‘Prevention Better than Cure’ true in Economic Crimes too
Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao
The Hans India (24-03-2024)
{The allegation is that since
2014 there has been a fourfold jump in ED cases against politicians, and 95% of
them are from the Opposition. Then, what is the message coming out of this?
‘Arrest, Remand and Bail’ are components related to investigation. All these,
however, curtail personal liberty of an individual, if the authorities do not
adhere to ‘Principles of Natural Justice’ in addition to legality. Prevention
serves both scrutiny and pre-audit of the offence or initiating action
beforehand, and avoid innocent persons (at least in some cases) being
implicated on casual suspicion in the offence, and let off after longer periods
of confinement}-Synoptic Note by Editor
In the context of arrest of MLC
Kavitha by Enforcement Directorate (ED) Officials, on March 15, 2024, it is
ponderable whether, precisely not probing merits or demerits of this particular
case, could there be a comprehensive, wide-ranging, free, frank, and fair debate
and discussion, on such happenings from time to time, for a ‘National Political
Consensus.’ It is equally desirable that, Law Enforcing Authorities, would
henceforth, may perhaps be little more vigilant, attentive, careful, and
conscientious in ‘Preventing Economic Offences,’ rather than and
unpleasant post audit. What Dutch philosopher Desiderius Erasmus rightly said,
that, ‘Prevention is Better than Cure’ may be made applicable in
case of Economic Offences also.
Prevention serves both scrutiny or pre
audit of the offence or initiating action beforehand, and avoid innocent
persons (at least in some cases) being implicated on casual suspicion in the
offence, and let off after longer periods of confinement. Influential and
wealthy persons, however may manage to get scot-free, perhaps with some hiccups.
There are significant instances where absolutely innocent persons, unconnected
with offence, spending precious life as under trials, in different custodies, before
they were released by courts, when eventually charges were not proved.
Kavitha’s arrest, according to ED Officials,
preceded by due process, like introducing themselves, showing search warrant,
systematic search by the team of ED and IT Agencies for five hours, recording
voluntary statement of Kavitha etc. was necessitated in view of her involvement
in the alleged money laundering Delhi Liquor Scam, in which she was named as an
accused. Her brother KT Rama Rao’s demand for a Transit Warrant, apparently was
interpreted as, ‘Obstructing ED Officers during the enquiry’ by
ED.
Fair Enough, but, since ED and CBI questioned
her earlier, eliciting fairly good information, now hurriedly arresting her,
probably was avoidable. Instead, further interrogation would have been carried at
her residence, adhering to strict Legal Provisions. Kavitha was taken to ED
office in Delhi, and after a night’s stay there, next morning she was produced
in a Delhi Court, which remanded her to ED Custody till March 23, which was
further extended by three days. Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal was also arrested by
ED, six days later, in the same case, and was produced in Court, which remanded
him also to ED Custody till March 28.
Delhi Liquor Scam often labelled as a ‘Political
Scandal’ had its roots, when the Delhi Government’s Excise Policy from
2021 to 2022 was introduced. The allegation was that, favors to owners and
shareholders in the form of waivers, reduction of license fee and creation of
numerous licenses in exchange of bribery seems to have taken place. Kavitha and
few others were linked to a ‘South Group Lobby’ of liquor traders.
In the ED chargesheet, she was accused of paying Rs 100 crore in kickbacks to
Aam Aadmi Party leaders, in exchange for illicit advantages. Further allegation
was that, Kavitha, Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia had a political understanding.
In India, over a period, reputed and
powerful persons in the society from different fields, either were involved or implicated
in significant Prime Scams. Commonwealth Games, Adarsh Housing Society, Coal
Mining, Kingfisher Airlines (Vijay Mallya), Punjab National Bank Fraud (Nirav
Modi), Satyam (Ramalinga Raju), Saradha Group Scandal, Coalgate, 2G, ABG
Shipyard, ICICI Bank-Videocon, Yes Bank-DHFL, National Herald, Sand Mining,
Jharkhand mining etc. were among them.
