Film ‘Miss India’
Story of an Ambitious Young Woman
Vanam Jwala Narasimha Rao
(September 24, 2025)
In
a random Netflix search on my TV, I and my wife came across the Film Miss
India, which was made available to audiences directly on it, five year ago
in 2020, bypassing the traditional theatrical release. The key role was played
by Keerthy Suresh as Manasa Samyuktha, an ambitious young woman from a
middle-class Telugu family, who refuses to be defined or restricted by
conventions, cultural barriers, or male-dominated industries, and moves to US
for higher studies and becomes an entrepreneur. Keerthy Suresh excelled in this
women empowerment role emphasizing the importance of identity, roots, and
confidence through her ‘MIS INDIA brand Tea.’
Watching Miss India in four thematic parts, the
journey begins in the early portrayal of Manasa Samyuktha’s childhood and youth
in India. Presence of Keerthy’s grandfather (Rajendra Prasad) an Ayurvedic
Doctor, who recognizes in her a spark of self-belief, sows the seed of her inspiration.
Manasa Samyuktha decided to pursue higher studies in US with a yet to define
plan of action. In Samyuktha’s early American life, education, exposure, and
ambition converge. Her brother (Kamal Kamaraju) represents the protective rigid
mindset of family responsibility. Despite discouragement from brother and
mother, (Nadhiya) and relationships started complicating her path Samyuktha proceeds
to crystallize her dream of making Indian Tea a Global Brand.
Moving further, the stakes rise as Samyuktha steps
into the world of business, together with entry of betrayal, that marks a
turning point, through a friend Vijay Anand (Naveen Chandra), unable to
reconcile love with ambition, which reflects a mindset uncomfortable with women
pursuing larger-than-life goals distances himself. Vijay a well-meaning
employer gives her the initial job, the first structured professional platform
where she can test her abilities and gain exposure to the corporate world.
Later he proposes marriage. This introduces the tension between societal
expectations and personal aspirations.
Samyuktha’s response, prioritizing her dream over
personal attachment, underscores the film’s central theme that, women must
sometimes negotiate or delay conventional roles to pursue unconventional
ambitions. The narrative treats him respectfully; he is not vilified or cast as
a villain, but his character illustrates the subtle pressures women face when
career and societal norms intersect. By including this episode, the film
emphasizes agency and choice and reinforces the broader message that, support is
valuable, but true empowerment comes from making decisions that align with
one’s own goals, even in the face of emotional or social pressures.
As Samyuktha’s entrepreneurial journey progresses, she
meets Kailash Sivakumar (Jagapathi Babu) the coffee baron, who embodies deep-rooted
cynicism of a male-dominated corporate world toward female entrepreneurs. Declining
her request to provide space in his business places selling Tea, Kailash with a
cruel posture offers a thousand dollars to Samyuktha, which she accepts as a
challenge, and with her clever management she turns it into double, not merely
as profit but as a demonstration of her vision, business acumen, and unyielding
determination, as a narrative device to highlight her grit.
Vikram’s (Sumant Shailendra) role as a large-scale
investor whose capital comes with scrutiny and subtle dominance, introduces a
more complex layer of ambition and dependence. By offering three crores, he
embodies both possibility and restraint, symbolically ‘sitting on Samyuktha’s
head.’ His presence also brings into focus the mechanisms of modern business.
Samyuktha’s consent to operate on debt-based tea pocket supplies, despite being
warned by Vikram, illustrates her careful balance of risk and control. As
warned by Vikram her business broke.
Eventually, these threads tie hooked on to a
culmination where Samyuktha, through perseverance, turns challenge into
triumph. The absence of her friend Vikram becomes a reminder that relationships
strained by ambition need not define one’s journey. Her confrontation with the
coffee magnate is staged less as a personal vendetta and more as a symbolic
clash between old monopolies and new possibilities. And the voice of her late
grandfather lingers as a moral anchor, proving prophetic in her success.
