CONSTRUCTION OF
DOUBLE BED ROOM HOUSES
Chief Minister K Chandrashekhar
Rao
Statement in TS Legislative
Assembly
27-12-2016
Economically Weaker Sections Housing scheme was in
vogue for the past several decades offering permanent shelter to the shelter
less. In the erstwhile Andhra Pradesh State till 2003, about 17 Lakh 34
thousand and 826 houses were constructed at an estimate cost of Rs 1805. 26 Crore
as part of this scheme
The then AP Government records state that between 2004
and 2014, about 24 lakh 91 thousand and 870 houses were constructed for the
poor at a cost of Rs 9075 Crore. Under
Rajiv Swagruha, at a cost of Rs 1621 Crore about 12089 houses and under Rajiv
Gruhakalpa, at a cost of Rs 392 Crore about 37217 houses were also constructed as
per the records.
Within the GHMC vicinity, under JNURM Scheme, 46519
houses and as part of VAMBAY scheme 6608 houses were constructed as per the
government records. This would mean by the time Telangana state was formed, in
Telangana 43 Lakh 29 thousand and 124 houses were said to have been constructed
for the economically weaker sections in the State. If this be true, there would not have been any family left in the State
without any house! Therefore there would not have been any need for
construction of any new house for the poor! But the ground realities are
different. Even now, lakhs of poor people are applying to the government for provision
of houses. This has amply proved that the
construction of houses did not happen as per the records and the money spent
for the so-called construction of houses for the poor went into the pockets of
the corrupt.
The housing Scheme, which had its roots as a welfare
measure for the needy people changed its path and ended up becoming a source of
exploitation and illegitimate income for the leaders and activists of political
parties. This was particularly on the increase during 2004 and 2014 in the
United AP State if one examines the amount of corruption took place during the
same period. The number of houses that were said to have been constructed
according to the bills passed was not found on the ground. There were umpteen numbers
of incidents where people have claimed bills on the construction of houses
which were more than the entire household in a village.
For instance, in Manthani Assembly Constituency, bills
for the construction of houses stood at 40 percent more the actual families!
These overestimated houses were sanctioned and bills were paid. This is a
classic example of wild corruption. The then government itself had ordered an
inquiry into the nexus between the politicians and the officials and the
inquiry established the irregularities and corruption. A Third party inquiry
was also held.
Between 2004 and 2014, criminal cases were registered against
225 persons for committing irregularities under Indiramma Housing Scheme. Among
the accused, there were 122 officials, 133 middlemen and politicians. One ZPTC member, three MPTC members, 14
Sarpanches, three Single window Chairmen were proved to be partners of the scam
as per the then government findings. 1, 94, 519 ineligible persons found to be allotted
houses under the scheme. About Rs 235.90 Crore was paid to about 1, 04, 000
persons. 512 officials from the Housing Department were dismissed from the service
and another 140 were suspended. Of this 122 officials were convicted and about
Rs 2.86 Crore were recovered. In order to bring out the corrupt practices took
place under the united AP State, the Telangana state government had ordered a
CBCID inquiry on July 26, 2014 on the scam which is still going on.
While the inquiry was on, on the houses constructed
under Indiramma Housing Scheme, we have decided not to harm the poor people who
have constructed houses under the scheme. Hence we have instructed the District
Collectors to conduct a survey and identify the genuine beneficiaries. The
revenue officials conducted a survey in the villages and found that there were
about 1, 19, 00 bogus beneficiaries. About 2, 46,170 were listed as genuine
beneficiaries. Of this, about 56,059 houses were totally constructed and about
2, 04,000 houses are in various stages of completion. We paid Rs. 369.48 Crores
of rupees for Indiramma houses till now since we came to power. After
completion of Indiramma houses Rs. 1,159.85 crores are to be paid. Government
is ready to pay them. We would like to place this information before the House
that the Government is paying bills to the houses which are in construction
stage and which were sanctioned prior to 2014.