Ever since ED was entrusted with
enforcement of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), hardly 5-6% of people,
from among the arrested, were held guilty by courts. Nishka Kamath of Nalanda
Law College (University of Mumbai) in his article ‘Biggest Money Laundering
Cases in India’ published by Sneha Mahawar, mentioned that, ED
registered 1180 cases, during the financial years between 2012-13 and 2021-22,
besides receiving 3,985 complaints under PMLA. Union Minister Pankaj Chaudhary
in August 2023, told Rajya Sabha, that ED carried out 3,010 raids and attached
proceeds of crime of Rs 99,356 crore under PMLA, since NDA came to power in
2014, and filed charge sheets in 888 cases, resulting in the conviction of 23
accused. The allegation is, Since 2014, there has been a fourfold jump in ED
cases against politicians, and 95% of them are from Opposition. Then, what is
the message coming out of this?
Cases initiated decades ago on some
individuals in numerous instances, kept in jails as undertrials for a long
period, and released on bail, but not before rejection several times in different
courts, are still kept pending. For instance, YS Jagan Mohan Reddy in an
alleged disproportionate assets case, was kept in jail for ‘Precious 16
Months,’ before he was released on bail. So also, Gali Janardhana Reddy
illegal mining case in which senior IAS officers were arrested and jailed. Who
would fill their precious life spent in jail and compensate the lost honor? Why
they are not decided either way is a million-dollar question.
It remains a question if quick relief
by courts as seen in several instances is available to all citizens alike or
otherwise. Are all being treated equally or some are more equal than others
before the law is the question that requires a precise answer, debate, and
discussion. Do some of these reliefs have any linkage to the ‘Capacity
and Capability’ and influence and wealth of individuals, to engage
competent advocate?
An arrest involves taking a person
into custody, and after being taken into custody, the person can be questioned
further and or charged. In Police Custody, accused is lodged in police station
lockup while in Judicial Custody of the concerned Magistrate, it is the jail. ‘Arrest,
Remand and Bail’ are components related to investigation. All these,
however, curtail personal liberty of an individual, if they are not adhered to
‘Principles of Natural Justice’ apart from and in addition to
Legality. To draw an accurate line between ‘Absolutely Legal and
Absolutely Illegal’ maybe delicate. International Practices,
Conventions, ‘Raj Dharma, and Ethics since Time Immemorial’ of
our own country, guide these in their correctness. 39 UNO ‘Body of
Principles’ do profess protection from any form of ‘Detention or
Imprisonment.’
Article 22 of Indian Constitution
pertains to protection of a person's right to personal liberty and safeguards
against detention or arrest without proper legal procedure, which many a time
is decided by courts only when they are produced. On March 22, 2024 Supreme
Court dismissing Union Government’s Review in a case, held that ED must furnish
the accused with reasons for arrest in writing. Kavitha challenging her arrest
by ED, moved Supreme Court for bail. Court declining her plea, asked her to
seek remedy from the first tier of Judicial Hierarchy.
The three-member bench observed that,
‘merely because she is a political person or someone who can afford to approach
the Supreme Court directly does not mean she can bypass statutory routes.’ Senior
Advocate Kapil Sibal representing Kavitha, in this context, made a notable
observation. He said that, ‘When the history of this court will be written,
this will not be in gold.’ Equally notable was the response of the bench that,
‘It is okay, we will see. We have to act uniform.’
Meanwhile, Rahul Gandhi revealed that
a Maharashtra leader, who left Congress, cried to his mother, saying that, he
had no power to fight the ‘Shakti’ and hence, do not want to go
to jail.' Rahul added that 'Every Autonomous Institution (ED, CBI or IT), have
traded their spines to the Centre.' In slight deviation from this, Telangana CM
Revanth Reddy not only described Delhi liquor scam as a ‘Lengthy TV
Serial’ but also said that, the arrest of Kavitha was nothing but an ‘Election
Stunt and Political Drama.’
Last but not least, former Telangana
CM K Chandrashekhar Rao in a statement, described arrest of Kejriwal by ED, as
another ‘Dark Day in the Country's Democratic History’ and
strongly condemned actions of BJP lead Union Government which is using ED, CBI,
and IT, for obliterating the opposition. KCR demanded immediate withdrawal of
cases and release of those arrested including Kavitha.
Well, If such, ‘Need to be
Highly Reputable Institutions’ do not reestablish their ‘Credibility,’
better than now, to live up to people’s expectations and infuse confidence in
them, where is fairness?!!! And hence, ‘Prevention is Better than Cure in
Economic Offences.’
No comments:
Post a Comment