PPP and Nirmala
Sitharaman Budget
Vanam
Jwala Narasimha Rao
The Hans
India (07-07-2019)
Union
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman presenting her budget in the Lok Sabha made
couple of references to Public Private Partnership. Citing the example of the phenomenal task in cities like Mumbai and smaller cities
of Indian Railways, Nirmala Sitharaman said that the Railways will be encouraged
to invest more in suburban railways through Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV)
structures like Rapid Regional Transport System (RRTS) proposed on the
Delhi-Meerut route. Accordingly, she proposed to enhance the metro railway initiatives
by encouraging more PPP (Public Private Partnership) initiatives and ensuring completion
of sanctioned works.
In yet
another reference the Finance Minister said that under the Pradhan Mantri
Gramin Digital Saksharta Abhiyan, over two crore rural Indians have so far been
made digitally literate. She proposed that internet connectivity in local
bodies in every Panchayat in the country will be speeded up with assistance
from Universal Service Obligation Fund under a Public Private Partnership
arrangement. This will bridge rural-urban digital divide said the Minister.
Estimating that Railway Infrastructure would need an investment
of Rs 50 lakh crores between 2018-2030 and given that the capital expenditure
outlays of Railways are around Rs 1.5 to Rs 1.6 lakh crores per annum and completing
even all sanctioned projects would take decades PPP was suggested. Nirmala
Sitharaman proposed to use Public-Private Partnership to unleash faster development
and completion of tracks, rolling stock manufacturing and delivery of passenger
freight services.
Why is this importance to Public Private Partnership in taking
up government projects? Is this a new phenomenon or has been in existence quite
for some time?
During the period immediately after independence, in
order to overcome the red-tape and indifference in the functioning of
Government Departments and to serve the citizen better, several Public Sector
Undertakings (PSU) were established all over the country. As they were
incurring losses public sector reforms were introduced leading to closure of
PSU s in large numbers.
Later about three decades and half ago, when the Indian
economy was opening up, several joint ventures were formed in just one year
between Indian and foreign companies. Majority of them ended up in breaking
within five years later as they failed to produce the expected results. The
objective of partnerships, through joint ventures, of making one plus one
produce three, could at best be realized in producing just less than two-the
reason being ‘cultural’ problems. The development of a comprehensive shared
vision, going beyond the financial value of the Joint Venture to surface and
match the cultural values of partners was absent then. Thus, the experience in
India revealed that joint ventures are notoriously difficult to manage with
some notable exceptions.
Against this experience, in India, as in other countries
evolved the concept of “Public Private Partnership” and steadily gaining
strength. It is assumed that Government’s collaboration with non-profit private
sector in the form of PPP would improve equity, efficiency, accountability,
quality and accessibility of the system. Advocates argue that the PPP can
potentially gain from one another in the form of resources, technology,
knowledge and skills, management practices, cost efficiency and so on.
Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) is an evolving concept
as well as practice in many developing countries, in which an otherwise
government (Public) service is funded by state either totally or partly, and
operated through a partnership between government and one or more
non-governmental organizations or private sector companies.
The (Private) non-governmental organizations as well as
some Corporate as part of social responsibility have been providing citizen
services in a majority of democratic and developing countries including India.
The commitment and efficiency with which these services are being provided by
some of them forced the government to prefer for an increased involvement of
them in the provision of services traditionally provided by, and seen as a
function of the state. This entails a paradigm shift in the role of the
government from provision of services to partnering with a private
non-governmental organization in making available these services, through a
meaningful arrangement. Such arrangements are referred as Public Private Partnerships
(PPP). However, the responsibility for providing the service still rests with
the government.
The NGO or a similar organization initially may invest in
developing infrastructure, leadership and technology and provide related
services in partnership with the government by way of making proper use of the
state machinery which often do not add any additional financial burden to the
state. The government subsequently adds strength to the PPP by providing both
Capital and Operational Expenditure within its budgetary limits for a
particular service while retaining responsibility for the delivery of core
services.
Arrangements between the government and the private
organization are governed by long-term and short term understanding in the form
of “Memorandum of Understanding” or “PPP Agreement”. It specifies the
obligations of both the parties to deliver within the broad framework of
performance indicators and standards. Memorandum of understanding is an essential tool to empower Public Private Partnership.
The essential role of the
Government (Public) in all PPPs is to define the scope of activity of service,
specify priorities, targets and outputs and allow operational freedom to
deliver the services to its private partner.
PPP takes many forms such as design, construct and
maintain or build, own, operate and transfer. The choice of form depends on
factors such as the government's objectives, the nature of the project, the
availability of finance, and the expertise that the private sector can bring.
It also equally depends on the values, objectives and goals of the partnering
private sector. PPP is increasingly being used in social service activities
such as providing Emergency Response Services as in the case of 108 ambulance
services almost all over India beginning with the then united Andhra Pradesh. to
everyone in general and to vulnerable sections in particular.
It is a prerequisite to make the partnership a publicly
driven process in order to improve its legitimacy in the eyes of the common
citizen. It is also important that there is clear articulation of
responsibility, an open process and meticulous detailing to avoid suspicions
and apprehensions in the minds of all. Therefore, the power relations in the
partnership also needed to be understood.
PPP however would not mean privatization of the sector.
Partnership is not meant to be a substitution for lesser provisioning of
government resources nor an abdication of Government responsibility but as a
tool for augmenting the services. The success of this PPP will however depend on the
preparedness and commitment of respective state governments as well as private
partner in adhering to the provisions of MoU in letter and spirit failing which
it is the poor citizen who is the sufferer. Then only it can be called as
Empowerment of PPP through MoU.
No comments:
Post a Comment