The Government has resolved to implement this scheme
without giving scope to political corruption and to accomplish the desires of
poor people in the state of Telangana, which was carved only through people
movement. It is troublesome for entire family to live in one room. In these
houses the problems that are faced by women are beyond description. With the
intention that this situation should not be there, we gave an assurance to give
constructed Double bed room houses to poor in our Election Manifesto. Our
Government set aside the policy of construction of houses by way of some amount
as subsidy by Government and rest to be borne by beneficiary. Our Scheme was
designed in such a manner that not a single penny will be spent by beneficiary.
Government took the entire responsibility of constructing houses. Due to this,
the expenditure for construction of houses for weaker sections grew many folds compared
to the expenditure that is incurred by erstwhile Governments. For the
construction of double bedroom houses in 560 square feet Rs. 5,04,000/- was
allocated in villages, Rs. 5,30,000/- was allocated in towns and within GHMC
limits Rs. 7 lakhs was allocated.
When compared to earlier stage constructions long ago,
the expenditure for house construction increased many times. In addition to
budgetary allocation we sought financial assistance from various financial
institutions. I am submitting to the house that State Government has mobilized
Rs. 17,660 Crores required for house construction. In two years, we allocated Rs.
1433 Crores of rupees in state Government Budget. From centre also, Rs. 333
Crores were sanctioned for house construction schemes. Central and State
Government pooled Rs. 1766 crores of rupees, HUDCO agreed to give Rs. 3344.76
crores last year and this year Rs. 12,549 Crores, totaling 15,893.76 Crores. All
together Rs. 17,660.40 Crores were pooled and are ready for construction of houses.
While the erstwhile Government spent Only Rs. 11000 Crores for house
construction till Telangana was formed, we in two and half years allocated Rs. 17,660
Crores.
If we analyze deeply the policy followed by earlier Governments
in the matter of house construction for Weaker Sections, it is evident that,
the poor were not largely benefited. It was only as namesake that the
Government built the houses and allotted to poor and in effect the entire
burden was on weaker sections only. In the incurred expenditure, the beneficiary
spent huge amounts than the amount actually spent by Government. These facts
will be clearly seen if we observe the Housing Scheme from the beginning.
In 1974, Hutting Scheme was in Vogue. Then for
construction of Hut, Government gave Rs. 400. By 1978, it gave Rs. 1000/- under
semi permanent House Scheme per house. In 1983, construction of pucca houses
started. From this the stage began wherein the Government gave some amount as subsidy,
and the rest of expenditure was to be borne by the beneficiary. In 1983, in
rural areas, Rs. 6000/- expenditure was estimated for the construction of every
house. Out of this amount Government used to subsidize Rs.2750/- as its share.
The beneficiary had to bear to Rs. 3250/- i.e., Rs. 3000/- by way of Bank Loan
and Rs. 250/- by way of his own contribution. That shows that 54% of cost was
to be borne by beneficiary and that of Government was only 46%. The burden on
the beneficiary increased from then onwards. In 2004, unit cost was Rs.
22,500/-. In this, the subsidy of Government was Rs. 7000/- the beneficiary had
to borne Rs.15, 500/-. This would mean that the beneficiary was bearing 68.8%
while Government was contributing only 31.2%. In 2014, the unit cost was decided
at Rs. 70,000/-. In this, Government subsidy was Rs. 20,500/-. The beneficiary
had to borne Rs.49, 500/-. That means the beneficiary was bearing 70.7% while
Government was contributing only 29.3%.
The erstwhile Government proudly declared that it had
constructed houses with Rs. 1 lakh cost for SC’s, and Rs. 1, 05,000/- for ST’s.
In case of both SC’s, ST’s also, the burden was on beneficiary. In case of
SC’s, the unit cost per house was Rs. 1 lakh and Government borne only Rs.
20,500/-. The remaining burden i.e., Rs.
79,500/- fell on the beneficiary. That means SC
beneficiary borne 79.5% while the subsidy given by Government was only 20.5%.
