Emulate
PPP-Powered 108 service &
A Consolidated Fund
Vanam Jwala
Narasimha Rao
Telangana Today
(06-07-2019)
Millennium Post, New Delhi
The Telangana Government, according
to media reports, has decided to invite tenders to
identify the service provider for operation and maintenance of 108 Emergency
Responsive Services in the State. A Committee has been constituted for
preparation of RFP document, floating tenders, processing finalization and
transition of services among others.
When the then united AP Government,
a decade and half ago, felt that lack of transportation was the main reason for
non-utilization of healthcare services for institutional deliveries, it
initiated the Reproductive and Child Health Project to implement Rural
Emergency Health Transport Services (REHTS) scheme in rural and tribal areas of
the state in 2005. REHTS was part of Government of India’s National Rural
Health Mission (NRHM) for providing integrated, comprehensive primary health
care services. It was aimed at transporting pregnant women, infants, children
below 12 years of age and any other cases in need of emergency health care
services to the nearest hospital.
The scheme was piloted in four
districts of Kadapa, Kurnool, Mahbubnagar, Nizamabad and the tribal areas of
nine other districts in the year 2005. Initially 122 ambulances were deployed
under the scheme and were operationalised through NGOs as a Public Private Partnership
(PPP) concept.
Successful EMRI
The Government recognized Emergency
Management and Research Institute (EMRI), a non-profit organization established
in April 2005, by Satyam Computers Ramalinga Raju, as the State Level Nodal
Agency, to provide comprehensive emergency response across the state, in PPP mode
and signed first Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on 2nd April 2005. EMRI on
its own launched 70 ambulances funded by Raju, from August 2005 to June 2006
covering 50 towns of 25 million populations in the united AP state. A toll-free
telephone number 108 was allotted by the Government and the ambulance services
became popular with this number.
The State Government having piloted
the REHTS decided to expand to the remaining 18 (Rural) districts of the state by
utilizing the services of EMRI as the State Level Nodal Agency and accordingly
entrusted the responsibility of operationalizing the balance of the 310
ambulances and signed the 2nd MoU on 22nd September 2006. Formal launching took
place on January 26, 2007. The earlier piloted districts were also handed over
to EMRI.
The third MoU signed in October 2007
further strengthened the PPP. 122 more ambulances were added then. A revised
MoU was signed between Government and EMRI on 5th May, 2008 and accordingly
Government committed to provide 150 more ambulances (later another 150
ambulances). As far as the financial commitments were concerned, during the
financial year 2008-09, out of the direct operational cost of Rs. 1,18,420/- an
amount of Rs.1,12,499/- towards its 95% share per ambulance per month was
provided to EMRI. Later this figure was subjected to changes. In due course
more and more ambulances were added as and when needed and the arrangement
between Government and EMRI was Public Private Partnership but not a tender
process initially.
EMRI later expanded its services to
several states like Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Himachal Pradesh, Meghalaya,
Tamil Nadu, Assam, Uttarakhand, Rajasthan, Goa etc. Almost all states are
covered now handled by either EMRI or others. Initially in none of the states, tender
process was followed and everywhere it was based on a MoU.
National Health Systems Resource
Centre (NHSRC) commissioned by Government of India observed that, “EMRI was
undoubtedly a historic landmark in the provision of health care in the nation.
To its credit goes the achievement of bringing Emergency Medical Response on to
the agenda of the nation. The tremendous gratitude and praise of the family
members of the emergency victim for the timely arrival of this Angel of
Mercy when heard in first person is most convincing and moving and
makes the service very popular”.
Partnership with Private
The great success of 108 had its
roots in Public Private Partnership concept. It is assumed that collaboration
with the private sector in the form of PPP would improve equity, efficiency,
accountability, quality and accessibility of the entire health system.
Advocates argue that the PPP can potentially gain from one another in the form
of resources, technology, knowledge and skills, management practices, cost
efficiency and so on. Provision of Emergency Response Services by EMRI is the
best example of this.
There is no hard and fast rule that,
the governments, to follow in choosing a non-profit organization to partner
with it for providing services in PPP framework. Several analysis and studies however
suggest that a competitive process of selecting the private partner for PPP
framework is less effective than an invited or negotiated partnership. While
competing to win the deal, the private partner’s primary concern is to quote
less to become the lowest bidder whereas the government side officials’ main
concern would be to meet procedural requirements than meeting beneficiaries’
needs. Tendering process in government is adapted to choose the lowest bidder.
Though it is economical initially, the trend later would be up-ward revision of
costs and if government disagrees, then the level of quality and effectiveness
comes down.
Hence either prior negotiations with
the potential partner or a tender where eligibility conditions are tailor-made
or the prior experience of the private partner to be used as a basis for
choosing is ideal for the success of PPP. Public Private Partnership is
different from privatization and the message has to go without ambiguity.
Partnership is not meant to be a
substitution for lesser provisioning of government resources nor an abdication
of Government responsibility but as a tool for augmenting the services. This
entails a paradigm shift in the role of the government from provision of
services to partnering with a private non-governmental organization in making
available these services, through a meaningful arrangement popularly known as
Memorandum of Understanding.
No Single Source
The 108 emergency response services
are the first of its kind Public Private Partnership originated in the then
united AP and in those days, it was a role model for other states to replicate
on the similar lines as in AP. The model sustained and has come to stay despite
some occasional hiccups. 108 emergency response services are the one of the
most successful Transformational Institutions conceived and developed in the
united AP state. The vision of EMRI is to provide leadership through PPP
framework to respond to emergency calls round the clock and save lives meeting
global standards in Emergency Management, Research and Training.
Surprisingly few persons
associated with this model themselves are now demanding a tender process for
operationalizing the scheme instead of PPP model. Whatever it might be the most
important thing is how best the government funds are channelized. The best way
to channelize the funds would be to create a Permanent “Health and
Emergency Care Developmental Fund” by pooling NRHM, State Government
and Private Contributions from many but not from one single source either
through the tender route or through PPP route. For such a huge scheme one
single source means "dependence in uncertainty".
Such an arrangement may not
require one single Private Partner or someone else through tender, but would
certainly require management experts as CEO and in PPP mode. Let the PPP
concept be dynamic and not static for ever with the boundaries well defined. In
implementation of the scheme let there be no wrong signals go to the people. If
the scheme fails, in future it would be difficult to bring it back again on
track.
No comments:
Post a Comment