One of the film’s strongest affirmations comes from
the huge response to Samyuktha’s appeal for investment. The overwhelming
support she receives from a diverse audience underscores the collective desire
for change and the resonance of her vision. It is a cinematic reinforcement of
the principle that innovation and courage attract backing when aligned with
purpose and authenticity. This also reflects a broader societal readiness to
support women-led ventures. Her brother comes to understand her vision, not as
rebellion but as rightful assertion.
The culmination of these curves conveys a nuanced
message. Samyuktha’s triumph, achieved through strategic thinking,
perseverance, and unwavering confidence, exemplifies the power of grit. Yet,
the narrative does not shy away from her failures, setbacks, or moments of
doubt. These are woven seamlessly to keep her human and relatable. Her losses,
betrayals, and pressures mirror the challenges faced by many entrepreneurs,
particularly women who must negotiate societal expectations alongside business
hurdles. The film’s broader message, therefore, is one of balanced realism:
success is possible, but it is never effortless; ambition meets resistance, and
even victories are earned through resilience and careful negotiation of both
human and structural obstacles.
Ultimately, Miss India positions Samyuktha’s
journey as a metaphor for female empowerment in contemporary society: a
testament to the enduring value of courage, the importance of leveraging every
opportunity, and the recognition that triumph is inseparable from the trials
that precede it. The male characters, whether supportive, obstructive, or
ambivalent, are embedded into this narrative as societal reflections rather
than adversaries, ensuring the story remains thematically coherent and
motivational without descending into personal conflict or moral caricature.
Until Samyuktha faces betrayal, and before the film
shifted noticeably toward conventional Telugu Cinema tropes, Miss India
is directed with a distinct sensibility that maintained a narrative rhythm
balancing aspiration, strategy, and subtle social commentary, that sets it
apart from routine commercial fare. The screenplay focus on her determination,
entrepreneurial thinking, and emotional dynamics was quite exceptional. Characters
are portrayed with nuance, reflecting societal attitudes without resorting to
caricature or melodrama.
What followed then was, climactic sequences, including
confrontations with the antagonist, dramatic demonstrations of business
triumph, and the resolution of romantic or emotional subplots, heightened
dialogues, overt dramatization, and neatly packaged moral lessons. While this makes
the ending emotionally satisfying to a mass audience, it departs from the
measured, character-driven style till then. This stylistic transition despite
it underscores a tension often present in Telugu cinema, it does not diminish
Samyuktha’s journey or the core message of empowerment. Yet, it does flatten
some of the narrative’s earlier sophistication, giving the final sequences a
more predictable and routine feel.
The conclusion however, instead of destroying, repositions
the men in her life, within the theme, each, in their own way. By weaving together
themes: inspiration, conflict of family values, betrayal and opposition, and
eventual assertion, the film attempts to deliver its core idea that, a woman’s
dream, when pursued with courage, can transform not just her own destiny but
also challenge the assumptions of those around her.
Despite its theme of women's empowerment and
entrepreneurship, Miss India produced by Mahesh S Koneru and directed by
Narendra Nath (Screenplay and story too), struggled to resonate with a broad
audience, which likely contributed to its lack of commercial success. Dani
Sanchez-Lopez and Sujith Vaassudev handled the cinematography. Box Office
collections’ Figures are unavailable.
Endurance defines greatness more than brilliance.
Ultimately, it is not talent but tireless, quiet, continuous, and unseen
effort, that sustains success. That is Grit, as conceived
by Angela Lee Duckworth. According to Angela, a distinguished American
Academic and Psychologist, success is not a gift granted by talent, luck, or
birth, but a deliberate pursuit fueled by deep interest, honed through tireless
practice, elevated by a strong sense of purpose, and sustained by unwavering
hope. Director Narendra Nath truthfully presented this in Keerthy Suresh.


No comments:
Post a Comment