Frequent Transfer of Public Servants
Impede Responsive Government
Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao
The Pioneer (30-04-2023)
On
reading an interesting news item, prominently published in ‘The Pioneer’,
Hyderabad Edition on April 25, 2023, that, 47 IAS officers are serving in same
post for more than 3 years in Telangana State. The news item remarked that normally,
IAS officers are shifted from their departments every three years, but in
Telangana these many number of IAS officers have been holding the same post for
more than three years. ‘The Pioneer’ claimed that it has analyzed the posting
dates of IAS officers based on the data available on the TSGAD website. It further
mentioned names of couple of seniors who have been working for more than 9
years, 8 years, 7 years etc. who included some retired officers.
This
recapped the unique initiative in the area of Administrative Reforms in the
country, way back in 1997, when IK Gujral was Prime Minister for a short
duration, which included the aspect of stability of tenures to the government
functionaries. An Action Plan with 9 points for Effective and Responsive
Government was adopted in the Conference of Chief Ministers held on May 24, 1997,
which among others included, improving the performance and integrity of the
public service, streamlined and transparent transfer and promotion policy, and
stability of tenures to the government functionaries or the public servants to
sustain their morale.
Well,
25 years have gone since the Action Plan was adopted on the eve of Golden
Jubilee celebrations on completion of 50 years of Indian Independence. Now we have
celebrated Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav on completing 75 years of Independence. What
was the methodical and systematic follow-up of CM’s conference recommendation remains
as a million-dolor question. Experts in administration have not debated and
discussed it further as to whether frequent transfers are better or stability
of tenure is better for good governance!!! This might be one reason for
criticism like the one appeared in Pioneer, that, so many number of officers
have a long standing in a particular post. There is every reason to argue ’for’
and ‘against’ to this. An argument ‘for’ presents reasons and evidence why
something is true, whereas, an argument ‘against’ presents reason and evidence
why something is not true.
When
the CM’s conference of 1997, was held I was an active observer of the process
at that time, working at Dr MCR HRD Institute in Hyderabad, developing an UNDP
Module on Reform Initiatives for training of public servants that was adopted all
over the country, besides sending me for a trainers’ training program to Thames
Valley University in United Kingdom in 2000. In addition, being one of the
three members of the sub-group, constituted by the Core Group headed by the
then Additional Secretary,
Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances, by NDA government
in November 2001, I was actively associated with compiling, analyzing and
evaluating the responses from state governments.
The
deliberations of Conference of Chief Ministers presided over by the then Prime
Minister, and attended by the then Union Home Minister, Finance Minister, Law
Minister, and Minister of state for Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions,
Cabinet Secretary, Chief Secretaries of the States and Union Territories and
senior officials in the Government of India discussed meticulously the Action
Plan. In fact, the CM’s conference was preceded by an initiative through a National
Debate on Effective and Responsive administration, at a conference of Chief
Secretaries of all states and Union Territories, on November, 20, 1996, where
it was agreed in principle, that immediate corrective steps must be taken to
restore the faith of the people in the fairness, integrity, and responsiveness
of the administration, which could rebuild the credibility of the Government.
In
the CM’s meeting that followed the CS’s meeting, the Chief Ministers and
Central Ministers attending the conference strongly endorsed the need for
ensuring responsive, accountable, transparent and people friendly
administration at all levels and agreed that necessary corrective steps must be
taken to arrest the then (and may be now!) present drift in the management of
public services. The conference resolved that the central and state governments
would work together to concretize the Action Plan dealing with the theme of: Accountable and citizen-friendly Government;
Transparency and Right to Information and Improving the performance and
integrity of the public service.
The
conference noted that people-friendly and effective administration depends on
cleansing of civil services at all levels, adherence to ethical standards,
commitment to basic principles of the Constitution, and clear understanding of
the relationship regulating the politicians and the civil servants. It was
agreed that the politicization of the civil services would be curbed so as to
minimize its impact not only on the morale and motivation of the services, but
on the sustained flow of responsive services to the public and efficient
execution of schemes.
The
conference appreciated the importance of encouraging and ensuring the
commitment of the employees of public services to ethical standards and basic
principles of constitution such as secularism, social justice, attention to the
needs of weaker sections, rule of law, professionalism, and integrity. Towards
this direction, it was recognized that frequent and arbitrary transfer of
public servants affect the ability of the system to deliver services
effectively to the people, and the implementation of poverty alleviation
schemes. It was agreed that institutional arrangements should be evolved for
enabling objectives and transparent decisions on postings, promotions, and
transfers of officials, particularly those working in key areas to ensure
stability of tenure and de-politicized postings at all levels. State
Governments to implement a streamlined and transparent transfer and promotion
policy so as to ensure stability of tenures to the government functionaries and
to sustain their morale.
The
conference recognized that, as the country completes 50 years of independence,
and as the people are assailed by growing doubts about the accountability, effectiveness,
and moral standards of administration, Central and State Governments should
move together to justify the trust of faith of the people in the Government by
taking up the implementation of the Action Plan endorsed by the conference in a
time bound manner.
And
hence, a considerably longer tenure to public servants including to IAS whether
senior, junior or retired is probably more desirable than a short term. Frequent
transfers not to speak of transfers on political grounds with favoritism,
nepotism, adopting spoils system or patronage system, a practice in which some
are favored by appointment to key government posts and others are ignored is
not desirable. The very fact that umpteen number of unique, first of its kind,
nowhere in the country etc. kind of development and welfare programs are
implemented in Telangana during the past 9 years, making it a Telangana Model, speaks
volumes about the efficacy of ensuring stability of tenures to government
functionaries. (The writer is Chief Public Relations Officer to Chief
Minister, Telangana)
No comments:
Post a Comment