In case of ST’s same policy was implemented. In unit cost of Rs.1, 05, 000/-
the beneficiary borne Rs. 84,500/- while the subsidy from the Government was
Rs. 20,500/-. That means 80.47% burden was on ST beneficiary while Government
borne only 19.53%. From 1983 to 2014, in rural areas the Weaker Sections borne
72% of expenditure for their house and Government gave only 28% in form of
subsidy. While the situation in rural areas was like this, the burden that fell
on beneficiaries in urban areas was much more. From 1983 to 2014 the burden
that fell on beneficiary in urban areas was 90% while the subsidy given by
Government was only 10%. If we analyze the whole issue it is clearly seen that
more burden was on people and the publicity was that they were weaker sections
housing built by Government.
Unable to understand the above facts, the poor people
came forward with a hope that Government is constructing houses for them. By
bearing additional burden, they were pushed in to debts. The poor were in dilemma,
as they had to pay the interest along with actual amount. For recovering the
Bank Loans, the Government officials used to take away the doors. We were all witness
to the incidents where people used to lock their houses on hearing that
officials were coming. The housing scheme instead of providing shelter to the
poor had made them debtors and the scheme had become to defame them. (During
reply to the discussion CM announced waiver of Rs. 3920 Crores of dues
pertaining to Indiramma houses amidst applause of Members)
Against this background our Government decided that
these problems should not be there for the poor people. In the double bed room
scheme the Government is constructing houses and giving it to poor with Government
bearing 100% expenditure and not a single penny has to be borne by the poor. At
this juncture, this August House should note that, if this scheme also slips in
to the hands of corrupt people, there is every danger that large amount of
public money being misappropriated.
Hence, the State Government initiated many reforms in
this whole process. Without giving scope to corruption stringent Rules were
framed. The modalities were formulated in such a way that selection is to be
done in transparent way. Earlier there used to be different quotas namely, in-charge
Minister Quota, MLA quota and so on. This quota system is now done away. With
this we also have done away with political intervention completely. MLA will
select the village in their respective constituencies, while the beneficiaries
in villages will be decided by district administration under the chairmanship
of Collector.
The process begins with receiving of applications, their
thorough scrutiny followed by discussion with people in Grama Sabha for
approval of beneficiaries. If the applications received are more than the
houses sanctioned in a village, then lottery system will be followed.
Construction of houses will be done with quality
parameters. The ideals of Government would be adhered. For this purpose, we
requested the Collectors to handover the construction of houses to experienced
and capable construction engineering sections. The Collectors had selected the
suitable places for double bedroom houses colony. So far we had sanctioned 2, 60,000
houses. The tender process is going on. Tenders were finalized for 14,224
houses. 1217 houses were constructed. People are residing in them. At present
9588 houses are in construction stage at various places in the state.
I would like to present before the august house one
fact. The contractors are hesitating to file tenders for double bedroom houses,
because of two reasons. One reason is that the Mission Kakatiya, Mission
Bhagiratha, Irrigation projects, Roads construction implemented by State Government
are going on full-fledged and these contractors are involved in them. Many other
working agencies in the state are also involved in these activities. Secondly,
the scope for profit in construction of Double Bed Room house is not enough.
Hence they are hesitating a bit.
In
order to overcome these situations, Government has initiated suitable measures.
We are exploring alternatives. We are supplying sand necessary for house
construction free of cost. Without concern about Market prices, we entered into
MOU with 31 companies to give cement at Rs.230/-. This Government is with strong
resolve to complete the construction as contemplated. I would like to tell the
house that Government is fully committed to construct the houses that will
showcase the self respect of people in Telangana State which itself was
achieved to upkeep the same self respect.
There is something odd about the usage of the phrase "double bed room" which appears to be peculiar to Hyderabad and or Telangana region. In the real estate parlance elsewhere it is not heard, the common usage is "Two bed-rooms", "Hall" and "Kitchen" or simply "2BHK". Do they mean by "double bed room" that a room in which a double-bed can be accommodated? For that, a room should be at least 10x10ft and not less than that where a double-bed occupies too much space. On the other hand, 2BHK is perhaps misunderstood by people. Such misnomers are unfortunately rather too common in many regions in India.
ReplyDelete