences span many dimensions, politically
and socially. People self-censor, speak in riddles, and avoid discussing
sensitive matters resulting in victims being traumatized. Activists and whistleblowers
feel watched, silenced, and unsafe. Who authorizes surveillance, who reviews
it, and what safeguards protect citizens? Million-dolor questions.
Surveillance, once
normalized without appropriate scrutiny, can infiltrate every layer of Indian democratic
fabric, across states, parties, and governments. The real solution does not lie
only in punishing the past, but in reforming the present, with future legal
safeguards, independent audit mechanisms, and a commitment to the sacredness of
personal liberty.
In a digital age where millions
of phones transmit personal moments each second, the absence of robust privacy
laws is glaring. Effectiveness of the Personal Data Protection Act in India hinges
on several factors, including the timely notification of rules, establishment
of the Data Protection Board, and the government's approach to enforcement and
exemptions. Though the Supreme Court has affirmed privacy as a fundamental
right, institutional safeguards lag far behind technological capabilities.
The issue is no longer
whether someone is listening, it is whether the system built for protection has
become a machinery of fear. As India prepares for future waves of technological
advancement, such as Artificial Intelligence, the true challenge is to balance
national security with civil liberty. Listening must never replace justice; and
silence must never be enforced by fear. In the end, the question is not whether
the state should listen, it is whether the citizen has a right not to be
overheard.


No comments:
Post a Comment